Great question......can be answered many ways.....it's great to be an NBA fan right now. I'll throw another name out there. Kawhi Leonard
A lot of people don't understand that there's a big difference between Super-Stars & Stars.
All of the above is why the league lacks top-talent as it's dwindled through the years...
A lot of people don't understand that there's a big difference between Super-Stars & Stars.
A Super-Star go down as one of the greatest, in an elite group all-time.
As of right now there are only 3 Super Stars in the NBA (LeBron & Durant) with Curry just now reaching that level but still borderline as we'll have to see if it continues.
Some guys might teeter in-between SuperStar & Star Status, but never reach the elite level.
Let's use Russell Westbrook & Chris Paul as examples.
2 terrific players, but only stars because you simply & clearly don't put him in Jordan, Magic, or Lebron's category.
There aren't even any great centers in the game like there used to be.
Anthony Davis might get there but he's not in Shaq, Hakeem, D. Robinson, etc.'s group.
All of the above is why the league lacks top-talent as it's dwindled through the years...
Do i think Wilt Chamberlain would dominate as much today as he did in his era?
No i don't.
But not necessarily because he was less gifted athletically.
It's because the majority of the opponents he was playing against were Greg Kites of the world.
Millions of years of evolution, and some people think we as people & athletes have evolved even more so in a matter of 30-40 years. Give me a break.
If thats the case, why arent basketball players jumping any higher than the Jordan & Dominique's of the past?
Why aren't RB's or WR's running 4.0 and under now?
The changes we are seeing simply has more to do more people committing to & playing sports these days & yes maybe even focusing more on their health/nutrition, rather than a miraculous "evolvement" of people in a matter of only 30 years... (roll eyes)
Do i think Wilt Chamberlain would dominate as much today as he did in his era?
No i don't.
But not necessarily because he was less gifted athletically.
It's because the majority of the opponents he was playing against were Greg Kites of the world.
Millions of years of evolution, and some people think we as people & athletes have evolved even more so in a matter of 30-40 years. Give me a break.
If thats the case, why arent basketball players jumping any higher than the Jordan & Dominique's of the past?
Why aren't RB's or WR's running 4.0 and under now?
The changes we are seeing simply has more to do more people committing to & playing sports these days & yes maybe even focusing more on their health/nutrition, rather than a miraculous "evolvement" of people in a matter of only 30 years... (roll eyes)
Do i think Wilt Chamberlain would dominate as much today as he did in his era?
No i don't.
But not necessarily because he was less gifted athletically.
It's because the majority of the opponents he was playing against were Greg Kites of the world.
Millions of years of evolution, and some people think we as people & athletes have evolved even more so in a matter of 30-40 years. Give me a break.
If thats the case, why arent basketball players jumping any higher than the Jordan & Dominique's of the past?
Why aren't RB's or WR's running 4.0 and under now?
The changes we are seeing simply has more to do more people committing to & playing sports these days & yes maybe even focusing more on their health/nutrition, rather than a miraculous "evolvement" of people in a matter of only 30 years... (roll eyes)
Dunno --- to start the 2014-15 season, NBA rosters had 101 international players. Compare that number to 15-20 years ago, when the NBA rosters *didn't* have 101 international players. Instead, they had, yep..........lesser-talented American players!
But I'm talking about top-to-bottom talent, and you're talking about the top 10-20 players (and the superstars) --- I know, not exactly the same thing.
But still, where did the elite talent go? Basketball doesn't have a baseball problem @ the youth/teenage level (where some of the top baseball talent has shifted to lacrosse, golf, action sports, and white-people suburban sports). If you're 6'7", and you're a great athlete --- guess what, you're still playing basketball.
With all the advances in training, scouting, coaching, nutrition, video (and the growth of international hoops) --- do you really believe the world is producing less-talented players?
I'm willing to admit there is a superstar shortage. But two possible reasons:
1) There is always going to be a "shortage" when you compare to the Bird/Magic/Jordan era.
2) Thanks to 400 different TV channels (and the Internet, and 24/7 media), there really aren't many superstars, legends, icons, etc. Most sports (other than NFL) have become niche sports --- same for music, movies, television shows. Just look at the historical ratings for World Series, and NBA Playoffs. Hard to become a superstar, when millions of people are watching Walking Dead, Gold Rush, Dancing with the Stars, and the Kardashians.
Music might be a better example --- we went from Elvis, to Beatles, to Michael Jackson..........absolute icons. These days, almost impossible for a band to reach that status. What's the most recent example, or almost-there example? Pearl Jam? Coldplay? Taylor Swift?
You really can't tell the difference in foot speed from then to now?
It isn't exactly a subtle nuance. I mean it is off the charts noticeable.
Also guys are jumping higher on average. Guys have 10 pounds more muscle on them now than in the mid 80s.
You need to look at the aggregate more.
You can't tell the difference in the aggregate foot speeds of the players?
Going beyond that point seems useless. If there isn't an agreement about that then we're watching 2 different games.
Do you think guys have 10 pounds more of muscle on average than 30 years ago?