The Sports Cruncher's 2015 CFB Week 02 Lines & Market Play

Search

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
I took UNT @ SMU Over 56 when it opened, a play I don't really like by the numbers, just anticipating the line move there. The line is at 61.5 now and starting to drop, so I'm going to buy back the half unit @ 61.5 and go for the middle.

SMU actually executed their offense at a pretty slow pace against Baylor -- more than 29 seconds per play. I thought they were supposed to up tempo with new HC Chad Morris? Anyway, I expect them to move quicker in this game, but I still think this game plays out to the mid 50s. It's North Texas, after all, one of the absolute worst offenses in FBS last year (though their defense wasn't much better, to be honest).
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
90,998
Tokens
I remember that coffee cup from last season...LOL.

Good luck cruncher!
 

New member
Joined
Sep 8, 2015
Messages
31
Tokens
With you on Florida and LSU... Think you could give some in-depth discussion on those two and your reasoning behind the picks?
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
With you on Florida and LSU... Think you could give some in-depth discussion on those two and your reasoning behind the picks?

I don't like either one at current prices, actually. It's probable that I'm over estimating MSST at this point when I project a very close game. I seem to be in a real minority there and they didn't play great last week. Florida I liked for sure at -14 but anything near -20 is just too high. ECU was pretty bad last week though, so it could get really ugly still.
 

DC.

New member
Joined
Oct 24, 2013
Messages
1,623
Tokens
Good luck cruncher...always good to read your analysis
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Thx GB and DC - always like seeing the regs drop by. :)

ADDING FOR 1/2 UNIT: ORE @ MSST OVER 64.5 (-110 5D)

64.5 Is definitely a number I can work with.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
833
Tokens
Hey crunch, always appreciate your work. Any insight to the Ltech play tonight? The line moved in your favor. Thanks in advance. GL this year
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Hey crunch, always appreciate your work. Any insight to the Ltech play tonight? The line moved in your favor. Thanks in advance. GL this year

Thanks, Blue. A week #2 game is still going to be based primarily on last year's stats. Last year LT dominated WKU, outgaining them 507 to 297 yards en route to a 59-10 final score. LT shut down WKU's passing game like nobody else was able to do last year -- not even Marshall, who had a higher passer defense rating that LT. How many times will you see a team beat a team by 49 points and them open up as a dog against them the following year? Wouldn't surprise me if this was the first time ever, lol. Even after adjusting for graduation and returning personnel I don't think home field is worth 40 points. :think2: As for this year, WKU got off to a slow start against Vandy and was lucky to win. Their offense finally got something going in the 2nd half - not a lot, but enough to beat Vandy who squandered numerous scoring opportunities and fell a foot and half short from tying the game at the end. LT ranked much higher than VAN in defense last year, though LT has less returning defensive starters and % of tackles than VAN this year. LT cruised to an easy win against Southern last week. LT now has former Florida Gator Jeff Driskel at QB, and he was efficient going 12-15, 274 yards and 4 touchdowns. Whoa, that's wayyyy more than efficient, even if it's a small sample size against an FCS school. WKU couldn't run it against Vandy last week, and surrendered more yards per run and pass than VAN usually gained last year.

Final Score Prediction -- LT 33 - WKU 27
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Adding for 1/2 Unit: ARMY @ UCONN Over 46

Was hoping for 45, but it didn't quite get there, and is now moving back up. This is in interesting game for my spreadsheet, as the addition of a new variable to my O/U line making is the main reason I like the Over here. Last year these two played to the mid 50s, as did every Army game, on average. UConn's average game came in at just under 50 last year, but that's because UConn couldn't score -- they still gave up over 30 points per game. Army won't be stopping anyone this year really. They couldn't stop Fordham last week and lost. Army fields a lot of new players this year, my only fear for the Over is that Army's offense is more affected by it then I project this year.
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Adding for 1/2 Unit: BUFF @ PSU Under 52.5

A warning up front -- this play goes against the market which has taken the opening 49 up over the key # 52. Why? I can hazard some guesses, and they all have to do with Buffalo. The Bulls were not a good defense last year, particularly on the road. They have high turnover defensively coming into this year. IMO they weren't as bad as some think, though they were the worst at giving up big plays (which isn't exactly a PSU specialty, I'm thinking). Secondly, Buffalo returns a lot of their offense, including a good QB in Joe Licata. This game will be an FBS baptism by fire for new HC Leipold who jumped all the way up from Wis-Whitewater in the DIII ranks.

Sure Temple has a pretty good defense, but PSU didn't even come close to applying scoring pressure after the first quarter last week. BUFF coach Leipold got his job because WW won with defense -- they were ranked #1 in their division last year. It's a bit optimistic to think that that will translate to instant on-field success, but all we need is BUFF to at least be similar in strength as to what they were last year (on both sides of the ball), and the same goes for PSU -- which they certainly showed last week. Like Arizona, PSU's defense suffered when they lost a top linebacker to injury, and they actually lost two. Wooten is now probable, and Bell is "?".

PSU is a team not built for 4th quarter scoring, for either themselves or their opponents. I'm going to bank on that even against a less predictable MAC team here.
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Adding for 1/2 Unit: SYR -3.5 vs WAKE

It's a funny thing when fading Wake Forest is the contrarian play.
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Thx, Vark!

Adding for 1/2 Unit Each: EMU +14 @ Wyoming & Over 52

EMU was outplaying Old Dominion as a home dog last week until QB Reginald Bell III took a shot to the chops and was knocked from the game. His replacement couldn't close with the lead and EMU's woes continued into a new season. QB Bell is still listed as "?". I'm comfortable with the plays if he ends up missing, and think them even more valuable if he plays (and plays up to his abilities). The Old Dominion team of last year was definitely an over type team. Their passing game with a new QB was a definite step down from last year's production against EMU, but the running game made up for it. I think the lesson there is that EMU's defense is as soft as a herd (pack, flock, kill?) of emus up front, but that they might have some players in the secondary.

Wyoming didn't look very strong up front in their opening loss to FCS North Dakota last week. They allowed ND's top rusher to go 24 for 148 with a long of 52. EMU's top rusher went 19 for 117 with a long of 32 last week. On the flip side, Wyoming was mostly passing the ball trailing, as their run game never got off the ground at any point, going just 19 for 29 yards (with 3 sacks of their QB for 17 yards hurting those numbers). That's bad, that's getting dominated up front by an FCS school. Granted, ND did have the 2nd best FCS run defense last year, but they were just 41st overall in total defense. In the passing game, WYO completed just a hair over 50% of it's passes, and the yards per pass average would be pretty anemic if not for a 92 yard score which brought them up to near average. Wyoming's offense was dictated to by an FCS school, I can't help but keep bringing that up, lol.

For this game, I'd imagine Wyoming will come out angry at home after a week of abuse for their last game. The run game will find it much easier to get going which means new QB Coffman shouldn't be under constant pressure again. EMU, with or without QB Bell, should just enough success on the ground to also take some pressure off their QB. Wyoming's run defense was downright horrible in the final 3/4 of the season last year, and is not off to a promising start. If Bell plays I like EMU to keep it really close, and without him I think they still cover. Wyoming, with a game under it's belt versus a decent defense, will hopefully regain some of the form that saw them exploit the weaker defenses they played last year. With two near bottom ten defenses I like this one to go Over a lower than average total, but that comes with a buyer beware warning that the market really, really thinks Bell is EMU's only solution at offense, as the early $ came in strong on both WYO and the Under in spite of WYO's performance last week.

Wyoming has become one of the worst recruiting schools in the FBS (have you been to mid-eastern Wyoming? Not a shocker, lol). On last year's stats alone Wyoming doesn't have much of an advantage in this game, and I don't think the first week's games show anything to shake those numbers up too much. I'm hoping Saturday in Laramie doesn't turn into Hell without Bell.
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Final update of lines and values for week #2. 2-1 on the early sides so far, but only bet one of them...can you guess which one? lol.

Median gain of a 1/2 point against the market on all sides and totals.

aNUnW9v.png

wugPM0x.png
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
If you're gonna drop a line begging, I just can't say no to...

Adding for 1/2 Unit: KSU -14 @ UTSA

Bad news, looks like EMU QB Bell is expected to miss.
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Adding for 1/2 Unit: BGSU +0.5 @ MD 2nd half

Bowling Green passing game working in spite of only 6 points scored. Start 2nd half with the ball.
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Adding for 1/2 Unit: CONN -3 2nd half vs Army.

UConn passing the ball nicely, expecting them to widen the gap at home 2nd half.
 

Chomping at the bits
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,118
Tokens
Good start on the morning games going 8-3-1 with a whiff on one middle.

Adding for 1/2 Unit: UVA +7 2nd half vs ND

ND can't find any passing rhythm, but running the ball very well. It's the opposite for UVA.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,883
Messages
13,574,660
Members
100,881
Latest member
afinaahly
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com