Where are the global warming losers ?

[vitterd]

That fact that you cheered on the dumbest post on the topic is both expected and funny. You are so stupid it is embarrassing.

You will always be the dumbest poster....any forum. You are voted most worthless for a reason.

"See post #257"

 

[Acebb]

You will always be the dumbest poster....any forum. You are voted most worthless for a reason.

"See post #257"

Uh, you are so comically ignorant on the topic that you cheered on a complete imbecile. You are so fucking dumb it is unreal.

You have to love that the person who whined to a moderator that he only has 1 green bar is talking about "most worthless"

It is also so funny that you have to come here and make 30 posts before leaving for the day.

Hysterical.

 

[vitterd]

Uh, you are so comically ignorant on the topic that you cheered on a complete imbecile. You are so fucking dumb it is unreal.

You have to love that the person who whined to a moderator that he only has 1 green bar is talking about "most worthless"

It is also so funny that you have to come here and make 30 posts before leaving for the day.

Hysterical.

Another ace lie to add to list. Never once whined about green bars. I mocked them like I mock you.

You will be here all day again. 9k posts since 2012. Record pace.

Your name is Lying Ace and you were voted most worthless....how you can judge others is simply unreal and hysterical.

"It's cold in pa, therefore no global warming". Hahahahahah

 

[festeringZit]

Another ace lie to add to list. Never once whined about green bars. I mocked them like I mock you.

You will be here all day again. 9k posts since 2012. Record pace.

Your name is Lying Ace and you were voted most worthless....how you can judge others is simply unreal and hysterical.

"It's cold in pa, therefore no global warming". Hahahahahah

You keep mentioning this rubber room poll every single day in here, like it means something. I already debunked it. Create a real poll, and
let's see what the results are. Yawn.

 

[festeringZit]

Another ace lie to add to list. Never once whined about green bars. I mocked them like I mock you.

You will be here all day again. 9k posts since 2012. Record pace.

Your name is Lying Ace and you were voted most worthless....how you can judge others is simply unreal and hysterical.

"It's cold in pa, therefore no global warming". Hahahahahah

Funny how you've admitted in here many times that you have to clue about global warming, that you know nothing about it.

BUTTTTT, you believe in it and make fun of those that don't. Why? Because your idol the DNC tells you to. Can you say puppet?

 

[Acebb]

Another ace lie to add to list. Never once whined about green bars. I mocked them like I mock you.



"It's cold in pa, therefore no global warming". Hahahahahah

Uh, I've never said it is cold outside therefore no global warming.

HA HA HA HA you fucking lying idiot.

Here is you whining about green bars and the moderator mocking your posts in the political forum. "you of all people should know Why you don't have many"


HA HA HA HA you fucking lying idiot.

 

[Acebb]

You will be here all day again. 9k posts since 2012. Record pace.

Since I haven't been here "all day" well, ever, there can be no "again" idiot.

Hurry up, make 20 more posts before you leave to go cure cancer, dumb shit. Oh, and can you whine about your green bars ("If it went by posts in threads created") before you go?

I've never seen someone so proud of themselves for not being on this site for a whole 10 hours. My goodness, is your life pathetic.

 

[JDeuce]

Yes, we have 100% of the population of years that humans were burning fossil fuels. Why you would think we need a "larger" sample size to determine the effects of 100 years of pumping billions of tons of CO2 in the air is ridiculous. We can see the effects immediately of temperature change when a volcano erupts, we don't need to wait a million years to figure that out, lol. What an absolutely ridiculous argument.


No one knows how to reverse the process and take CO2 out of the atmosphere. Burning fossil fuels is not saving the Earth because we need that CO2. And 99% of the atmosphere is Nitrogen and Oxygen which are not green house gases and do not trap heat. So only 1% of the atmosphere is made up of gases that trap heat, which is pretty much what separates us from being a big ball of ice or having a habitable environment. When you look at it that way, it is much easier to comprehend why small % increases in CO2 in the atmosphere can have a significant change on the climate.


Even Big Oil has come to the Jesus moment that scientists are smarter than you and this whole "government conspiracy" nonsense is ridiculous and Global Warming is in fact real and a real threat to the environment.

So expert climate scientists, NASA, academia, and Big Oil are in agreement about global warming. The only group that's not is politicians and conservative bloggers. When ever people like you and the other clowns on this site are in agreement, it's almost a 100% fact that the opposite is true.

There is pretty much no real debate in the entire world of real climate scientists and academia when it comes to the facts behind global warming. It's laughable that you guys talk like there are serious questions on whether man made global warming is real.

1. Are you shitting me? I mean...seriously?

You don't understand why I would want to see data before the fossil fuel burning of humans and compare it to post-burning? You really can't understand why that's significant in this whole debate?

And FYI, fossil fuel burning began during the industrial revolution 250ish years ago. Let's see all the precisely accurate temperature records that were kept for the last 250 years.

2. No one is suggesting we need to burn more fossil fuels to save the Earth. The unanswered question is whether fossil fuel burning has a negative effect on the Earth's atmosphere.

3. All in agreement, huh?

What are they basing this agreement upon? Show me the data. Where is it? Show me their irrefutable data that says "Yep, when humans do x, y and z...then there is no doubt the atmosphere's reaction will be 1, 2 and 3...and that's harmful for the environment because a, b and c." Show me the hard data, Cochise. Let's see it.

Right now, the only "conclusions" we have are a bunch of...I wouldn't even call them educated guesses since so much (like the glaciers expanding, the frozen bodies of water, etc) does not support the theory that the globe is "warming." For someone who fancies himself as a statistic expert, you don't understand jackshit about causation or correlation. If I say "Every morning when I have bacon and eggs for breakfast, the Lakers have won this season"...it's coincidental, meaning one obviously has nothing to do with the other. That's what I'm suspecting is going on here with our tiny sample size.

I don't know why you enjoy being owned and abused day after day. Are you entirely sure you don't want me to track down the Indian guy I referenced a while back who liked being insulted and demeaned by strippers and get the two of you talking?

 

[Acebb]

Even Big Oil has come to the Jesus moment that scientists are smarter than you and this whole "government conspiracy" nonsense is ridiculous and Global Warming is in fact real and a real threat to the environment.

^ Absolute laughable lie.

 

[Acebb]

Y
There is pretty much no real debate in the entire world of real climate scientists and academia when it comes to the facts behind global warming.

Absolute laughable lie.

Here is a peer reviewed paper: the impact of anthropogenic global warming over the next century, and even as far as equilibrium many millennia hence, may be no more than one-third to one-half of IPCC’s current projections.

You are so fucking dumb and ignorant on this topic. You only comment on it because you are a troll.

 

[akphidelt]

1. Are you shitting me? I mean...seriously?

You don't understand why I would want to see data before the fossil fuel burning of humans and compare it to post-burning? You really can't understand why that's significant in this whole debate?

And FYI, fossil fuel burning began during the industrial revolution 250ish years ago. Let's see all the precisely accurate temperature records that were kept for the last 250 years.

It's not the significance of the whole debate. There is not a single scientist out there that needs to see "post-burning" data to know that the past 100 years of pumping billions of tons of CO2 in to the atmosphere causes warming. Just because you can't see and don't understand it, doesn't mean other intelligent people don't. Your argument is very dumb and not even something that people consider as a rational argument in the real world. This "Earth is old and we need a larger sample size" is such a stupid argument, lol. If the temperature is changing there is a reason, it's not magic.

2. No one is suggesting we need to burn more fossil fuels to save the Earth. The unanswered question is whether fossil fuel burning has a negative effect on the Earth's atmosphere.

The answer is yes, which has already been proven and known for decades.

3. All in agreement, huh?

What are they basing this agreement upon? Show me the data. Where is it? Show me their irrefutable data that says "Yep, when humans do x, y and z...then there is no doubt the atmosphere's reaction will be 1, 2 and 3...and that's harmful for the environment because a, b and c." Show me the hard data, Cochise. Let's see it.

Right now, the only "conclusions" we have are a bunch of...I wouldn't even call them educated guesses since so much (like the glaciers expanding, the frozen bodies of water, etc) does not support the theory that the globe is "warming." For someone who fancies himself as a statistic expert, you don't understand jackshit about causation or correlation. If I say "Every morning when I have bacon and eggs for breakfast, the Lakers have won this season"...it's coincidental, meaning one obviously has nothing to do with the other. That's what I'm suspecting is going on here with our tiny sample size.

I don't know why you enjoy being owned and abused day after day. Are you entirely sure you don't want me to track down the Indian guy I referenced a while back who liked being insulted and demeaned by strippers and get the two of you talking?

The glaciers are melting, sea levels are rising, the ocean is warming... those are pretty much facts that everyone in the community is in agreement with. And please don't bring up sea ice, we've been through that path for the past decade.

And you should realize, that if you are owning me in this conversation, you are owning pretty much the entire field of climate science with your dumb little questions that aren't even serious in the real world. So, as for you "owning anyone", I'll let you keep thinking that, but the intelligent community will understand how dumb you really are, lol.

There is plenty of evidence, data, and experiments demonstrating what is happening in the atmosphere. You just don't want to look. Even child-like experiments on YouTube, you can see the affects of Co2 blocking light. Just because you can't see, doesn't mean it's not there.

Your argument is very very primitive. Something you'd get out of Sarah Palin, lol. "The Earth is old, man can't change weather!"

 

[GasMan]

Two words

FALSIFIED DATA

What the fuck do you assclowns not understand?

Jesus christ, has there ever been a bigger assimilation of liberal jerk offs (except for the DNC) ever?

 

[akphidelt]

Two words

FALSIFIED DATA

What the fuck do you assclowns not understand?

Jesus christ, has there ever been a bigger assimilation of liberal jerk offs (except for the DNC) ever?

What falsified data are you talking about? Lol. There is a shit load of data that proves global warming. Which is why only conservative bloggers and their clown followers are the only people in the world that don't understand it. Come on Gas Man, you have the potential to be smarter than this. Try to be a better human being, you don't want to go running around looking like Ace, JDouche, and Sheriff Joe... that's declasse and obviously a sign that your thought process is all wrong.

 

[Acebb]

There is a shit load of data that proves global warming.

Actually, no there isn't.

LOL

There has been zero global warming for 218 months and counting

You are a comical dumb fuck and liar.

LOL

 

[BleedingPurple]

Utterly preposterous.

What is utterly preposterous?

 

[loomis41973]

this is the funniest post i have ever seen and should secure your spot as the stupidest person ever.

i am not a scientist, but i know what global warming claims entail. it is the inner core temperature of the earth that is rising. that has an effect on glaciers melting and breaking down the echo system that protects us. those 2 things are factually correct. does it mean that man is doing it????? although we probably aren't helping, i really am not qualified to say.

but to say that daily temperatures have anything to do with the global warming theories shows how retarded you are. it has nothing to do with the subject. so if it is cold outside, you think that disproves global warning???? that is fucking hilarious. so in the summer, when it is hot, i can claim global warning is true??? to see a bunch of idiots arguing about something they have no concept of is hilarious. hey dumb fucks, it is the inner earth's temperature they are talking about and has nothing to do with daily temperatures we experience. you should never post again.

Amazing you can type your name ....or spell scientist.azzkick(&^

 

[ScottL]

Where are the global warming losers ?


akphidelt

Global Warming Loser

Join Date Oct 2007
Location Anchorage
Posts 32,088

 

[loomis41973]

Where are the global warming losers ?


akphidelt

Global Warming Loser

Join Date Oct 2007
Location Anchorage
Posts 32,088

+1

Dude has a PHD in getting his ass handed to him and looking like a fool on damn near every topic he posts on.

The -15 shit is the best lately...he could could get -10 but wants to "prove a point"

 

[akphidelt]

Uh oh, another one of my obsessed pyscho stalkers has found his way down to the Poly. Welcome Loomis, your fellow right wing racist extremists will welcome you with open arms. Scott has become one of the extremist leaders... he'll show you the way around, lol.

I didn't want to prove any points, I made a claim and I backed it up. Not that big of a deal, lol. Only a psycho obsessed stalker would care about that.

 

[loomis41973]

Uh oh, another one of my obsessed pyscho stalkers has found his way down to the Poly. Welcome Loomis, your fellow right wing racist extremists will welcome you with open arms. Scott has become one of the extremist leaders... he'll show you the way around, lol.

I didn't want to prove any points, I made a claim and I backed it up. Not that big of a deal, lol. Only a psycho obsessed stalker would care about that.

you forgot the lol...
LOSER