Where are the global warming losers ?

Search
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/backyard-burger-and-wiener-roasts-targeted-by-epa/article/2561474

I don't suppose anyone here enjoys grilling out during the summer months, do you?

If so, bad news. The EPA has their eye on you.


The Environmental Protection Agency has its eyes on pollution from backyard barbecues.
The agency announced that it is funding a University of California project to limit emissions resulting in grease drippings with a special tray to catch them and a "catalytic" filtration system.
The $15,000 project has the "potential for global application," said the school.
The school said that the technology they will study with the EPA grant is intended to reduce air pollution and cut the health hazards to BBQ "pit masters" from propane-fueled cookers.
Charged with keeping America's air, water and soil clean, the EPA has been increasingly looking at homeowners, especially their use of pollution emitting tools like lawn mowers.
The school is proposing two fixes to reduce emissions from barbecues. First, they want to cut back on grease flare-ups. The idea: "A slotted and corrugated tray is inserted immediately prior to meat flipping, and removed immediately after. This short contact time prevents the tray from over-heating and volatilizing the collected grease. This collected grease will then drip off into a collection tray and can be used at the pit master's discretion."
- - -

The article goes on...but you get the idea.

Thank goodness they are doing this. I can't tell you how many bodies I step over in the streets and in backyards every summer as a result of that awful and perpetual propane death epidemic.

Fucking retarded nihilists. Is there any question that today's dimocrap party has moved to the far left and is looking to micromanage every single aspect of your lives?

These nazi bastards have no shame.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Is Ted Cruz really likening the science denying conservatives to Galileo??? Lmfao!!! Conservatives have absolutely no shame.

"Today, the global warming alarmists are the equivalent of the flat-Earthers. It used to be [that] it is accepted scientific wisdom the Earth is flat, and this heretic named Galileo was branded a denier."
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,391
Tokens
Is Ted Cruz really likening the science denying conservatives to Galileo??? Lmfao!!! Conservatives have absolutely no shame.

"Today, the global warming alarmists are the equivalent of the flat-Earthers. It used to be [that] it is accepted scientific wisdom the Earth is flat, and this heretic named Galileo was branded a denier."

There are still plenty of questions "global warming scientists" can't answer.

Edgar Allan Poe produced his best written work when he was drunk.

You do not. End of story.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,423
Tokens
Is Ted Cruz really likening the science denying conservatives to Galileo??? Lmfao!!! Conservatives have absolutely no shame.

"Today, the global warming alarmists are the equivalent of the flat-Earthers. It used to be [that] it is accepted scientific wisdom the Earth is flat, and this heretic named Galileo was branded a denier."

Oh yes he did!


"govt control of the energy sector and every aspect of our lives"

And no, the man has no fear exposing your Commie nut job ideology.

:aktion033
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
There are still plenty of questions "global warming scientists" can't answer.

Edgar Allan Poe produced his best written work when he was drunk.

You do not. End of story.

Ahhh, more drunk jokes. Really don't expect much more from science denying, racist conservatives, lol. You guys crack me up. So cute when you guys try to talk science.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
hqdefault.jpg
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,423
Tokens

Scientists Say New Study Is A ‘Death Blow’ To Global Warming Hysteria

A new study out of Germany casts further doubt on the so-called global warming “consensus” by suggesting the atmosphere may be less sensitive to increases in carbon dioxide emissions than most scientists think.

A study by scientists at Germany’s Max Planck Institute for Meteorology found that man-made aerosols had a much smaller cooling effect on the atmosphere during the 20th Century than was previously thought. Why is this big news? It means increases in carbon dioxide emissions likely cause less warming than most climate models suggest.

What do aerosols have to do with anything? Well, aerosols are created from human activities like burning coal, driving cars or from fires. There are also natural aerosols like clouds and fog. Aerosols tend toreflect solar energy back into space, giving them a cooling effect that somewhat offsets warming from increased CO2 emissions.

The Max Planck study suggests “that aerosol radiative forcing is less negative and more certain than is commonly believed.” In layman’s terms, aerosols are offsetting less global warming than was previously thought. And if aerosols aren’t causing as much cooling, it must mean carbon dioxide must be causing less warming than climate models predict.

“Going forward we should expect less warming from future greenhouse gas emissions than climate models are projecting,” write climate scientists Pat Michaels and Chip Knappenberger with the libertarian Cato Institute, adding that this study could be a “death blow” to global warming hysteria.

Independent climate researcher Nick Lewis put out a study last year with Georgia Tech’s Dr. Judith Curry that found that the climate’s response to a doubling of atmospheric CO2 levels — a measurement called “climate sensitivity” was 1.64 degrees Celsius.

Lewis revised his findings based on the Max Planck aerosol study and found something astounding: climate sensitivity drops dramatically. Lewis also looked at climate sensitivity estimates given by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — often regarded as the world’s top authority on global warming.


The IPCC’s latest assessment put climate sensitivity between 1.5 and 4.5 degrees Celsius. The IPCC says that despite “the large uncertainty range, there is a high confidence that aerosols have offset a substantial portion of [greenhouse gas] global mean forcing.”

http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/31/scientists-say-new-study-is-a-death-blow-to-global-warming-hysteria/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

But...but...but...

Really, REALLY smart dudes in academia said the science is settled!

How can this be?????

climategate-chicken-little-e1309043222847.jpg
latest
 

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
26,039
Tokens
The left are a bunch of sickos - end of story
 

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
26,039
Tokens
It's the end of September and the temp was in the high 80's today in the midwest..... Does that seem normal to you?

And high 70s low 80s here in the deep south. Abnormally cool.

How fkin stupid are global warming losers?

This is what I mean....none of you are able to think about things from any perspective except the one you want to see.

Al Gore told us 15 years ago we had 12 years to live.

Do you ever get out of the house or is the world too scary a place?

78° currently
 

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
16,094
Tokens
And high 70s low 80s here in the deep south. Abnormally cool.

How fkin stupid are global warming losers?

This is what I mean....none of you are able to think about things from any perspective except the one you want to see.

Al Gore told us 15 years ago we had 12 years to live.

Do you ever get out of the house or is the world too scary a place?

78° currently

First thing's first: Don't confuse 'weather' with 'climate'

You need to zoom out. Look at the crazy storms, the crazy heat waves, and the polar vortexes and shit. I'm not saying 'climate change' or whatever the fuck you wanna label it is man-made. But we're all pretty smart apes-- if we see our environment become less hospitable, maybe we could takes steps to prevent it happening?

Maybe we could take steps to prevent, slow, or reverse the effects and actually turn a buck on it? That used to be the American way. American Ingenuity. Profits in the solution.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,423
Tokens
First thing's first: Don't confuse 'weather' with 'climate'

You need to zoom out. Look at the crazy storms, the crazy heat waves, and the polar vortexes and shit. I'm not saying 'climate change' or whatever the fuck you wanna label it is man-made. But we're all pretty smart apes-- if we see our environment become less hospitable, maybe we could takes steps to prevent it happening?

Maybe we could take steps to prevent, slow, or reverse the effects and actually turn a buck on it? That used to be the American way. American Ingenuity. Profits in the solution.

Climate is what your moron "experts" predict, weather is what we get.

"Climate Change" Fun Fact of the Day:

While Arctic and Antarctic sea ice is increasing, did you know when Stonehenge was built, the Arctic was ice-free? CLIMATE CHANGE!!!!!

Literally everything you believe is a far left narrative devoid of facts - one scam after another cooked up by evildoers Normies wouldn't trust as their dog sitter.

Every. Single. Thing.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,423
Tokens
No its not!!! :pointer: Climate has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with predicting the weather.

GODDAMN YOU'RE DUMB

You believe in this bullshit cult narrative called "climate change", something that has literally been happening for billions of years.

Now THAT is dumb and beyond all hope!

WELCH!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,955
Messages
13,575,566
Members
100,888
Latest member
bj88gameslife
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com