West Coast/Pac-10 Week 02

Search

Homer bets kill me!
Joined
Sep 14, 2006
Messages
4,105
Tokens
Hello Cappin Guru....

Here's a little refresher for you... not that I wish to rub it in butttttttttttttttt......







It appears to be accolade time once again for Rahim Moore Mr. Guru.

From what I've seen in this game up to now --
Alteraun Verner+Rahim Moore > Eric Berry+Misc.



Recap:

Crisakes, a garbage TD with 10 seconds left in the game wasted a perfectly good UW cover. Who the hell left the back door open? I wish I would have caught the opening line at 18½. (42-23 final.) We will soon see Udubs true colors.
Grrrrrrrrrrrr.

Fresno St.+8½/Wisc.* (W)
Oregon St.-6½/UNLV*
UW-20½/Idaho ½*
(L)
UW-21/Idaho ½*
(L)
WSU+2½/Hawaii ½*
WSU+3/Hawaii ½*
WSU/Hawaii U50½ ½*
WSU/Hawaii U53* ½*
USC -5½/OSU*
(GOW)
USC -5/OSU**
(GOW)

LOL okay.

Wow...

It's all I can say about the way Stanford, UCLA, and Washington State turned out.

Eric Berry is still the better player. I'll fight you to the end on that one.

That Freshman QB looked awesome during the game and really didn't get bothered too much by the noise that was going on in Neyland Stadium.

The Vols do it to me again!

... Washington State is really, really bad.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
LOL okay.

Wow...

It's all I can say about the way Stanford, UCLA, and Washington State turned out.

Eric Berry is still the better player. I'll fight you to the end on that one.

That Freshman QB looked awesome during the game and really didn't get bothered too much by the noise that was going on in Neyland Stadium.

The Vols do it to me again!

... Washington State is really, really bad.

Well Guru, at least we see things equally well.

What happened to me yesterday was a perfect storm that I haven't experienced in more than 2 years.

USC... all credit goes to Tressel for game-planning a defense that held USC down for 56 minutes. As it turned out, I was correct about Barkley but I was wrong about the surrounding cast. USC lost this bet not because of him, but because of their OL that failed to protect him through more than 3/4 of the game. I lost my big play because the ONE thing above all things I was the most sure of Saturday, USC's OL, was soundly beaten for those first 56 minutes. OSU's DL and LB's put tons of pressure on the true freshman QB. When he had time, he was as sharp as any QB you will ever see. I never saw that coming and if I had it to do all over again, I'd have probably picked the same way again. USC laying less than a TD will win 90%+ of the time. Fuckit.

Udub, back door, still hurts my ass to sit down.

WSU, I drank the wrong kool-aid. My mistake.

OSU, everything was going along just fine until UNLV pulled their starter in the 4th and plugged in their backup Claussen. FWIW. The Beaver defense was stellar except for that 4th quarter when UNLV threw an unexpected spin at them by changing QB's. That might be a bit too much for a young team to handle in the 2nd week. Maybe it was his play calling or how he handled the offense differently that threw the Beaver defense for a loop. I see this happen sometimes but also sometimes the backup gets beat. Whatever, at least the team that played the better game won it.

I think I'm down a couple units now for the season. I can handle that. This past week to me is something to put behind and I will definitely keep the info flowing, maybe turn up the volume even more to allow for opponents that I don't know well to get their licks in.

PS... and I never thought I'd say this but thank you Pat Hill for being a beacon of light for me on a very stormy Saturday.

results:

W/L 1-5 -6 damn units
Season:
6-7 (-2 units)
 

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2007
Messages
3,472
Tokens
USC... I was correct about Barkley but I was wrong about the surrounding cast. USC lost this bet not because of him, but because of their OL that failed to protect him through more than 3/4 of the game. I lost my big play because the ONE thing above all things I was the most sure of Saturday, USC's OL, was soundly beaten for those first 56 minutes. OSU's DL and LB's put tons of pressure on the true freshman QB. When he had time, he was as sharp as any QB you will ever see.

The problem yesterday and even in the first game against SJSU is that Barkley doesn't have very good pocket presence yet, and is pretty immobile as well (which is more of Corp's strength obviously). Barkley's foot work needs to improve quite a bit too - he's yet to step up in the pocket or be able to feel the direction of the rush/blitzes and sidestep to avoid them. Overall, he's throwing a bit too flat-footed and relying too much on his accurate arm. I think some deeper drops would help too.

The larger concern at this point is the tempo of the offense - stuck in the mud without any rhythm. I realize it's a pro-set, but there's no need to drain so much of the play clock which allows the opposing defenses too much time to get into their stunts. This becomes even more evident when playing on the road in tough conditions, which the Trojans will see numerous more times this season - at Cal, Notre Dame, Oregon.. even next week in Seattle could be trouble.

All that being said, it was an excellent, gritty win and the true freshman performed quite admirably. But there's a handful of far more balanced offenses and far superior QB's that 'SC will have to face this year, so this is definitely a work in progress.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 1998
Messages
23,315
Tokens
The problem yesterday and even in the first game against SJSU is that Barkley doesn't have very good pocket presence yet, and is pretty immobile as well (which is more of Corp's strength obviously). Barkley's foot work needs to improve quite a bit too - he's yet to step up in the pocket or be able to feel the direction of the rush/blitzes and sidestep to avoid them. Overall, he's throwing a bit too flat-footed and relying too much on his accurate arm. I think some deeper drops would help too.

The larger concern at this point is the tempo of the offense - stuck in the mud without any rhythm. I realize it's a pro-set, but there's no need to drain so much of the play clock which allows the opposing defenses too much time to get into their stunts. This becomes even more evident when playing on the road in tough conditions, which the Trojans will see numerous more times this season - at Cal, Notre Dame, Oregon.. even next week in Seattle could be trouble.

All that being said, it was an excellent, gritty win and the true freshman performed quite admirably. But there's a handful of far more balanced offenses and far superior QB's that 'SC will have to face this year, so this is definitely a work in progress.

Thank you for your opinion HK, but I beg to differ on a few points. Barkley's footwork and his pocket presence is a thing of beauty, but OSU was slinging mud on him all evening and anyone in their right mind would have been flushed with the lack of protection he was getting. I do agree that Corp is more mobile, but I don't think his football instincts are anything near Barkley's. Not even close. He's much more redshirt freshman than Barkley is true freshman.

You are way off on that one my friend. USC's offense would be far different than it is with Corp in there instead of Barkley. Are you sure you watched the game? Didn't you notice all the pressure on Barkley from every direction? Teams don't normally get away with that when they play USC. There isn't a QB living today that could have handled that any differently unless they were a scrambler which is not Barkley's forte, but he's not inept and getting away from the pass rush either. He is the quintessential pro-set pocket passer.

Barkley never got flustered, just hit and hurried a lot. He had his wits about him after all that harrassment during the game and confidently lead USC down the field to win in the clutch like few QB's could do. Just the great ones pull off that sort of thing and this was only his first big game away from home.

Next time you get the opportunity to see a replay, just compare the difference between his moves when he was under pressure for the frst 3 quarters... much like anyone in that situation, compared to the last 4 minutes of the game when he did get the time and protection he didn't get before. He looked more like Joe Montana than a rookie QB that doesn't have his footwork down or the technique to drop back in the pocket and throws off the wrong foot.

USC's problematical defense (?) wasn't even near the heart of the issue. Dare say without it USC wouldn't have gone into the half tied 10-10. Their OL was beat for 56 minutes and when that happens, fuck tempo, fuck pocket presence, fuck QB rating, fuck everything. It wasn't Barkley's fault.

However I think the silver lining in this is a good lesson for USC's OL. I would have said that this game was their way of the oldsters hazing the new boy if I didn't know better.

I know what needs to be done to defeat the kind of defense OSU was throwing at the Trojans. Barkley and his receivers need to work on their timing routes more so anyone that stacks the box will come under attack from all angles with quick hitting passes -- to move the ball that way instead of using almost exclusively a variety of rushing plays. More WC offense. That should shake up linebackers plenty. If Joe Montana did it, so can Matt Barkley.
 

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
2,800
Tokens
USC's problematical defense (?) wasn't even near the heart of the issue. Dare say without it USC wouldn't have gone into the half tied 10-10. Their OL was beat for 56 minutes and when that happens, fuck tempo, fuck pocket presence, fuck QB rating, fuck everything. It wasn't Barkley's fault.

However I think the silver lining in this is a good lesson for USC's OL. I would have said that this game was their way of the oldsters hazing the new boy if I didn't know better.

I know what needs to be done to defeat the kind of defense OSU was throwing at the Trojans. Barkley and his receivers need to work on their timing routes more so anyone that stacks the box will come under attack from all angles with quick hitting passes -- to move the ball that way instead of using almost exclusively a variety of rushing plays. More WC offense. That should shake up linebackers plenty. If Joe Montana did it, so can Matt Barkley.


Damn, how much Barkley kool-aid are you drinking?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2007
Messages
3,472
Tokens
Conan - Never said anything about how Corp should be in there instead of Barkley - just simply that Corp's strength (mobility) just so happens to be Barkley's weakness at this point. No question that Barkley should be the starter.

Didn't say anything about the defense being problematic either. Obviously they kept giving the offense a chance.

Again, the tempo of the offense needs to dramatically increase, especially on the road in loud environments. Otherwise, the crowd continues to roar anticipating the snap and the DL licks their chops anticipating yet another long, drawn-out sweep play to the left or right. I promise you that the 'SC from last night would've *easily* lost by 14+ in Bezerkeley. I'm still not sold on Riley, but he's got a much better head on him than Pryor and, of course, far better skilled position players to support him. 'SC wouldn't have escaped Cal last night and while I know that Cal's not the topic at hand right now, I'm just trying to give an example of a far more balanced opponent 'SC will have to face on the road.

I can see how my reply came off as a criticism of Barkley, but that wasn't my intention actually. At this point, while I'm happy that Sarkisian finally left, the play calling needs a lot of work where, imo, an increased tempo needs to be the focus.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,967
Messages
13,575,642
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com