Lol, the whole climate is 4.5 billion years old bit. That's very useful information when trying to understand how humans pumping billions of tons of CO2 in to the air affects the climate. Conservatives are incredibly dumb, lol.
CO2, vital for all life on this planet, currently makes up 0.04% of the atmosphere. You are scary dumb.
"Hottest on Record!" (100 years of data on a planet 4.5 billion years old)
Real climate science isn't based on short term variations or anything. face)(*^%
Your "educated community" has a non-critical thinking dolt like you believing a gas which makes up less than 0.04% of the atmosphere is creating a "green house effect" ointer:
Yea, the "educated community" definitely has no clue what they are talking about. NASA definitely is not a credible source of individuals who understand climate. Let's listen to retard conservatives that would have trouble passing a high school algebra class, lol. You are very retarded. They have understood the trapping nature of CO2 for over 150 years. That's how dumb you are, you aren't even able to grasp what people understood before there were even computers or satellites.
Yea, the "educated community" definitely has no clue what they are talking about. NASA definitely is not a credible source of individuals who understand climate. Let's listen to retard conservatives that would have trouble passing a high school algebra class, lol. You are very retarded. They have understood the trapping nature of CO2 for over 150 years. That's how dumb you are, you aren't even able to grasp what people understood before there were even computers or satellites.
The current warming trend is of particular significance because most of it is very likely human-induced and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented in the past 1,300 years.[SUP]1
[/SUP]
Earth-orbiting satellites and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types of information about our planet and its climate on a global scale. Studying these climate data collected over many years reveal the signals of a changing climate.
The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century.[SUP]2[/SUP] Their ability to affect the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere is the scientific basis of many instruments flown by NASA. There is no question that increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response.
Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that the Earth’s climate responds to changes in greenhouse gas levels. They also show that in the past, large changes in climate have happened very quickly, geologically-speaking: in tens of years, not in millions or even thousands.[SUP]3[/SUP]
Just stop already.
Every time they get into specifics trying to prove their crackpot theory (like that dumb fuck EPA dyke warning about "snow levels" in Aspen) they end up with egg on their faces.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
World's top climate scientists confess: Global warming is just QUARTER what we thought - and computers got the effects of greenhouse gases wrong
- Leaked report reveals the world has warmed at quarter the rate claimed by IPCC in 2007
- Scientists accept their computers may have exaggerated
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cts-greenhouse-gases-wrong.html#ixzz3QMHOZsyx
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AGW only exists inside corrupt, faulty computer models, nowhere else.
Cult-worshipping nutjob.
Loser!@#0
you are wasting time, you will never get these people to think. They will use dumb arguments like the Earth is 4.5 billion years old when the earth has only been industrialized for a short period. arguments such as Co2 is vital for life and cant possibly be dangerous. that would be like saying the ions in human body such as potassium and sodium are natural to the body and are not dangerous.
you are wasting time, you will never get these people to think. They will use dumb arguments like the Earth is 4.5 billion years old when the earth has only been industrialized for a short period. arguments such as Co2 is vital for life and cant possibly be dangerous. that would be like saying the ions in human body such as potassium and sodium are natural to the body and are not dangerous.
There arguments are absolutely hilarious. As uneducated as arguments can possibly be. The best part is they truly believe the shit they are saying. Absolutely no scientific reasoning behind it, just simply their thoughts, lol. Like children.
He is, he is cutting education, my nephews have had curriculum scrapped since he has taken office. He is
cutting more and now he is trying to fund for a new Bucks stadium
. Weird ass freaks like you and Ace act like you are never wrong about anything, it is hilarious. Ace can be blatantly wrong about something and still is too big of a nutter to admit it.
Um, there is a precise zero correlation between educational spending and educational achievement and outcomes.
You are really, really stupid.
Not moving the goalposts at all. Just want you to realize that the climate change argument is not based on short term variations. It's not even based on snowfall. It's based on long term trends of warming. Aspen is getting hotter, that they know for a fact. How that affects snowfall is pretty meaningless as the seasons will be shorter as Aspen gets hotter.
You just are really dumb and can't even represent the climate change argument correctly so you have to report these absolutely ridiculous logical fallacies.