The ULTIMATE Tout/Anti-Tout Argument

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
12
Tokens
Lemme get this straight, Jake. You're selling picks, yet you can only afford to wager a double sawbuck on the games yourself?

If this is the case, two conclusions. One is that you could be lousy. The other is that even if you're the nuts, you must be horrendous with money management in order to have failed to increase your bankroll to the point where you can play more than $20 per play.

Either way, it's not exactly a ringing endorsement of your abilities.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,730
Tokens
This is a copy of a classic post that sent one tout-wanna-be down in flames. Poor Jake

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Jake Thompson:
Ok, I'll answer these the way I would look at them, with my way of capping games. Instead of going into the questions too deep, I'll do it briefly, because quite frankly I don't feel I have to prove anything and this is the Rubber Room and all.

"1) Besides runs scored, which are the two most important offensive catagories a handicapper uses to evaluate a specific baseball team?"

On Base Percentage is big (hits/walks) and Slugging Percentage. Even though I consider many more statistics for figuring out offensive production, those two are fairly telling.

"2)SF is -160 favorite at home against Neagle/Colorado. Late word out of SF says Bonds tweaked his back during batting practice and will be replaced by Marquis Grissom. How much should the line be adjusted, and explain the reasoning behind the adjustment."

The line should be adjusted depending on what percentage of the Giants offense Bonds is at the time. I can't tell you the adjustment without that.

"3) You like the under in the New York/Chicago game. One book has the under at 7.5 -130. Another out has it at 7 -105. Which line offers the best value and explain your reasoning."

Good question. As far as which line historically has more value, couldn't tell you. If I capped the game at 7 I would lay off. If I capped it at 6.5 I would take under 7. I never want to lay 130 on a total. That's how I'd look at it.

"4) Next day: you again like the under for NY/Chi. One book has the line at 8 -105; another has it at 8.5 -125. Which line offers the best value and explain your reasoning."

If I capped it at 7.5 or 8, I'd take under 8.5, if I capped it at 7, I'd take under 8. My reasoning being -125 is a little cheaper than the other -130 example I guess.

"5) The Mets are starting a pitcher just promoted from AAA in tonight's game against the Expos. What methods would you use in evaluating this rookie's chances of success in his major league debut against Montreal?"

Look at his stats in the minors. Look at what leagues he's played in. What teams/coaches. How highly he's looked upon by certain institutes that do prospectus reports. Check out how Montreal has been hitting against pitchers they've seen for the first time. Other things too, but those are a few I'd do.

Sorry I didn't answer in better detail, but I have better things to do right now.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
 

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
28,149
Tokens
Shotgun, the questions were tough and I didn't know them all? Should it matter whatsoever if I can win money (50 units last season and half of this one)?

Here's a comparison straight from Idaho for ya:
You don't have to milk the cow every day to know what milk is.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,740
Messages
13,559,056
Members
100,680
Latest member
nhacaibj88place
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com