Teams no longer in Super Bowl contention for 2003

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
4,506
Tokens
I think that ranking is skewed from their opponents mostly passing because their behind. They do have the top rushing defense.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,824
Tokens
Hey ALmighty Fathead, Fatbob...Did you check my previous post??? Gave your lOSER ASS two winners with Green Bay bitch-slapping the Denver pussies and Tenn spanking Grudens clowns. Thought your LOSER ASS could enjoy a few winners. God knows you know nothing about winning....

Big Lou thanks for the heads up on Tennessee as you already know I have futures on them winning the AFC and the Super Bowl... Hopefully you'll be right and I'll collect the BIG BILL$$$$...

Yours in Winners---(Winning, something FatBob knows absolutely NOTHING ABOUT LOL)
Bernie
 

New member
Joined
Jun 21, 2001
Messages
1,633
Tokens
Start your own Fat Bob thread if you're going to mention him every time you post something. Thank you.

Big Lou
 

New member
Joined
Jun 21, 2001
Messages
1,633
Tokens
Check out my NFL Playoff information thread and look at the section about running backs that gained 1,850 yards or more during the regular season. I'll bump it up for you.

Big Lou
 

RPM

OG
Joined
Mar 20, 2001
Messages
23,146
Tokens
lou,

i saw that one. its very interesting and a good point.


but what about defenses? has a team WITHOUT a top ten defense won the superbowl anytime lately?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,250
Tokens
I still say you can't predict the future by applying a filtering system to past events in order to determine an outcome in the future, whether it's the stock market or sports.

If you had used a filter that eliminates 0-2 teams from winning the super bowl, that would have worked fine up until 1993, when the Cowboys started 0-2 then won it all.

The make-up of the next 35 super bowl winners will be different from the last 35.

Why is 1,850 yards the cutoff? Is Lou saying that a team with a rusher who gains 1850 or more yards can't win it? Didn't the Broncos win in when T Davis had 2,008?
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
740
Tokens
titans dust off neil o'donnell who hasn't thrown
a pass since september 2001... and looked 20 lbs
overweight to boot... 33 points in a blowout win
over the bucs. they just keep chuggin' maybe
all the way to their old hometown houston for
the big one sb xxxviii...

bol big lou.

edited to correct opposition thanx k.

[This message was edited by jimmy the greek on December 29, 2003 at 06:57 PM.]
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,530
Tokens
Big Lou - I hope you are right. I can't figure out why people are giving you sh!t about posting your SuperBowl winner. I guess some people have such a boring life that they have to bash others.

Anyway, GL on your SuperBowl pick.
1036316054.gif


KMAN
 

New member
Joined
Jun 21, 2001
Messages
1,633
Tokens
I don't follow overall rankings of team defenses. The defensive ranking that has held up through playoff history is defensive yards per rush.

Since the first Super Bowl only four teams that allowed 4.6 ypr or more during the regular season have made it to the conference finals ('69 Browns, '74 Raiders, '84 Dolphins & '97 Broncos) with Miami & Denver reaching the Super Bowl and the Broncos the only team to win it all.

Another thing to look for are teams whose defense has been giving up big runs during the playoffs even though they are winning. The 2001 Rams were a perfect exmaple of this. Although they allowed 3.8 ypr during the regular season they were giving up 5.2 ypr in their wins over Green Bay and Philadelphia in the playoffs. So it was no surprise when New England averaged 5.3 ypr against them in the Super Bowl and upset the heavily favored Rams.

Big Lou

[This message was edited by Big Lou on December 29, 2003 at 09:39 PM.]
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
2,491
Tokens
So where's the criteria on picking the titans as promised??? WELL??? yeah, that's what I thought.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 21, 2001
Messages
1,633
Tokens
More information will come out as the playoffs progress. (Hear that Sammy the Rage)?

Big Lou
 

RPM

OG
Joined
Mar 20, 2001
Messages
23,146
Tokens
i have to tell you though, i still have doubts whether a team that relies on the passing game, and a defense that isnt in the top 10 can win the superbowl.
 

New member
Joined
Jun 21, 2001
Messages
1,633
Tokens
Why not comment on some of the things I have posted so far? Share some of your wisdom with the rest of us.

Big Lou
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
129
Tokens
RPM........I dont think you can say that Tenn doesnt have a top ten defense.....Sure they may not be statistically ranked in the top ten but when you lead the league in rush defense as the titans do, then naturally you are going to give up more passing yardage do to the fact teams give up on the run because they cant and teams being behind and having to pass.

By the way Lou......are you playing Tenn in a futures(around 10-1) or is it a better payoff to play game to game?????
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
2,491
Tokens
BIG LOU, you're the one WHO "promised" to tell all after the regular season; now you are reneging. My past comments stand, unless you post your "system" play as promised before the playoffs.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
79
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Big Lou:
More information will come out as the playoffs progress. (Hear that Sammy the Rage)?

Big Lou<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

You said you would post the criteria AFTER week 17.

It's after week 17.

Lay it on us!
 

New member
Joined
Jun 21, 2001
Messages
1,633
Tokens
This is my final reply to you because you are either too lazy or too ignorant to check the facts. Nowhere did I say I was going to post the entire list of criteria used in selecting the Super Bowl winner. Here is my post from the fourth page of this thread.

"When I was posting plays during the regular season I would always do a write-up to show people why I was wagering on a particular team. I do the same for any selections I make for the Wild Card, Divisional Round or Conference Finals as well. But when it comes to the Super Bowl, I do not release the information I use for one simple reason. I have spent decades gathering information and researching history and feel I have one of the most comprehensive Super Bowl databases around. I'm not going to just give that info away. I have posted my Super Bowl pick two years running and they have both hit but I did not give any information as to why I was on them."

I am going to talk about it to some degree but as I stated above all the information used for this is not going to be posted. I want people to do their own research, as I did.

You have made your point that you do not believe in this. Any further posts from you will not be responded to. Good luck to you.

Big Lou
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,989
Messages
13,575,877
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com