I spelled it out for you. Should be easy to understand why. We have guys like you and others who will vote akp #1 in any negative poll....and the other option could be ISIS or Bin Laden.....add that to the ghost votes and there you have it. Concept is pretty simple. When you look at the numbers and then realize acebb finishes first it really is remarkable.
I spelled it out for you. Should be easy to understand why. We have guys like you and others who will vote akp #1 in any negative poll....and the other option could be ISIS or Bin Laden.....add that to the ghost votes and there you have it. Concept is pretty simple. When you look at the numbers and then realize acebb finishes first it really is remarkable.
Hahaha, let's be honest. With this being such a conservative loon site, the contest shouldn't even be close. But, I can list off the people who voted for me. I have no clue how Ace has so many votes. There's a group of about 4-5 guys from the Offshore that got all butt hurt over the Sterling threads. It's hilarious how they can't let that go, lol.
Harrycarray
Pocketrockets
Loomis (this dude is a real fucking winner, lol)
Enfuego (although we have become more cordial since then)
And this other dude I can't think of off the top of my head.
The list of people who voted for me is a real group of comedians. You know how funny it would be to get all these guys in a room. Scientists from all over the world would want to study them... like zoo animals.
Thing that sucks is Ace protects the others that are as worthless as it gets. So I hope they don't come away thinking people don't think they are worthless. Ace is just sooo worthless that it's hard to put another persons name down. Like Seymour, JDouche, Joe, Scott L, and Schiff are absolutely as worthless as human beings can get. Disgusting people.
No debate! Settled Science!
Today Earth is affected by fluctuations called the Milankovich cycles. There are three different Milankovich cycles, and they occur each 20,000, 40,000 and 100,000 years. Over the last one million years these cycles have caused ice ages every 100,000 years, and right now we are in the middle of a warming period that has so far lasted 11,000 years.
“Earth’s climate history is complex. With this research we can show that cycles like the Milankovich cycles were at play 1.4 billion years ago – a period, we know only very little about”, says Donald Canfield, adding:
“This research will also help us understand how Milankovitch cyclicity ultimately controls climate change on Earth.”
In the new scientific paper in the journal PNAS, the researchers report both geochemical and sedimentological evidence for repeated, short-term climate fluctuations 1.4 billion years ago. For example the fossilized sediments show how layers of organic material differed over time, indicating cycle changes in wind patterns, rain fall and ocean circulations.
“These cycles were a little different than today’s Milankovich cycles.
Today Earth is affected by fluctuations called the Milankovich cycles. There are three different Milankovich cycles, and they occur each 20,000, 40,000 and 100,000 years. Over the last one million years these cycles have caused ice ages every 100,000 years, and right now we are in the middle of a warming period that has so far lasted 11,000 years.
“Earth’s climate history is complex. With this research we can show that cycles like the Milankovich cycles were at play 1.4 billion years ago – a period, we know only very little about”, says Donald Canfield, adding:
“This research will also help us understand how Milankovitch cyclicity ultimately controls climate change on Earth.”
In the new scientific paper in the journal PNAS, the researchers report both geochemical and sedimentological evidence for repeated, short-term climate fluctuations 1.4 billion years ago. For example the fossilized sediments show how layers of organic material differed over time, indicating cycle changes in wind patterns, rain fall and ocean circulations.
“These cycles were a little different than today’s Milankovich cycles.
Acebb..how dare you. The global warming idea is not even up for debate anymore. Who cares about skewed data. Who cares if they were not counting some buoys that were not recording warmer than expected sea temps. Who cares if top scientists who put their names on "peer reviewed" studies were lying to push the global warming agenda.
Flashback 1989: UN Predicted Global Warming Would Destroy Entire Nations By 2000
We are now living 15 years after the global warming apocalypse.
Well, at least according to a top United Nations official who warned that “entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth” by the year 2000 if nothing was done to stop global warming.
The dire warning came from a top U.N. official in 1989, warning that mankind only had a 10-year window to stop global warming before it went beyond human ability to reverse. But 15 years after the warning, no nations have been wiped off the planet because of global warming, and global temperatures have not warmed nearly as much as most climate models predicted.
The San Jose Mercury News reported on June 30, 1989 that a “senior environmental official at the United Nations, Noel Brown, says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising sea levels if global warming is not reversed by the year 2000.”
Brown, who was the director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program, warned that “[c]oastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ‘eco-refugees,’ threatening political chaos.” Brown added that “governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it goes beyond human” ability to stop it.
But 2000 came and went with little fanfare, and not a single nation has been “wiped out” or even come close.
The New York Times reported last November that global warming-induced food shortages had already toppled governments, but then quickly retracted the remark because the claim is not true.
U.N. officials and climate scientists, however, are still warning that sea level rise threatens to flood coastal cities and that more extreme weather events will create millions of climate refugees.
“Climate change is a threat to our very existence,” writes Michael Møller, acting head of U.N.’s Geneva office. “Wherever we live and whatever we do. We all contribute to it. And we all have a responsibility to do something about it.”
The U.N. and other groups are calling for countries to drastically cut carbon dioxide emissions to avoid warming of 2 degrees Celsius above the pre-industrial era.
“We have no time to waste, and much to gain by moving quickly down a lower-carbon pathway. All countries must be part of the solution if we are to stay below the 2 degrees Celsius temperature rise threshold,” UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said in a statement.
The International Energy Agency says that 90 percent of carbon dioxide emissions must be cut to avoid warming over 2 degrees Celsius — meaning that fossil fuels would either have to be totally revamped or done away with completely to meet the 2 degree threshold.
“A continuation of current trends – which saw overall electricity emissions increase by 75% between 1990 and 2011, due to rising demand but little change in emissions intensity – would dangerously drive up electricity-related emissions,” IEA found in a recent report.
But what the U.N. and IEA leave out is that carbon dioxide emissions stemming from fossil fuel use has skyrocketed since 2000 — the predicted doomsday. Atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide have grown from about 370 parts per million in 2000 to more than 400 parts per million in February 2015.
But while CO2 concentrations have skyrocketed, global average temperatures have stagnated for the last 15 to 20 years depending on what measurements are used. Surface temperature data shows little to no warming trend for the last 15 years or so.
Satellite data, which measures the lowest parts of Earth’s atmosphere, shows warming stalled for more than 18 years.
[h/t Real Science]
Follow Michael on Twitter
:Carcajada:
We are now living 15 years after the global warming apocalypse.
Well, at least according to a top United Nations official who warned that “entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth” by the year 2000 if nothing was done to stop global warming.
The dire warning came from a top U.N. official in 1989, warning that mankind only had a 10-year window to stop global warming before it went beyond human ability to reverse. But 15 years after the warning, no nations have been wiped off the planet because of global warming, and global temperatures have not warmed nearly as much as most climate models predicted.
The San Jose Mercury News reported on June 30, 1989 that a “senior environmental official at the United Nations, Noel Brown, says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising sea levels if global warming is not reversed by the year 2000.”
Brown, who was the director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program, warned that “[c]oastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ‘eco-refugees,’ threatening political chaos.” Brown added that “governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it goes beyond human” ability to stop it.
But 2000 came and went with little fanfare, and not a single nation has been “wiped out” or even come close.
The New York Times reported last November that global warming-induced food shortages had already toppled governments, but then quickly retracted the remark because the claim is not true.
U.N. officials and climate scientists, however, are still warning that sea level rise threatens to flood coastal cities and that more extreme weather events will create millions of climate refugees.
“Climate change is a threat to our very existence,” writes Michael Møller, acting head of U.N.’s Geneva office. “Wherever we live and whatever we do. We all contribute to it. And we all have a responsibility to do something about it.”
The U.N. and other groups are calling for countries to drastically cut carbon dioxide emissions to avoid warming of 2 degrees Celsius above the pre-industrial era.
“We have no time to waste, and much to gain by moving quickly down a lower-carbon pathway. All countries must be part of the solution if we are to stay below the 2 degrees Celsius temperature rise threshold,” UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said in a statement.
The International Energy Agency says that 90 percent of carbon dioxide emissions must be cut to avoid warming over 2 degrees Celsius — meaning that fossil fuels would either have to be totally revamped or done away with completely to meet the 2 degree threshold.
“A continuation of current trends – which saw overall electricity emissions increase by 75% between 1990 and 2011, due to rising demand but little change in emissions intensity – would dangerously drive up electricity-related emissions,” IEA found in a recent report.
But what the U.N. and IEA leave out is that carbon dioxide emissions stemming from fossil fuel use has skyrocketed since 2000 — the predicted doomsday. Atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide have grown from about 370 parts per million in 2000 to more than 400 parts per million in February 2015.
But while CO2 concentrations have skyrocketed, global average temperatures have stagnated for the last 15 to 20 years depending on what measurements are used. Surface temperature data shows little to no warming trend for the last 15 years or so.
Satellite data, which measures the lowest parts of Earth’s atmosphere, shows warming stalled for more than 18 years.
[h/t Real Science]
Follow Michael on Twitter
:Carcajada:
'Seas Will Slowly Keep Rising'
Obama Ignores Himself On Global Warming, Buys Beachfront Mansion
DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION | MICHAEL BASTASCH
http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/21/obama-hawaii-magnum-pi-global-warming/
:madasshol
Obama Ignores Himself On Global Warming, Buys Beachfront Mansion
DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION | MICHAEL BASTASCH
http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/21/obama-hawaii-magnum-pi-global-warming/
:madasshol
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/backyard-burger-and-wiener-roasts-targeted-by-epa/article/2561474
I don't suppose anyone here enjoys grilling out during the summer months, do you?
If so, bad news. The EPA has their eye on you.
The Environmental Protection Agency has its eyes on pollution from backyard barbecues.
The agency announced that it is funding a University of California project to limit emissions resulting in grease drippings with a special tray to catch them and a "catalytic" filtration system.
The $15,000 project has the "potential for global application," said the school.
The school said that the technology they will study with the EPA grant is intended to reduce air pollution and cut the health hazards to BBQ "pit masters" from propane-fueled cookers.
Charged with keeping America's air, water and soil clean, the EPA has been increasingly looking at homeowners, especially their use of pollution emitting tools like lawn mowers.
The school is proposing two fixes to reduce emissions from barbecues. First, they want to cut back on grease flare-ups. The idea: "A slotted and corrugated tray is inserted immediately prior to meat flipping, and removed immediately after. This short contact time prevents the tray from over-heating and volatilizing the collected grease. This collected grease will then drip off into a collection tray and can be used at the pit master's discretion."
- - -
The article goes on...but you get the idea.
Thank goodness they are doing this. I can't tell you how many bodies I step over in the streets and in backyards every summer as a result of that awful and perpetual propane death epidemic.
Fucking retarded nihilists. Is there any question that today's dimocrap party has moved to the far left and is looking to micromanage every single aspect of your lives?
I don't suppose anyone here enjoys grilling out during the summer months, do you?
If so, bad news. The EPA has their eye on you.
The Environmental Protection Agency has its eyes on pollution from backyard barbecues.
The agency announced that it is funding a University of California project to limit emissions resulting in grease drippings with a special tray to catch them and a "catalytic" filtration system.
The $15,000 project has the "potential for global application," said the school.
The school said that the technology they will study with the EPA grant is intended to reduce air pollution and cut the health hazards to BBQ "pit masters" from propane-fueled cookers.
Charged with keeping America's air, water and soil clean, the EPA has been increasingly looking at homeowners, especially their use of pollution emitting tools like lawn mowers.
The school is proposing two fixes to reduce emissions from barbecues. First, they want to cut back on grease flare-ups. The idea: "A slotted and corrugated tray is inserted immediately prior to meat flipping, and removed immediately after. This short contact time prevents the tray from over-heating and volatilizing the collected grease. This collected grease will then drip off into a collection tray and can be used at the pit master's discretion."
- - -
The article goes on...but you get the idea.
Thank goodness they are doing this. I can't tell you how many bodies I step over in the streets and in backyards every summer as a result of that awful and perpetual propane death epidemic.
Fucking retarded nihilists. Is there any question that today's dimocrap party has moved to the far left and is looking to micromanage every single aspect of your lives?
