- Status
LOL@this thread...
<hr color="#c0c0c0" width="630"> <table border="0" cellpadding="3" width="630"><tbody><tr><td>
</td><td>
</td></tr></tbody></table>
Total...You'd be surprised at how many folks still believe This is Atta boarding at Boston Logan.....
The FBI claims he left a Flight Manual in his rental car, at Boston Logan.
Question...
Why would Atta leave a rental car containing incriminating evidence at Logan Airport, rent another car in Boston to drive to Maine, then fly back to Boston again?
:missingte:missingte:missingte:missingte:missingte
Total...You Believe This Shyt?
Let See What The 911 Commission said...
I Second Totals Challenge....Show Me Proof Any One of the 19 Hijackers Boarded Planes that Were Not Scheduled to Fly on 911....Especially the ones who turned up alive, the very next day.....LMAO
<hr color="#c0c0c0" width="630"> <table border="0" cellpadding="3" width="630"><tbody><tr><td>
Total...You'd be surprised at how many folks still believe This is Atta boarding at Boston Logan.....
The FBI claims he left a Flight Manual in his rental car, at Boston Logan.
Question...
Why would Atta leave a rental car containing incriminating evidence at Logan Airport, rent another car in Boston to drive to Maine, then fly back to Boston again?
:missingte:missingte:missingte:missingte:missingte
Total...You Believe This Shyt?
Let See What The 911 Commission said...
I Second Totals Challenge....Show Me Proof Any One of the 19 Hijackers Boarded Planes that Were Not Scheduled to Fly on 911....Especially the ones who turned up alive, the very next day.....LMAO
Sunday, 23 September, 2001, 12:30 GMT 13:30 UK Hijack 'suspects' alive and well
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
A man called Waleed Al Shehri says he left the US a year ago
Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well.
The identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt.
Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September.
His photograph was released, and has since appeared in newspapers and on television around the world.
Now he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco.
He told journalists there that he had nothing to do with the attacks on New York and Washington, and had been in Morocco when they happened. He has contacted both the Saudi and American authorities, according to Saudi press reports.
He acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Daytona Beach in the United States, and is indeed the same Waleed Al Shehri to whom the FBI has been referring.
But, he says, he left the United States in September last year, became a pilot with Saudi Arabian airlines and is currently on a further training course in Morocco.
Mistaken identity
Abdulaziz Al Omari, another of the Flight 11 hijack suspects, has also been quoted in Arab news reports.
<table align="right" border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="3" width="150"><tbody><tr><td>Abdelaziz Al Omari 'lost his passport in Denver'
</td></tr></tbody></table> He says he is an engineer with Saudi Telecoms, and that he lost his passport while studying in Denver.
Another man with exactly the same name surfaced on the pages of the English-language Arab News.
The second Abdulaziz Al Omari is a pilot for Saudi Arabian Airlines, the report says.
Meanwhile, Asharq Al Awsat newspaper, a London-based Arabic daily, says it has interviewed Saeed Alghamdi.
<table align="right" border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="3" width="150"><tbody><tr><td>Khalid Al-Midhar may also be alive
</td></tr></tbody></table>
He was listed by the FBI as a hijacker in the United flight that crashed in Pennsylvania.
And there are suggestions that another suspect, Khalid Al Midhar, may also be alive.
FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.
LOL- Hey Loren!! This is why Mr MJ loses the bet. Even if you allow the photos to stand alone as evidence as he says he wants to do there is a problem. Did you notice it?
Whats the difference between the screen capture of the airport surveillance video of ATTA above at Portland Airport at exactly 5:53 AM for a connecting flight to Boston.- and the one below at Dulles Airport at? What time? What date fer Chrissakes?
The bottom photo is clearly a fake. Why? Have you ever seen an airport security camera photograph that doesnt have a DATE AND TIME STAMP on it?
Just this single terminal at Dulles Airport has over 100 such cameras, every one of them with an individual camera ID number and date:time clock of its own.
Airport security tapes also display a code identification number as to which security area the camera is located.
So what Mr MJ put up cannot possibly be from any airport surveillance video!!!!!!
Therefore he loses the bet.
ladies and gentlemen of the jury- I rest my case.
Six of the 19 suicide hijackers identified by the FBI shortly after the attack by name, photograph, and other personal details reported themselves alive…
Are they lying?
IM me for my PayPal address Mr MJ. You owe me $20. And remember- you dont want to be a WELCHER- do you now? Pay up NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LMFAO!!!!
TR, I paid you $140 dollars, $20 for the bet in the "Watch the Dow Drop" thread and an additional $120 on our sidebet for every 100 points lower the Dow moved. Had you lost $140 would I have received it?
Based upon what I'm reading here I'm starting to wonder. You lost this bet. And you are using semantics to avoid settlement.
And while I'm here, please, PLEASE stop trying to outkook Lauren. She's out of your league [that's a good thing]!
Oh one more thing -- CRAZY ISLAMIC RADICALS WHO DIDN'T WANT TO DIE BRAINWASHED OTHER CRAZY ISLAMIC RADICALS WITH DREAMS OF PARADISE UPON DEATH, INTO BECOMING HUMAN BOMBS, AND 'SUCCESSFULLY' EXECUTED THE MURDER OF THOUSANDS OF AMERICANS -- JESUS!!!
Based upon what I'm reading here I'm starting to wonder. You lost this bet. And you are using semantics to avoid settlement.
And while I'm here, please, PLEASE stop trying to outkook Lauren. She's out of your league [that's a good thing]!
Oh one more thing -- CRAZY ISLAMIC RADICALS WHO DIDN'T WANT TO DIE BRAINWASHED OTHER CRAZY ISLAMIC RADICALS WITH DREAMS OF PARADISE UPON DEATH, INTO BECOMING HUMAN BOMBS, AND 'SUCCESSFULLY' EXECUTED THE MURDER OF THOUSANDS OF AMERICANS -- JESUS!!!
<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eUyLwXhqlWU&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eUyLwXhqlWU&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>
The bet has been won by the rules posted.Pay up or Welch
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/uLEqjpHVPhM&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/uLEqjpHVPhM&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
:cripwalk:
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/uLEqjpHVPhM&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/uLEqjpHVPhM&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
:cripwalk:
LOL....you do realize that footage was not filmed at Washington Dulles...
And ummm...even if it was...did Khalid al-Mihdhar buy himself a first class ticket to the ressurection?
Because He is Still Alive...
Flight 77...of course was the plane that allegedly took off from Dulles International...I assume MJ...that you believe Hani Hanjour boarded Flight 77 from there as well....Even Though He Did Not Have a Ticket nor was his name on the Flight Manifest
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/graphics/attack/hijackers.html
Question
How Does One Board A Plane Without a Ticket?
Answer
They Don't
[/QUOTE]
<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR title="Post 6597012" vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 align=middle width=125>Scott L</TD><TD class=alt1>TR, I paid you $140 dollars, $20 for the bet in the "Watch the Dow Drop" thread and an additional $120 on our sidebet for every 100 points lower the Dow moved. Had you lost $140 would I have received it?
Based upon what I'm reading here I'm starting to wonder. You lost this bet. And you are using semantics to avoid settlement.
And while I'm here, please, PLEASE stop trying to outkook Lauren. She's out of your league [that's a good thing]!
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Scotty- the video is a KNOWN FAKE- as fake as the Bin Laden tapes using guys with changing facial features.
Listen -You and I have an agreement- unwritten- you stay out of my Kook business and I dont plead for the Palestinians.
Now- with this comment about this bet I just won plus this comment about Loren who you must know I have an alliance with- dont you think you are crossing the line?
Lets not go there OK?
I know- your only saying we had a bet- and of course I would have paid. I paid GTC08 when I lost the VP stakes bet didnt I? I pay like everyone else when I lose.
But beyond that- you are s-oooooo wrong about me losing this bet.
This video came out 4 years after 9/11 as a result of a successful lawsuit against the government brought by people who lost loved ones on 9/11 and wanted answers as to what really happened instead of lies.
They put this thing together and tried to pass it off as proof- kind of like them being forced to release surveillance videos of planes hitting the Pentagon and getting a couple stills strung together and calling that proof.
So many things wrong with this tape. Ill go through them if you like. Its as if they are saying - "who cares - we know youll believe its authentic." Because we say it is."
But at the end of the day all these other things dont matter.
This is not a real surveillance video. Because all airport surveillance videos have a time and date stamp.
Period. OK?
If you cannot show me a real surveillance video then you lose the bet. Mr MJ did not.
Period. OK?
If you want to get in on the controversy- then perhaps you'd like to answer one question -besides Lorens correct assertion that some of these Dulles airport boys are known to be alive!
If this video is authentic then where is the required time date stamp?
Answer that before you go declaring anyone has lost the bet.
After you realize that it cannot be authentic without a time and date stamp then you would see that I win the bet- not lose it.
That is what has happened here.
So tell your friend Mr MJ that he lost this bet six ways from Sunday because thats what he did.
1st- when he showed up a photograph when my rules state you must supply a video. His argument I should have said "moving video" is the epitomy of stupidity. Do you go to You tube to watch "moving videos" or just videos"? Talk about trying to worm your way out of being wrong. Pathetic excuse for not reading the rules. Apparently Mr MJ has his own special vocabulary he wants to impose on the rest of the world but they arent buying it and neither am I.
2nd- when he showed up with the video that the stills came from (congrats Mr MJ-you finally found it- took you long enough) I also knew youd throw it out there like throwing sh*t on the wall regardless of the fact its condemmed to the now rather full trash bin of 9/11 disinfo hampered by the same handicap as the photos you threw out there.- NO DATE AND TIME STAMP.
Both flimsy attempts failed.
So he loses.
Its up to him to pay up or welch- not me.
Still laughing at his "moving video" excuse.
Comedy gold...
Based upon what I'm reading here I'm starting to wonder. You lost this bet. And you are using semantics to avoid settlement.
And while I'm here, please, PLEASE stop trying to outkook Lauren. She's out of your league [that's a good thing]!
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Scotty- the video is a KNOWN FAKE- as fake as the Bin Laden tapes using guys with changing facial features.
Listen -You and I have an agreement- unwritten- you stay out of my Kook business and I dont plead for the Palestinians.
Now- with this comment about this bet I just won plus this comment about Loren who you must know I have an alliance with- dont you think you are crossing the line?
Lets not go there OK?
I know- your only saying we had a bet- and of course I would have paid. I paid GTC08 when I lost the VP stakes bet didnt I? I pay like everyone else when I lose.
But beyond that- you are s-oooooo wrong about me losing this bet.
This video came out 4 years after 9/11 as a result of a successful lawsuit against the government brought by people who lost loved ones on 9/11 and wanted answers as to what really happened instead of lies.
They put this thing together and tried to pass it off as proof- kind of like them being forced to release surveillance videos of planes hitting the Pentagon and getting a couple stills strung together and calling that proof.
So many things wrong with this tape. Ill go through them if you like. Its as if they are saying - "who cares - we know youll believe its authentic." Because we say it is."
But at the end of the day all these other things dont matter.
This is not a real surveillance video. Because all airport surveillance videos have a time and date stamp.
Period. OK?
If you cannot show me a real surveillance video then you lose the bet. Mr MJ did not.
Period. OK?
If you want to get in on the controversy- then perhaps you'd like to answer one question -besides Lorens correct assertion that some of these Dulles airport boys are known to be alive!
If this video is authentic then where is the required time date stamp?
Answer that before you go declaring anyone has lost the bet.
After you realize that it cannot be authentic without a time and date stamp then you would see that I win the bet- not lose it.
That is what has happened here.
So tell your friend Mr MJ that he lost this bet six ways from Sunday because thats what he did.
1st- when he showed up a photograph when my rules state you must supply a video. His argument I should have said "moving video" is the epitomy of stupidity. Do you go to You tube to watch "moving videos" or just videos"? Talk about trying to worm your way out of being wrong. Pathetic excuse for not reading the rules. Apparently Mr MJ has his own special vocabulary he wants to impose on the rest of the world but they arent buying it and neither am I.
2nd- when he showed up with the video that the stills came from (congrats Mr MJ-you finally found it- took you long enough) I also knew youd throw it out there like throwing sh*t on the wall regardless of the fact its condemmed to the now rather full trash bin of 9/11 disinfo hampered by the same handicap as the photos you threw out there.- NO DATE AND TIME STAMP.
Both flimsy attempts failed.
So he loses.
Its up to him to pay up or welch- not me.
Still laughing at his "moving video" excuse.
Comedy gold...
I provided exactly what you asked for in the rules.
~~:<<
C'mon I don't have all day to collect my bills...payup Mr. Slowpay...or is your middle name Welcher? :think2:
Originally Posted by Total Recall View Post
Andrew Jackson, and I will take longer all comers.
Sorry Sweet Lou, no Welcher is allowed.
If anyone of you gentlemen think you can easily show me an airport surveillance video of any 9/11 hijacker, and you've got 19 chances right, going through the metal detectors at any of the airports where they hijacked planes let me know and I'll give you a week to try to find one. At the end of the week, if you can find it $20 PayPal from me to you. If you can't $20 to me. Sounds like a great deal doesn't it? I mean, surveillance videos run 24/7 and are always pointed at the metal detectors. So step right up, who wants to be the first to make some quick cash?
~~:<<
C'mon I don't have all day to collect my bills...payup Mr. Slowpay...or is your middle name Welcher? :think2:
Originally Posted by Total Recall View Post
Andrew Jackson, and I will take longer all comers.
Sorry Sweet Lou, no Welcher is allowed.
If anyone of you gentlemen think you can easily show me an airport surveillance video of any 9/11 hijacker, and you've got 19 chances right, going through the metal detectors at any of the airports where they hijacked planes let me know and I'll give you a week to try to find one. At the end of the week, if you can find it $20 PayPal from me to you. If you can't $20 to me. Sounds like a great deal doesn't it? I mean, surveillance videos run 24/7 and are always pointed at the metal detectors. So step right up, who wants to be the first to make some quick cash?
Well - Atta was sure cutting it close with all the bouncing around on "THE DAY". I mean come on- can this bullshit get any higher?
Supposedly he had a big argument with the Portland Airport people because he thought he would go right from one plane to the next without another security check.
Thats pulling alot of exposure for a guy who cannot get caught before his mission fom god is done! :drink:
I live about 20 miles from Logan Airport and I remember a story in the Boston papers about a fight of some kind reported by witnesses in the parking lot where Atta's car was parked. Details were sketchy if you know what I mean.
My guess is this is where Atta and his friends were picked up by the boys in black- and his car was filled with all that incriminating material. The patsys had done the job their masters wanted. Their time was up. The rest would be written for them.@)
Supposedly he had a big argument with the Portland Airport people because he thought he would go right from one plane to the next without another security check.
Thats pulling alot of exposure for a guy who cannot get caught before his mission fom god is done! :drink:
I live about 20 miles from Logan Airport and I remember a story in the Boston papers about a fight of some kind reported by witnesses in the parking lot where Atta's car was parked. Details were sketchy if you know what I mean.
My guess is this is where Atta and his friends were picked up by the boys in black- and his car was filled with all that incriminating material. The patsys had done the job their masters wanted. Their time was up. The rest would be written for them.@)
LOL...The Story is Asinine. And I believe the Commission did not realize how foolish the story actually was and this wast he reason they chose not to comment on it....They had no answer....because there is nothing you can say about that level of idiocy...
Parking a car at Logan with a Flight Manual in "plane" view...the driving back to Maine to Fly back To Logan?
Obviously that didn't happen....I agree...the patsy's probably didn't even have a chance to protect themselves....soon as the car was parked, that was it....
If anyone of you gentlemen think you can easily show me an airport surveillance video
No one but you believes this is a Video. Therefore you lose.
WELCHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You didn't state any such rules...you asked for the video and I provided it.
It's as simple as that.
You can't change the rules after the fact.
This is a gambling forum...no place for GD welchers here.
Pay up Bub ! ~~:<<
Video shows 9/11 security check
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3915471.stm
THREATS AND RESPONSES: THE PLOT; Surveillance Video Shows Hijackers in Dulles Search
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/22/u...ance-video-shows-hijackers-dulles-search.html
Hijackers at Dulles Airport
(Associated Press / July 21, 2004)
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...7162333.photogallery?index=nyc-5hijackers0721
(CNN) -- A surveillance video from Washington's Dulles International Airport the morning of September 11, 2001, shows four of five hijackers passing through security checks before boarding the plane they would crash into the Pentagon.
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/US/07/21/attacks.surveillance.video/index.html
Hijackers caught on airport CCTV
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-311158/Hijackers-caught-airport-CCTV.html
:cripwalk:
They found one of the supposed hijackers alive and well in the middle-east you can find that video on google videos too its called False Flag...every war in american history has been based on a false flag attack I could have told you this years ago I was born and raised in Hawaii and my family is native...if you dont think World War 2 and Pearl Harbor wasnt just as sketchy as 9/11 your blind to the facts....your telling me 100's of planes were flying towards hawaii and that no type of radar picked them up? We wanted them to attack so we could have a reason to go to war.....you can trace false flag attacks all the way back to World War 1 aswell with the sinking of the Lusitina(spelled wrong) but in the New york times 1 week before the ship set sail there was an ad that said do not board this ship and do so at your own risk....sure enough what happened the germans sunk it...we went to war
- Status
