United States Confirms: 2014 was Hottest Year on Record - And AK Confirms Conservatives are Retarded

Search

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,421
Tokens
Lol, the whole climate is 4.5 billion years old bit. That's very useful information when trying to understand how humans pumping billions of tons of CO2 in to the air affects the climate. Conservatives are incredibly dumb, lol.

CO2, vital for all life on this planet, currently makes up 0.04% of the atmosphere. You are scary dumb.

"Hottest on Record!" (100 years of data on a planet 4.5 billion years old)

Real climate science isn't based on short term variations or anything. face)(*^%
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
CO2, vital for all life on this planet, currently makes up 0.04% of the atmosphere. You are scary dumb.

"Hottest on Record!" (100 years of data on a planet 4.5 billion years old)

Real climate science isn't based on short term variations or anything. face)(*^%

CO2 also traps heat and no one is advocating that we need to eliminate all CO2 from the planet. Solid argument you have there, lol.

It's kind of hard to understand how humans pumping billions of tons of CO2 affects the climate by comparing climate to the billions of years humans didn't even exist, lol.

God, you are retarded.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,421
Tokens
He hasn't. He still looks like a retard to the educated community.

Your so-called "educated community" has a non-critical thinking dolt like you believing a gas which makes up less than 0.04% of the atmosphere is creating a "greenhouse effect" :pointer:
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Your "educated community" has a non-critical thinking dolt like you believing a gas which makes up less than 0.04% of the atmosphere is creating a "green house effect" :pointer:

Yea, the "educated community" definitely has no clue what they are talking about. NASA definitely is not a credible source of individuals who understand climate. Let's listen to retard conservatives that would have trouble passing a high school algebra class, lol. You are very retarded. They have understood the trapping nature of CO2 for over 150 years. That's how dumb you are, you aren't even able to grasp what people understood before there were even computers or satellites.

203_co2-graph-1280x800.jpg

The current warming trend is of particular significance because most of it is very likely human-induced and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented in the past 1,300 years.[SUP]1

[/SUP]


Earth-orbiting satellites and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types of information about our planet and its climate on a global scale. Studying these climate data collected over many years reveal the signals of a changing climate.

The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century.[SUP]2[/SUP] Their ability to affect the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere is the scientific basis of many instruments flown by NASA. There is no question that increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response.


Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that the Earth’s climate responds to changes in greenhouse gas levels. They also show that in the past, large changes in climate have happened very quickly, geologically-speaking: in tens of years, not in millions or even thousands.[SUP]3[/SUP]
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,421
Tokens
Yea, the "educated community" definitely has no clue what they are talking about. NASA definitely is not a credible source of individuals who understand climate. Let's listen to retard conservatives that would have trouble passing a high school algebra class, lol. You are very retarded. They have understood the trapping nature of CO2 for over 150 years. That's how dumb you are, you aren't even able to grasp what people understood before there were even computers or satellites.

Just stop already.

Every time they get into specifics trying to prove their crackpot theory (like that dumb fuck EPA dyke warning about "snow levels" in Aspen) they end up with egg on their faces.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

World's top climate scientists confess: Global warming is just QUARTER what we thought - and computers got the effects of greenhouse gases wrong


  • Leaked report reveals the world has warmed at quarter the rate claimed by IPCC in 2007
  • Scientists accept their computers may have exaggerated

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cts-greenhouse-gases-wrong.html#ixzz3QMHOZsyx
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AGW only exists inside corrupt, faulty computer models, nowhere else.

Cult-worshipping nutjob.

Loser!@#0
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
2,924
Tokens
Yea, the "educated community" definitely has no clue what they are talking about. NASA definitely is not a credible source of individuals who understand climate. Let's listen to retard conservatives that would have trouble passing a high school algebra class, lol. You are very retarded. They have understood the trapping nature of CO2 for over 150 years. That's how dumb you are, you aren't even able to grasp what people understood before there were even computers or satellites.

203_co2-graph-1280x800.jpg

The current warming trend is of particular significance because most of it is very likely human-induced and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented in the past 1,300 years.[SUP]1

[/SUP]


Earth-orbiting satellites and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types of information about our planet and its climate on a global scale. Studying these climate data collected over many years reveal the signals of a changing climate.

The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century.[SUP]2[/SUP] Their ability to affect the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere is the scientific basis of many instruments flown by NASA. There is no question that increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response.


Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that the Earth’s climate responds to changes in greenhouse gas levels. They also show that in the past, large changes in climate have happened very quickly, geologically-speaking: in tens of years, not in millions or even thousands.[SUP]3[/SUP]

you are wasting time, you will never get these people to think. They will use dumb arguments like the Earth is 4.5 billion years old when the earth has only been industrialized for a short period. arguments such as Co2 is vital for life and cant possibly be dangerous. that would be like saying the ions in human body such as potassium and sodium are natural to the body and are not dangerous.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,421
Tokens
Obviously the climate nutters are going to have to reach out to Martians and their massive CO2 emissions, too, or this shit ain't ever gonna get fixed!

"Earth is heating up lately, but so are Mars, Pluto and other worlds in oursolar system, leading some scientists to speculate that a change in thesun’s activity is the common thread linking all these baking events."

http://www.livescience.com/1349-sun-blamed-warming-earth-worlds.html

Maybe it's the sun's activity that causes all these temp fluctuations on MANY planets? :think1:

"greenhouse effect" :missingte
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Just stop already.

Every time they get into specifics trying to prove their crackpot theory (like that dumb fuck EPA dyke warning about "snow levels" in Aspen) they end up with egg on their faces.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

World's top climate scientists confess: Global warming is just QUARTER what we thought - and computers got the effects of greenhouse gases wrong


  • Leaked report reveals the world has warmed at quarter the rate claimed by IPCC in 2007
  • Scientists accept their computers may have exaggerated

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cts-greenhouse-gases-wrong.html#ixzz3QMHOZsyx
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AGW only exists inside corrupt, faulty computer models, nowhere else.

Cult-worshipping nutjob.

Loser!@#0

A daily mail national equirer article or NASA... very difficult decision here, lol. You are very dumb. It's pretty embarrassing.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
you are wasting time, you will never get these people to think. They will use dumb arguments like the Earth is 4.5 billion years old when the earth has only been industrialized for a short period. arguments such as Co2 is vital for life and cant possibly be dangerous. that would be like saying the ions in human body such as potassium and sodium are natural to the body and are not dangerous.

There arguments are absolutely hilarious. As uneducated as arguments can possibly be. The best part is they truly believe the shit they are saying. Absolutely no scientific reasoning behind it, just simply their thoughts, lol. Like children.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,421
Tokens
you are wasting time, you will never get these people to think. They will use dumb arguments like the Earth is 4.5 billion years old when the earth has only been industrialized for a short period. arguments such as Co2 is vital for life and cant possibly be dangerous. that would be like saying the ions in human body such as potassium and sodium are natural to the body and are not dangerous.

This coming from a guy who says a governor has made people in WI dumb or something. face)(*^%
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,421
Tokens
There arguments are absolutely hilarious. As uneducated as arguments can possibly be. The best part is they truly believe the shit they are saying. Absolutely no scientific reasoning behind it, just simply their thoughts, lol. Like children.

One again....

IDEOLOGY:

140217-kerry-climate-change.jpg


REALITY:

greenhouse_sources3.gif


May future generations understand that not EVERYONE bought into this hoax.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2009
Messages
2,924
Tokens
This coming from a guy who says a governor has made people in WI dumb or something. face)(*^%

He is, he is cutting education, my nephews have had curriculum scrapped since he has taken office. He is
cutting more and now he is trying to fund for a new Bucks stadium
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
He is, he is cutting education, my nephews have had curriculum scrapped since he has taken office. He is
cutting more and now he is trying to fund for a new Bucks stadium

Um, there is a precise zero correlation between educational spending and educational achievement and outcomes.

You are really, really stupid.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
. Weird ass freaks like you and Ace act like you are never wrong about anything, it is hilarious. Ace can be blatantly wrong about something and still is too big of a nutter to admit it.

Yeah, kind of like when you used "willfully" in such a comically dumb manner that 3 people with law degrees were mocking you and you absolutely refused to acknowledge you were wrong.

You are a laughable idiot and pathetic coward.
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
52,421
Tokens
Um, there is a precise zero correlation between educational spending and educational achievement and outcomes.

You are really, really stupid.

Democrats don't measure success by results, rather how much other people's money they spend.

This makes them incredibly enlightened and intelligent people or something.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
Not moving the goalposts at all. Just want you to realize that the climate change argument is not based on short term variations. It's not even based on snowfall. It's based on long term trends of warming. Aspen is getting hotter, that they know for a fact. How that affects snowfall is pretty meaningless as the seasons will be shorter as Aspen gets hotter.

You just are really dumb and can't even represent the climate change argument correctly so you have to report these absolutely ridiculous logical fallacies.

"long term trends"

Hmm... It's kind of sad you weren't a statistics major.

The earth has been here for billions of years. Please enlighten us on the time frame for which we have solid data, compared to the earth's history.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,902
Tokens
t's based on long term trends of warming.

:):)

There is no "long term trend" of warming.

The temperature is (allegedly) up since 1880.

You're a comical and laughable dumb fuck.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,944
Messages
13,575,430
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com