I'll give you props on the Indians call, but the Pirates, I'm not sure on that one. They've been amassing some sick talent via the draft the last couple years coupled with picking up Martin and Liriano off of FA. They've underperformed like crazy the past couple years, it was just a matter of time until they got some variance to swing their way. They're just too well run to continually scuffle. Liriano's breakout year was well, I'm not going to say 'easy' to see coming simply b/c pitchers are so unpredictable but shoot, they've got AJ Burnett on their roster! We've already seen the story once lol!! He went from being a dumpster fire to a borderline ace and you couple that spacious ballpark w/ Pittsburgh's sick, sickkkkk OF (might be the best defensive OF in baseball) and you could see Liriano being a viable comeback story.
As for the bolded statement above. Man, I just don't know. If I read your picks, it would be really difficult to tail you. It's almost ironic what my reasoning would be, it's because you buy so many points. Let me explain, I see a guy buying points and I think to myself, 'Why is he buying so many points, is he lacking confidence in his picks'? If you're going to tail someone you want them oozing with confidence (something I know you're not short of lol) but you send the absolute opposite message with your 'play it safe approach'. Plus, if I were betting bigger amounts, boy, I'm not sure if I would even be up money this year tailing you. The reason simply being the huge chunks my bankroll would take when some of your -150+ wagers lose (hey, it happens lol).
I was wondering if you could do me a favor and it's going to be a slight pain in the ass for you. But, it's a Tuesday and a slow sports day (I don't think you dabble in the NBA at all, if you do, well...kickoff isn't until tomorrow lol only 3 games tonight). Could you go through your NFL wagers this season to date and adjust them for what a person who bets $100 and $200 would be up this season if they followed you on every single pick? I'll leave props out of this because you bet a pretty wide spread on them and it would be difficult to find a common unit. I believe you've mentioned your base unit as $20 (please correct me if I'm wrong). So, for example if you were betting say $30 to win $20 (-150), you would adjust my wager to $150 to win $100 or $300 to win $200 and so on? I'm asking you to do this for two reasons. One, to show you what would happen if/when you get a bigger bankroll and the swings that will result. Two, to show you that why simply betting more is a really tough sell as your justification for your heavy juice approach. I will say, it was nice to see you dabble in a ML underdog last week as that is where the real money lies (for someone who bets as much baseball as you, you should already know that). Normally, I would do this myself but frankly, I'm too goddamn busy @ work and my new company has blocked therx.
Stay golden Ponyboy
If I get the chance, I'd definitely be interested in doing something like that as a case-study for what I'd be up if my bets were consistently in the $100 range. That's an excellent idea, but I, too, have work all day so I cannot do that at the moment.
The only thing I can mention is that, again, I remind everyone every single week that *you do not have to buy the half-point or point(s) that I do* (Look through the thread, I believe I said it twice attached to my picks lol), and you'd have the same record, except for two games, as me anyway. I post that, I guess you can call it a disclaimer, every single week, so if you listen to the disclaimer and take my games with the regular -110 line, you're up a lot this year, and I would hope that people listen to it, since I do remind everyone every single week. And I will continue to do that, as I guess maybe some don't see that disclaimer in all my weekly threads
And agree about the Pirates. I thought it was easy to see, but apparently, the overrated ones in Vegas had no clue it was coming (Even when the Pirates were great in the first half, their NL Pennant Futures Odds were +950! +950 for a contender at the all-star break! I jumped on it and wisely hedged in their first rd matchup with St. Louis), as they pegged Pittsburgh for like 75 wins this year (And in fourth place, only barely ahead of the lowly Cubs, whom they predicted for 72). Man I love Win Totals.
P.S. I do NBA Over/Unders as well, but I keep that to myself, as in I don't post 'em anywhere. Had the chance to do it for Vegas Insider actually, but politely declined because I'd rather not go through that pressure and ups & downs that I did for baseball for another six months. Money isn't everything, especially when a job like that is very stressful. So I'm just going to relax this baseball offseason, enjoy my NBA betting in a pressure-less, relaxed environment, and that's it. By the way, I LOVE Wolves Over 40.5 Wins and Raptors Over 35.5 Wins. Highly, highly, highly, highly recommended. I master Win Totals every year and those are two huge ones. That recommendation goes out to everyone. Trust me. Look what I've done with my baseball and football ones that I've posted here, as an example (2-0 with my posted Indians and Rockies Overs this year; 2-0 with my NFL ones last year; and on pace to go 5-0 in NFL this year... I own Win Totals, pretty much)
*And I'm thinking about your Mariners Win Total for next year with that studded rotation. Very curious to see when it is revealed.