- Status
Good Luck to All! The Fade is Purdue but I'm Betting With the Langster Here. Lock and Loaded Baby, Dukies -8 1/2
Okie dokie dedmoney!
The Betting Lang Fund:
Starting 3/22/2010 with $1,000, betting 1% of the bankroll = 1 dime then add the vig. A maximum 1/3 of bankroll bet at any one time which is 30 dimes plus the vig and a minimum of 10 dimes plus the vig bet at any one time.
1. 3/22/2010 Northern Colorado Bears -1 over the Pacific Tigers, Bet $110 ($1,000/100 * 10 (10 dimes minimum) * 11/10) Lost $110, Bankroll now $890
2. 3/23/2010 Indiana Pacers +4 over the Detroit Pistons Bet $97.90 ($890/100 * 10 (10 dimes minimum) * 11/10), Win $89, Bankroll now $979
3. 3/24/2010 Bet $107.69 on the Indiana Pacers -9 at home over the Washington Wizards ($979/100 * 10 (10 dimes minimum) * 11/10), Win $97.90, Bankroll now $1,076.90
4. 3/25/2010 Bet $177.68 on the Kansas State Wildcats -4 1/2 over the Xavier Musketeers ($1,076.90/100 * 15 * 11/10), Win $161.53, Bankroll now $1,238.43
5. 3/26/2010 Bet $136.22 on the Duke Blue Devils -8 1/2 over the Purdue Boiler Makers ($1,238.43/100 *10 * 11/10)
:toast:
Okie dokie dedmoney!
The Betting Lang Fund:
Starting 3/22/2010 with $1,000, betting 1% of the bankroll = 1 dime then add the vig. A maximum 1/3 of bankroll bet at any one time which is 30 dimes plus the vig and a minimum of 10 dimes plus the vig bet at any one time.
1. 3/22/2010 Northern Colorado Bears -1 over the Pacific Tigers, Bet $110 ($1,000/100 * 10 (10 dimes minimum) * 11/10) Lost $110, Bankroll now $890
2. 3/23/2010 Indiana Pacers +4 over the Detroit Pistons Bet $97.90 ($890/100 * 10 (10 dimes minimum) * 11/10), Win $89, Bankroll now $979
3. 3/24/2010 Bet $107.69 on the Indiana Pacers -9 at home over the Washington Wizards ($979/100 * 10 (10 dimes minimum) * 11/10), Win $97.90, Bankroll now $1,076.90
4. 3/25/2010 Bet $177.68 on the Kansas State Wildcats -4 1/2 over the Xavier Musketeers ($1,076.90/100 * 15 * 11/10), Win $161.53, Bankroll now $1,238.43
5. 3/26/2010 Bet $136.22 on the Duke Blue Devils -8 1/2 over the Purdue Boiler Makers ($1,238.43/100 *10 * 11/10)
:toast:
Surprise! Surprise! Surprise! Mr. DeMarco Has a Bet!
From the GM's blog, not his official writeup:
Top-seeded Duke, meeting No. 4 seed Purdue, is on ATS plunges of 2-10 in the Dance and 2-11 as a Tournament chalk, though it has also gone 5-2 ATS in its last seven starts against the Big Ten and 6-2 ATS in its last eight Friday games.
The Boilermakers are a mixed bag at the betting window, with ATS upticks of 4-1 catching points, 8-3 as a neutral-site pup and 7-3 as a Tourney dog, countered by negative ATS streaks of 2-6-1 overall, 2-5 against ACC foes, 1-5 after a SU win and 6-13-1 after a spread-cover.
Purdue is on “under” stretches of 6-2 overall and 6-0 against the ACC, and Duke is on “under” tears of 5-1 overall (all as a chalk), 18-6 on neutral floors, 8-3 in the Tournament and 12-4 as a Tourney favorite.
Biggest College Release
of the Entire Season
15 Dime
Sweet 16
Game of the Year
Duke - Purdue
Same 15 dime release that I'm 26-8-2 with in the NFL
over the past two seasons!
From the GM's blog, not his official writeup:
Top-seeded Duke, meeting No. 4 seed Purdue, is on ATS plunges of 2-10 in the Dance and 2-11 as a Tournament chalk, though it has also gone 5-2 ATS in its last seven starts against the Big Ten and 6-2 ATS in its last eight Friday games.
The Boilermakers are a mixed bag at the betting window, with ATS upticks of 4-1 catching points, 8-3 as a neutral-site pup and 7-3 as a Tourney dog, countered by negative ATS streaks of 2-6-1 overall, 2-5 against ACC foes, 1-5 after a SU win and 6-13-1 after a spread-cover.
Purdue is on “under” stretches of 6-2 overall and 6-0 against the ACC, and Duke is on “under” tears of 5-1 overall (all as a chalk), 18-6 on neutral floors, 8-3 in the Tournament and 12-4 as a Tourney favorite.
Confirmation Requested, Did You Buy Lang's Pick?
Lang's 10 dime pick on Duke was taken from a sports forum thread, we believe it probably is right to a 99% degree of certainty. Picks are copied from one thread to another. The only way to confirm this pick 100% is if you have bought today's pick. If you have purchased today's pick from Lang please confirm to us if this is correct. Thanks.
:toast:
Lang's 10 dime pick on Duke was taken from a sports forum thread, we believe it probably is right to a 99% degree of certainty. Picks are copied from one thread to another. The only way to confirm this pick 100% is if you have bought today's pick. If you have purchased today's pick from Lang please confirm to us if this is correct. Thanks.
:toast:
Hope this helps
I originally saw that pick at Fantasy Bets Zone. The pick is over here at the Rx Service Plays Forum, Service Plays Friday 3/26/10 <!-- login form --> <script type="text/javascript" src="clientscript/vbulletin_md5.js?v=373"></script>
http://therxforum.com/showpost.php?p=7747481&postcount=33
Lang
10 Dimer Winner # 3 in a Row
Duke
<!-- / message -->
These picks are picked up immediately by posters who post them from one forum to another. The only way you can be 100% correct that this is the right pick is if you buy it directly from Lang. We had two people that did that, but they posted Lang's writeups here with 3 character codes in the writeups to identify who was posting online. Their accounts were subsequently canceled so we now do not have 100% confirmation. I have never seen a bad pick posted for Lang in the service plays forums, but it is possible! But by now someone would of told us if the above pick was incorrect.
I would not post intentionally the wrong Lang play in this forum. God forbid, imagine if you had Kansas State -4 1/2 yesterday!
:toast:
I originally saw that pick at Fantasy Bets Zone. The pick is over here at the Rx Service Plays Forum, Service Plays Friday 3/26/10 <!-- login form --> <script type="text/javascript" src="clientscript/vbulletin_md5.js?v=373"></script>
http://therxforum.com/showpost.php?p=7747481&postcount=33
Lang
10 Dimer Winner # 3 in a Row
Duke
<!-- / message -->
These picks are picked up immediately by posters who post them from one forum to another. The only way you can be 100% correct that this is the right pick is if you buy it directly from Lang. We had two people that did that, but they posted Lang's writeups here with 3 character codes in the writeups to identify who was posting online. Their accounts were subsequently canceled so we now do not have 100% confirmation. I have never seen a bad pick posted for Lang in the service plays forums, but it is possible! But by now someone would of told us if the above pick was incorrect.
I would not post intentionally the wrong Lang play in this forum. God forbid, imagine if you had Kansas State -4 1/2 yesterday!
:toast:
Press this button to be 100% sure of today's pick, credit card required.
To get 100% confirmation, please get your credit card and press this button
<table id="CurrComponent__ctl0_Repeater1__ctl6__ctl0_PackageRepeater__ctl6_PackageViewer_ShowHide" class="PackageTable" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="PackageParamRow"><td valign="top" width="26%" align="right">
</td> <td valign="top" width="14%" align="right">
</td></tr></tbody></table>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/isumZjs3dKA&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/isumZjs3dKA&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
:toast:
<table id="CurrComponent__ctl0_Repeater1__ctl6__ctl0_PackageRepeater__ctl6_PackageViewer_ShowHide" class="PackageTable" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="PackageParamRow"><td valign="top" width="26%" align="right">
</td><td valign="top" width="14%" align="right">
</td></tr></tbody></table>
To get 100% confirmation, please get your credit card and press this button
<table id="CurrComponent__ctl0_Repeater1__ctl6__ctl0_PackageRepeater__ctl6_PackageViewer_ShowHide" class="PackageTable" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="PackageParamRow"><td valign="top" width="26%" align="right">
</td> <td valign="top" width="14%" align="right"> </td></tr></tbody></table>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/isumZjs3dKA&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/isumZjs3dKA&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
:toast:
<table id="CurrComponent__ctl0_Repeater1__ctl6__ctl0_PackageRepeater__ctl6_PackageViewer_ShowHide" class="PackageTable" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="PackageParamRow"><td valign="top" width="26%" align="right">
</td><td valign="top" width="14%" align="right">
</td></tr></tbody></table>
My basically "Fade Al DeMarco Idiots" System has a 3 unit play on St Mary's, 2 unit play on Purdue, and 1 unit play on Michigan State.
I discussed it yesterday and it's in the College Hoops Forum. It's sort of like fading Lang and Joe Public but with more of a sample size and if Lang is on the other side you actually bet with him, though that hasn't happened in the week I've tried it.
It went 1-0-1 last night with the push being Kansas State-Xavier at 5. It's 6-1-1 personally for me.
I discussed it yesterday and it's in the College Hoops Forum. It's sort of like fading Lang and Joe Public but with more of a sample size and if Lang is on the other side you actually bet with him, though that hasn't happened in the week I've tried it.
It went 1-0-1 last night with the push being Kansas State-Xavier at 5. It's 6-1-1 personally for me.
Totally agree !
When i said earlier, you guys were fucking up this thread.
That certainly included you, "Pepperrick"
You say that we should be kinder, then quit boomin us with all the fucking bullshit videos, stupid rumers and your constant bickering with everyone.
You don't even belong here.
You bet with lang.
It really sucks to have to weed through all your bullshit posts to get to the plays.
I'm trying to make money.
It just seems like this is just enterment for you.
Like a n only child that didn't get enough attention.
GO TO ANOTHER THREAD !!!
Please MODs, send him to the rail.
- Status
