"Yeah thats correct.
NBA tomorrow
Reverse bet on Chicago [A] against Miami.
Miami covered on the [A] was a V3 bet.
Reverse system is not an actual JM system so play at your own risk"
"Yeah you wouldn't want to chase the different home teams after it covered the first game because virtually the % of the home team covering is 1/3 less.
Basically, the system was designed on the basis that the road team has to at least cover ONCE on a 3 game road trip.
And the reverse system is to counter that
Meaning the team on the 3 game road trip has to at least NOT COVER ONCE.
So ONCE the team already covers away or home. It is better off not to play them again.
IMHO you should not follow this system blindly, choose your spots. for example, sacramento @ Nets on wednesday... their next 2 away games are against boston and cleveland. Therefore, I played Nets @ 4.5 today (thinking if anything i would chase with boston and cle; fortunately they won. Im choosing not to follow sacramento anymore because they have nothing to play for, while boston and cleveland are rolling right now with boston playing for position.
You can take your chances but I rather not. Plenty of other games to play. GLTA "
SHERM! & TEO!: thanx for clarifying! So the fact that nj "pushed" on mon., also qualified for the rev. series i'm assuming.
yeh, ive never considered when reversing before, whether or not the home team also covered in the 1st game. I'll have to experiment w/the middleing both tms. on the A bet theory, also.
bost./cleve. rev. chase looks inviting, beings i didn't play sac. (A).
haven't played the miami rev. yet, & i see mil. is a rev. B today. Think i'll just stick w/ the miami (A) win, & move on.
hno:
