Oh no you didn't!
Experts who rate such stuff say he was the greatest going out to short right for balls.
Won Rookie of the Year.
Won an MVP.
Was a ten time All Star.
Hall of Famer
Won *seven* consecutive silver sluggers awards while winning *seven* consecutive gold gloves (total of nine for his career)
So that would make him the best defensive second baseman while being the most productive offensive second baseman of his generation.
Hit .385 in ten postseason games.
Not his fault his teams basicly sucked.
Oh, did I mention he is my all time favorite player.
Tom Brady.... system QB with a great defense when he won the three Super Bowls.... isn't it funny in 2007 the Patriots had the best offense and went 16-0. But Brady set his records against teams in his division that went 7-9 (Bills), 4-12 (Jets), and 1-15 (Dolphins) and fouled to win the Super Bowl. People always say Brady is better then Manning.... If you give Manning the defenses that Brady has had over his career Manning has 3 if not more Super Bowls. Its no secret the year the Colts won the Super Bowl they had a better defense then the Patriots. Defense is the reason the Patriots won the Super Bowls that they won. I am not taking nothing away from those Patriot teams as a whole because they were great. But Tom Brady does not deserve to be called one of the best of all time.
You mention Rating which as we can see Elway wasnt the greatest at ... However you fail to mention WINS which is the single most important stat in the NFL and during the time you mention above - Elways record was 82-59-1 ...62.6 winning % which translates to a 10-6 season. Im not the biggest fan of Johns either, but to call him overated ... All this guy did was do whatever it took to win games ... Lets not forget his 33 career rushing TDS and 4.4 yd average ... and the 6th most yds rushing by a QB in NFL history. He had the Arm , the Legs and the Will to win ... thats overated. LMAO. I dont think so. Go back to the Almanac Hines and get back to us.
Reggie Bush
No Pro-Bowls, he's a 3rd down back. Would be 2nd or 3rd round pick if drafted today not 2nd overall pick who was supposed to go 1st. This fool has commercials, magazine covers, etc... and hasn't done shit
Was supposed to be the next Gale Sayers, Barry Sanders, Marshall Faulk, LT, etc... Hes not even Darren Sproles
No Pro-Bowls, he's a 3rd down back. Would be 2nd or 3rd round pick if drafted today not 2nd overall pick who was supposed to go 1st. This fool has commercials, magazine covers, etc... and hasn't done shit
Was supposed to be the next Gale Sayers, Barry Sanders, Marshall Faulk, LT, etc... Hes not even Darren Sproles
Agreed , this guy is a gloried punt returner ... Dont get me started on his RB credentials , he sux. Saints should go with Pierre Thomas fulltime if they want to win...
As for Overated , How bout
David Beckham , mofo signed a 1/4 Billion dollar contract and plays maybe half the season , IF that ...
The argument that give Manning the defense that Brady had and he would have won a super bowl is bogus. I can say, take the defense away from the Patriots and give Brady the receivers that Manning had and he could of won a ring. St. Louis won a ring because on offense (Warner, Faulk, Holt, Bruce), Manning didn't do it early on with Harrison, James, Wayne, etc.
Don't forget, Brady was throwing to Troy Brown, David Patten, Bethel Johnson, JJ Stokes, David Givens and Deon Branch...
Perhaps Brady makes people look better. He got Belicheck a reputation as a genius, ask Cleveland and Jet fans their thoughts on him before... He got Givens and Branch big deals in Tennessee and Seattle and Givens was a bust, Branch was good not great.. Moss is a stud but with Brady he is a record setter.Oh yeh when Brady when won his first two rings his running back was Antowain Smith.
What about the clutch factor? Say what you want but that Rams drive was special and he made come backs seem inevitable.
blaming the Giants loss on him is a bit unfair considering that you say he won his rings because of the Patriots defense, but they lost because of Brady. Rediculous!!
Asante Samual got burned one too many times, Rodney Harrison couldn't pry ball loose from the helmet of Tyree. Referee was 1 second from blowing whistle on Eli being down and Plaxico beat Hobbs for a touchdown for the WIN after Brady hit moss for the go ahead touchdown, where Brady came through again..
Also do not forget, yeh:
Cassell led pats to 11-5 but he couldn't lead him to playoffs. He had 5 games in which he threw 3 or more touchdowns, but 6 games when he threw zero and 5 more in which he threw only 1.
Knocking Brady is the easy thing to do because everyone loves to hate the best but it simply is not a valid argument, like him or hate him, he is among the games greatest QBs. Is he better than Peyton Manning? Now thats debateable but if I was building a team for 1 game, If i had 1st pick I take Brady, if I have 2nd, I will not be mad taking Manning, these two are so far ahead of anyone else in the league its not funny.
Don't forget, Brady was throwing to Troy Brown, David Patten, Bethel Johnson, JJ Stokes, David Givens and Deon Branch...
Perhaps Brady makes people look better. He got Belicheck a reputation as a genius, ask Cleveland and Jet fans their thoughts on him before... He got Givens and Branch big deals in Tennessee and Seattle and Givens was a bust, Branch was good not great.. Moss is a stud but with Brady he is a record setter.Oh yeh when Brady when won his first two rings his running back was Antowain Smith.
What about the clutch factor? Say what you want but that Rams drive was special and he made come backs seem inevitable.
blaming the Giants loss on him is a bit unfair considering that you say he won his rings because of the Patriots defense, but they lost because of Brady. Rediculous!!
Asante Samual got burned one too many times, Rodney Harrison couldn't pry ball loose from the helmet of Tyree. Referee was 1 second from blowing whistle on Eli being down and Plaxico beat Hobbs for a touchdown for the WIN after Brady hit moss for the go ahead touchdown, where Brady came through again..
Also do not forget, yeh:
Cassell led pats to 11-5 but he couldn't lead him to playoffs. He had 5 games in which he threw 3 or more touchdowns, but 6 games when he threw zero and 5 more in which he threw only 1.
Knocking Brady is the easy thing to do because everyone loves to hate the best but it simply is not a valid argument, like him or hate him, he is among the games greatest QBs. Is he better than Peyton Manning? Now thats debateable but if I was building a team for 1 game, If i had 1st pick I take Brady, if I have 2nd, I will not be mad taking Manning, these two are so far ahead of anyone else in the league its not funny.
It's Derek Jeter, by far and this isn't even a contest. He's hits for average and that's all he's ever done. Statistically he's a sub-par fielder, he doesn't hit for power and is only glorified because of the great teams he has been on.
Oh, and by the way, he's not Mr. Clutch, or Mr. October/November, his stats in those months and the postseason are satisfactory at best. If he played on the Rockies, or Padres his whole career you would never even have known his name.
Oh, and by the way, he's not Mr. Clutch, or Mr. October/November, his stats in those months and the postseason are satisfactory at best. If he played on the Rockies, or Padres his whole career you would never even have known his name.
Did Brady win a Super Bowl the year he had the best offense and best wide receiver crew (Moss, Stallworth, and Welker) in the NFL? No. Its all about the system. Brady had the best receivers in the league and couldn't win. I am not saying Brady is a bad QB I am saying he is overrated thats all.
