<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jOviKCYyP3Y&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jOviKCYyP3Y&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
~~:<<
~~:<<
Why keep playing the character?
You know darn well many people have great counterpoints against you, but you never acknowledge it.
You just keep coming.
A well rounded, educated, and reasonable person will always be open to discussion.
You are as lost as some of the people you argue against.
Last edited:
Might be wasting my time here but I will try. There are different types of tumors (cancer) that arise from different cell types. Some respond very well to specific chemo protocols, some don´t. Some can be surgically removed, some can´t. The stage at which you start chemo will also determine your success, this is why early detection is so important. So it basically comes down to what type of cancer you have, how early it was diagnosed and how your body reacts to chemo.
Millions and millions of dollars are invested each year, you have the best scientists in the US doing cancer research in the best facilities available, I can guarantee you that you have no idea how complex this is. Chemo is getting better and better and it does work, not in every single case, but it is the best option you have.
You have absolutely no idea of what you´re talking about.
Those and people like me and you...In Canada kids across the country do the "Terry Fox run"
Terry Fox - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_Fox - the kid just started running, wanted to run across Canada and collect a dollar from each Canadian to donate for a cure...he didn't make it but pretty inspirational
I can´t be more specific regarding the fund raising. Sorry. I can tell you a bit about research though.
Research is being done at hundreds of facilites across the US. NIH has a branch called NCI (National Cancer Institute) which is very very impressive. Many universities do their own research, through their Medical and Veterinary Schools. Many Hospitals do their own research. Private institutions (Labs, Hospitals, Clinics, etc) in the Health Industry do their own research.
Are you implying that all this data, generated at many institutions by thousands of scientists, can be manipulated to alter results?
You ask about survival rate, didn´t you read my post about why you can´t generalize about cancer?, there is no such thing as an average cancer patient because there is no such thing as an average type of cancer.
LOL....normally I would have thrown you in the box for a time out for such insubordination, but I have instead chosen to make an example out of you...just in case anybody else has any foolish ideas about stepping out of line in one of my threads...
You are Profane...and clearly lack education as evidenced by your response...This is why it comes as no surprise to me that you could not "be more specific regarding the fund raising" As that is the most crucial element to understanding who is controlling The Medical Industry and their motivation behind their actions...
I specifically asked who "is investing those millions" for a reason...just to see if you had one iota of an understanding about influence....and clearly you do not...as evidence by your glaring endorsement of the National Cancer Institute...
Whom Do You Think Financed The Creation of this Rogue Organization? NGO's exist outside of the parameters of Government...and thus have no limit to their expenditure...Do You have the slightest clue the kind of influence an NGO has over these kinds of institutes....As they say Money Talks....
Were the Rockefeller's intentions Altruistic? Or was there more...?
The Name Of the Game Is Depopulation....
And this is the organization you chose to deem as "Impressive"? LOL....
I'm a show you how "Impressive" they are....
75% OF THE PHYSICIANS REFUSES CHEMOTHERAPY THEMSELVES
http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/2-physicians-refuse-chemo.html
The great lack of trust is evident even amongst doctors. Polls and questionnaires show that three doctors out of four (75 per cent) would refuse any chemotherapy because of its ineffectiveness against the disease and its devastating effects on the entire human organism. This is what many doctors and scientists have to say about chemotherapy:
“The majority of the cancer patients in this country die because of chemotherapy, which does not cure breast, colon or lung cancer. This has been documented for over a decade and nevertheless doctors still utilize chemotherapy to fight these tumors.” (Allen Levin, MD, UCSF, “The Healing of Cancer”, Marcus Books, 1990).
“If I were to contract cancer, I would never turn to a certain standard for the therapy of this disease. Cancer patients who stay away from these centers have some chance to make it.” (Prof. Gorge Mathe, “Scientific Medicine Stymied”, Medicines Nouvelles, Paris, 1989)
“Dr. Hardin Jones, lecturer at the University of California, after having analyzed for many decades statistics on cancer survival, has come to this conclusion: ‘… when not treated, the patients do not get worse or they even get better’. The unsettling conclusions of Dr. Jones have never been refuted”. (Walter Last, “The Ecologist”, Vol. 28, no. 2, March-April 1998)
“Many oncologists recommend chemotherapy for almost any type of cancer, with a faith that is unshaken by the almost constant failures”.(Albert Braverman, MD, “Medical Oncology in the 90s”, Lancet, 1991, Vol. 337, p. 901)
“Our most efficacious regimens are loaded with risks, side effects and practical problems; and after all the patients we have treated have paid the toll, only a miniscule percentage of them is paid off with an ephemeral period of tumoral regression and generally a partial one” (Edward G. Griffin “World Without Cancer”, American Media Publications, 1996)
“After all, and for the overwhelming majority of the cases, there is no proof whatsoever that chemotherapy prolongs survival expectations. And this is the great lie about this therapy, that there is a correlation between the reduction of cancer and the extension of the life of the patient”. (Philip Day, “Cancer: Why we’re still dying to know the truth”, Credence Publications, 2000)
“Several full-time scientists at the McGill Cancer Center sent to 118 doctors, all experts on lung cancer, a questionnaire to determine the level of trust they had in the therapies they were applying; they were asked to imagine that they themselves had contracted the disease and which of the six current experimental therapies they would choose. 79 doctors answered, 64 of them said that they would not consent to undergo any treatment containing cis-platinum – one of the common chemotherapy drugs they used – while 58 out of 79 believed that all the experimental therapies above were not accepted because of the ineffectiveness and the elevated level of toxicity of chemotherapy.” (Philip Day, “Cancer: Why we’re still dying to know the truth”, Credence Publications, 2000)
“Doctor Ulrich Able, a German epidemiologist of the Heidelberg Mannheim Tumor Clinic, has exhaustively analyzed and reviewed all the main studies and clinical experiments ever performed on chemotherapy .... Able discovered that the comprehensive world rate of positive outcomes because of chemotherapy was frightening, because, simply, nowhere was scientific evidence available demonstrating that chemotherapy is able to ‘prolong in any appreciable way the life of patients affected by the most common type of organ cancer.’ Able highlights that rarely can chemotherapy improve the quality of life, and he describes it as a scientific squalor while maintaining that at least 80 per cent of chemotherapy administered in the world is worthless. Even if there is no scientific proof whatsoever that chemotherapy works, neither doctors nor patients are prepared to give it up (Lancet, Aug. 10, 1991).
None of the main media has ever mentioned this exhaustive study: it has been completely buried” (Tim O’Shea, “Chemotherapy – An Unproven Procedure”)
“According to medical associations, the notorious and dangerous side effects of drugs have become the fourth main cause of death after infarction, cancer, and apoplexy” ( Journal of the American Medical Association, April 15, 1998)
Also see: Chemo destroys brain cells
http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/2-physicians-refuse-chemo.html
The great lack of trust is evident even amongst doctors. Polls and questionnaires show that three doctors out of four (75 per cent) would refuse any chemotherapy because of its ineffectiveness against the disease and its devastating effects on the entire human organism. This is what many doctors and scientists have to say about chemotherapy:
“The majority of the cancer patients in this country die because of chemotherapy, which does not cure breast, colon or lung cancer. This has been documented for over a decade and nevertheless doctors still utilize chemotherapy to fight these tumors.” (Allen Levin, MD, UCSF, “The Healing of Cancer”, Marcus Books, 1990).
“If I were to contract cancer, I would never turn to a certain standard for the therapy of this disease. Cancer patients who stay away from these centers have some chance to make it.” (Prof. Gorge Mathe, “Scientific Medicine Stymied”, Medicines Nouvelles, Paris, 1989)
“Dr. Hardin Jones, lecturer at the University of California, after having analyzed for many decades statistics on cancer survival, has come to this conclusion: ‘… when not treated, the patients do not get worse or they even get better’. The unsettling conclusions of Dr. Jones have never been refuted”. (Walter Last, “The Ecologist”, Vol. 28, no. 2, March-April 1998)
“Many oncologists recommend chemotherapy for almost any type of cancer, with a faith that is unshaken by the almost constant failures”.(Albert Braverman, MD, “Medical Oncology in the 90s”, Lancet, 1991, Vol. 337, p. 901)
“Our most efficacious regimens are loaded with risks, side effects and practical problems; and after all the patients we have treated have paid the toll, only a miniscule percentage of them is paid off with an ephemeral period of tumoral regression and generally a partial one” (Edward G. Griffin “World Without Cancer”, American Media Publications, 1996)
“After all, and for the overwhelming majority of the cases, there is no proof whatsoever that chemotherapy prolongs survival expectations. And this is the great lie about this therapy, that there is a correlation between the reduction of cancer and the extension of the life of the patient”. (Philip Day, “Cancer: Why we’re still dying to know the truth”, Credence Publications, 2000)
“Several full-time scientists at the McGill Cancer Center sent to 118 doctors, all experts on lung cancer, a questionnaire to determine the level of trust they had in the therapies they were applying; they were asked to imagine that they themselves had contracted the disease and which of the six current experimental therapies they would choose. 79 doctors answered, 64 of them said that they would not consent to undergo any treatment containing cis-platinum – one of the common chemotherapy drugs they used – while 58 out of 79 believed that all the experimental therapies above were not accepted because of the ineffectiveness and the elevated level of toxicity of chemotherapy.” (Philip Day, “Cancer: Why we’re still dying to know the truth”, Credence Publications, 2000)
“Doctor Ulrich Able, a German epidemiologist of the Heidelberg Mannheim Tumor Clinic, has exhaustively analyzed and reviewed all the main studies and clinical experiments ever performed on chemotherapy .... Able discovered that the comprehensive world rate of positive outcomes because of chemotherapy was frightening, because, simply, nowhere was scientific evidence available demonstrating that chemotherapy is able to ‘prolong in any appreciable way the life of patients affected by the most common type of organ cancer.’ Able highlights that rarely can chemotherapy improve the quality of life, and he describes it as a scientific squalor while maintaining that at least 80 per cent of chemotherapy administered in the world is worthless. Even if there is no scientific proof whatsoever that chemotherapy works, neither doctors nor patients are prepared to give it up (Lancet, Aug. 10, 1991).
None of the main media has ever mentioned this exhaustive study: it has been completely buried” (Tim O’Shea, “Chemotherapy – An Unproven Procedure”)
“According to medical associations, the notorious and dangerous side effects of drugs have become the fourth main cause of death after infarction, cancer, and apoplexy” ( Journal of the American Medical Association, April 15, 1998)
Also see: Chemo destroys brain cells
Fuck ER and Grey's Anatomy... - Loren78
Chemotherapy Programs: Unacceptable and Ineffective
When the cure is worse than the sickness
http://www.douglassreport.com/dailydose/dd...dd20020830.html
To understand the utter hypocrisy of chemotherapy, consider the following:
The McGill Cancer Center in Canada, one of the largest and most prestigious cancer treatment centers in the world, did a study of oncologists to determine how they would respond to a diagnosis of cancer. On the confidential questionnaire, 58 out of 64 doctors said that all chemotherapy programs were unacceptable to them and their family members. The overriding reason for this decision was that the drugs are ineffective and have an unacceptable degree of toxicity. These are the same doctors who will tell you that their chemotherapy treatments will shrink your tumor and prolong your life!
Thirty years ago, I worked with a radiologist who told me this: "If I get cancer, I'm going to Mexico." So if you get cancer, don't call your doctor; call your travel agent.
There are alternative treatments available, but you will have to run the gamut of outraged chemotherapists, radiologists, and surgeons to find one. They will use cajolery, insults, fear, threats ("If you do this, I am off the case"), and misrepresentation to dissuade you.
Two excellent clinics offering alternative treatments are the following:
Burton Clinic
P.O. Box 42689
Freeport, Grand Bahama Island
Tel. (242)352-7455
Fax (242)352-3201
www.iatclinic.com
Burzynski Clinic
9432 Old Katy Rd.
Houston, TX 77055
Tel. (713)335-5697
Fax (713)335-5699
www.cancermed.com
Also, doctors affiliated with The American College for Advancement in Medicine may be able to provide a promising therapy called photochemotherapy-in which a small portion (a glassful) of blood is withdrawn from the patient's vein, exposed to ultraviolet light and then injected back into the patient's body.
Read Questioning Chemotherapy, by Ralph Moss, Equinox Press. (I've seen it on Amazon.com for less than 15 bucks). This book is a must for all concerned about this medical scandal - a chamber of horrors that doctors don't want to talk about.
Chemotherapy Programs: Unacceptable and Ineffective
When the cure is worse than the sickness
http://www.douglassreport.com/dailydose/dd...dd20020830.html
To understand the utter hypocrisy of chemotherapy, consider the following:
The McGill Cancer Center in Canada, one of the largest and most prestigious cancer treatment centers in the world, did a study of oncologists to determine how they would respond to a diagnosis of cancer. On the confidential questionnaire, 58 out of 64 doctors said that all chemotherapy programs were unacceptable to them and their family members. The overriding reason for this decision was that the drugs are ineffective and have an unacceptable degree of toxicity. These are the same doctors who will tell you that their chemotherapy treatments will shrink your tumor and prolong your life!
Thirty years ago, I worked with a radiologist who told me this: "If I get cancer, I'm going to Mexico." So if you get cancer, don't call your doctor; call your travel agent.
There are alternative treatments available, but you will have to run the gamut of outraged chemotherapists, radiologists, and surgeons to find one. They will use cajolery, insults, fear, threats ("If you do this, I am off the case"), and misrepresentation to dissuade you.
Two excellent clinics offering alternative treatments are the following:
Burton Clinic
P.O. Box 42689
Freeport, Grand Bahama Island
Tel. (242)352-7455
Fax (242)352-3201
www.iatclinic.com
Burzynski Clinic
9432 Old Katy Rd.
Houston, TX 77055
Tel. (713)335-5697
Fax (713)335-5699
www.cancermed.com
Also, doctors affiliated with The American College for Advancement in Medicine may be able to provide a promising therapy called photochemotherapy-in which a small portion (a glassful) of blood is withdrawn from the patient's vein, exposed to ultraviolet light and then injected back into the patient's body.
Read Questioning Chemotherapy, by Ralph Moss, Equinox Press. (I've seen it on Amazon.com for less than 15 bucks). This book is a must for all concerned about this medical scandal - a chamber of horrors that doctors don't want to talk about.
