so they finally admitted the moon landing was fake?

Search

New member
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
5,666
Tokens
O and A this morning were talking about Whoopi's latest delusional conspricy rant about how she thinks the moon landing was stages.
The boys kill her every chance they get.

Is that where she brilliantly asked, "Who was holding the camera?"
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
So true...It seems like the only time we make quick progress in this country is when some outsider sparks quick competetion. Like developing the A-Bomb before our enemies and the moon landing. If Russia said today that they were going to put a man on Mars in five years, we would probably get off our asses and get it done in 4 years. This is the way America operates. We always seem to need a swift quick in the butt to get the ball rolling.

I think by "laziness" he was referring to the conspiracy nutbags.
 

New member
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
9,069
Tokens
I saw a television show that talked about all the theories that the moon landing was fake.

They debunked every theory.
 

Undercover Spelling and Grammar Police
Joined
Sep 2, 2005
Messages
1,799
Tokens
its amazing to me that one of mans greatest achievements of landing on the moon would be re-recorded over. they spend billions upon billions of dollars over the years but cant afford another tape to copy on?

i dont believe it im sure nasa has it stashed away somewhere

My ex-wife did this with my archives of Bugs Bunny tapes. Needless to say, this is one of the big reasons why she's my ex.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,941
Tokens
Heres a question, was there a live communication from the moon, or space machine, to the communications center?
Now, if there was, please tell me how that was possible, back then,
We knw that in todays age, you need a unch of cell towers to communicate properly, from state to state etc, ho far can we communicate from earth. Thats the first queesion,
then the second is, I remember seeing this Fox report a few years ago about a possible fake ness of the moon landing, and it caught my attention, now, If they landed on the moon, what about the flying flag, the shadows or lack there of, the mchine we see, is that really the machine they used to land on the moon??
 

A Separate Reality
Joined
Jan 14, 2002
Messages
5,533
Tokens
Here's a question, was there a live communication from the moon, or space machine, to the communications center?
Now, if there was, please tell me how that was possible, back then,
We know that in today's age, you need a bunch of cell towers to communicate properly, from state to state etc, ho far can we communicate from earth. That's the first question,
then the second is, I remember seeing this Fox report a few years ago about a possible fakeness of the moon landing, and it caught my attention, now, If they landed on the moon, what about the flying flag, the shadows or lack there of, the machine we see, is that really the machine they used to land on the moon??

I remember reading in the LA times the following day of the moon landing, " As every school children knows", (I added the As every...)there is no atmosphere on the moon and thus no wind. So in order to give the illusion of a fluttering flag, NASA constructed a special flag with wires embedded.

This was common knowledge and I remember some kid talking about it on show and tell the next morning at school.

Funny how now years later, the fluttering flag has become the symbol for uneducated conspiracy theorists.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
5,666
Tokens
Heres a question, was there a live communication from the moon, or space machine, to the communications center?
Now, if there was, please tell me how that was possible, back then,
We knw that in todays age, you need a unch of cell towers to communicate properly, from state to state etc, ho far can we communicate from earth.

Radio communication. It's been possible since Mr. Marconi invented the wireless.

Contact is still received from the Voyager space probes, and those are more than 10 billion miles away now.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
6,066
Tokens
Radio communication. It's been possible since Mr. Marconi invented the wireless.

Contact is still received from the Voyager space probes, and those are more than 10 billion miles away now.

furthermore the SETI project is listening to radio signals from much much further away

of course that with the Earths rotation and all that, there was the need for multiple radio stations on Earth, which is of course the same stuff being used nowdays......when the shuttle orbits the Earth
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
Heres a question, was there a live communication from the moon, or space machine, to the communications center?
Now, if there was, please tell me how that was possible, back then,
We knw that in todays age, you need a unch of cell towers to communicate properly, from state to state etc, ho far can we communicate from earth. Thats the first queesion,
then the second is, I remember seeing this Fox report a few years ago about a possible fake ness of the moon landing, and it caught my attention, now, If they landed on the moon, what about the flying flag, the shadows or lack there of, the mchine we see, is that really the machine they used to land on the moon??

Holy fuck it just keeps getting worse in this thread. Seriously, maybe we'd be doing the universe a favor if a big fucking comet took us all out. Jesus Christ.

Another example of the laziness that wolfie was referring to and people saying, "I don't understand how it happened so it must have been fake."

Here's your answer that you could have found yourself with 3 seconds of Googling:

hskantennanight_sm.jpg


You can go here: http://www.honeysucklecreek.net/station/technical.html to read all about how they communicated with each other and you'll find that it really was very easy. Learn how radio waves work, for chrissakes. Somehow I doubt you'll take the time to educate yourself because it's so much easier to sit in your chair with a mouthful of Doritos and second guess those who dedicated their lives to human beings travelling to outer space.
 

Breaking Bad Snob
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
13,430
Tokens
These fuckers might frustrate me even more than Young Earthers.
 

Rx God
Joined
Nov 1, 2002
Messages
39,226
Tokens
One would need to be an engineer ( of the era) to effectively opine if this landing was technically feasible at the time. Let's just say I have some doubts....

I guess SS also was/is a doubter ? Thread title suggests so !
 

New member
Joined
Aug 12, 2006
Messages
3,331
Tokens
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PwYWqra2jJA&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PwYWqra2jJA&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
6,066
Tokens
One would need to be an engineer ( of the era) to effectively opine if this landing was technically feasible at the time. Let's just say I have some doubts....

I guess SS also was/is a doubter ? Thread title suggests so !

no, not really

you would have to be an engineer (of the era) to propose that it was NOT and then provide evidence to that effect, the burden of proof is on the one making the claim

landing on the moon was a great achievement in many fields but to suggest that simply because the computers of the era were primitive to what we have now and that THAT is 'proof' that it was 'impossible'....is simply not sound logic (on similar 'logic' you could say that because Lindberg plane was primitive compared to a boeing 777 it is impossible do a transatlantic crossing)

also its not valid for everyone to say "I don't believe it, I just don't" simply because someone felt like it.

btw for the ones that like to research/read more (on top of the book I already posted...) here

http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/07/21/0142234 (note added by me, what happens when your computer has very little memory and speed.....you write GREAT and OPTIMIZED code .....what happens when you can get a computer with gazillion gigs of memory and dual cores etc.......well you get vista :)
 

Honey Badger Don't Give A Shit
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
46,540
Tokens
easy fellas...Dude has spent the past couple years being unable to decide if he should divorce his wife who he attests to hate and you're expecting him to make a firm decision as to the validity of the Apollo moon landings?
 

Rx God
Joined
Nov 1, 2002
Messages
39,226
Tokens
easy fellas...Dude has spent the past couple years being unable to decide if he should divorce his wife who he attests to hate and you're expecting him to make a firm decision as to the validity of the Apollo moon landings?


and, Steve.... the correlation to my marriage and Apollo is ???
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
34,892
Tokens
http://www.ktnv.com/Global/story.asp?S=13233793&clienttype=printable


discovery-news-logo.png

Long-Lost Footage of Apollo 11 Mission Surfaces

Lost for decades and found badly damaged, the footage offers a brief glimpse of Neil Armstrong's historic moonwalk.

Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:00 PM ET | content provided by AFP

Long-lost footage of Neil Armstrong descending the ladder of the Apollo 11 lunar module will be screened in public for the first time in Sydney next week, a prominent astronomer told AFP.
The footage runs for a few minutes and is considered to be some of the best footage of the historic 1969 moonwalk, but the film was lost in archives for many years and was badly damaged when found, said John Sarkissian.
It depicts the first few minutes of Armstrong's descent which was recorded in Australia as NASA was still scrambling for a signal, showing a far clearer image than was initially screened worldwide.
Telescopes in remote Australia played a key role in the Apollo 11 mission, including provision of the television signal, after Armstrong decided to attempt the moonwalk early, putting the United States just beyond the horizon.

Sarkissian -- historian and astronomer in charge of the Australian side of the recordings restoration project -- said the unseen minutes were the "best quality of Armstrong descending the ladder." "NASA were using the Goldstone (California) station signal, which had its settings wrong, but in the signals being received by the Australian stations you can actually see Armstrong," he said. "In what people have seen before you can barely see Armstrong at all, you can see something black -- that was his leg."
The segment which runs for "just a few minutes" will be screened at the awards night of Australian Geographic magazine next Wednesday, at which Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin will be the chief guest.
"When we heard Buzz was going to be the guest of honor we thought 'what a great opportunity'," Sarkissian said.
The Armstrong footage, which has only previously been seen by Apollo veterans and other members of the astronomy community, would form part of a highlights reel of restored, digitized moonwalk footage at the awards, he added.
There was a "long detective story" involved in the search for the footage and Sarkissian said it took painstaking frame by frame work to shift the material from the deteriorating black and white film to digital format.
"It was very damaged tape as well, that segment of Armstrong at the beginning," he said.
Digitizing the recording was "significant in the space flight history context" allowing it to be preserved and copied for future generations, said Sarkissian.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
1,502
Tokens
the moon landing was FAKE!!!!!

the evidence is overwhelming.......
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,989
Messages
13,575,863
Members
100,889
Latest member
junkerb
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com