As I have made quite clear, I will not be X'ing any Box with the name Hillary Clinton under any circumstances. I'm beggin the R's to come up with a good alternative. But not because of false, made up BS like the above. You should stop blindly relying on these crazy wingnut sites which make things up. Good job Scott!!!:aktion033
As I have made quite clear, I will not be X'ing any Box with the name Hillary Clinton under any circumstances. I'm beggin the R's to come up with a good alternative. But not because of false, made up BS like the above. You should stop blindly relying on these crazy wingnut sites which make things up. Good job Scott!!!:aktion033
That was just an email that is circulating (or recirculating). I never even checked it out. You should notice I said here is one to chew on. The bottom line is that if what you say here is true we are actually on the same page. The Republican Party is the only viable opposition to the Democratic Party. They are the only alternative. The anti-Bush movement made Obama a shoe in. If anyone disagrees with his agenda, the Alinsky agenda to achieve socialism, then how can they vote for Hillary, the person Alinsky offered a job to. Come on, at this point whoever the Republicans put out there is a good alternative if you want this country to have a chance to recover from the damage this administration has caused. In fact Romney was a good alternative and if you mean what you say then looking back that should be becoming more and more clear. As far as Snopes goes we have been down that road, they lean left.
Nope, The Dems have lost any chance at my vote in 2016 if their candidate is Hillary. Now the R's have to earn my vote. I voted for the right guy in 2008, and in 2012 considering the alternatives, and would do so again without hesitation. In 2016, if the R's put up Huntsman, they have my vote. Other than that, they probably don't, and I'm going 3rd party, but I'm giving them the chance. I won't vote for Cruz, Santorum, or any other wingnut loon. I'd vote for Christie, but this bridge thing has killed him, and it should. He either lied or showed incredible incompetence in choosing staff. I love Rand Paul's foreign Policy, but not much else, and it would be very, very hard to X his box. Rubio is a grade A phony. Walker is too anti Union for my tastes. Give me a common sense R and I'm there.
Snopes doesn't lean left, they don't lean, and much of the stuff you rely on and post in your dot connecting is exactly like that bogus E Mail. I suspect if Scott didn't set you straight, you'd be sill arguing the E Mail was legit. When connecting your dots, always go to legit sites to check them, instead of blindly relying on the sites you do.
You don't check out any of the shit you post. And even though Scott showed you a site that disproves it I'm sure you still believe it. That's how loons work. Just like you trying to act as if Hillary Clinton is going to follow Alinsky's "plan" just because he offered her a job 50 years ago. That's how crazy people think. Your dots are all ridiculous and most of it is pure conjecture or bullshit.
Snopes got kicked around here long ago. They don't lean, right. I am not arguing that the email is legit I put it on here for the reason I stated. Snopes was just fine straightening out things like urban legends but they are political, they do lean. So may I ask once again, have you ever connected the dots between Obama and his background and associates using whatever sources you normally use. Still wondering because if you had how could you have possibly voted for Obama. If nothing else I am proud of the fact I did not vote for him.
I did read the entire Snopes article just now. I noticed it was updated in Jan 2014. In referring to Hillary and her participation it uses the following terms - "minor perepheral way" and "tangential participation". So it does try to diminish her involvement but it does not deny it either. It states more or less that there is no tangible proof she did this or that but at the same time offers no real proof. It is adament that she had no role in the final determination of the case etc. I guess it all depends on how you define "leaning." It all came down near the Yale campus and obviously Hillary was an activist. Snopes even tries to diminish that.
Lmao!! It's absolutely amazing how you can come to these conclusions reading the same stuff everyone else can read. Here is exactly what the article said...
Hillary Rodham (as she was known then) wasn't a lawyer then, either: She was a Yale law student, and like many of her politically-minded fellow law students who saw the latest "trial of the century" taking place just outside the main gate of their school, she took advantage of an opportunity to be involved in the case in a minor, peripheral way by organizing other students to help the American Civil Liberties Union monitor the trials for civil rights violations. Her tangential participation in the trial in no way helped "free" Black Panthers tried for the murder of Alex Rackle
Here you go:
December 12, 2007
Hillary Clinton, cultural Marxist
By Carey Roberts
When Hillary Rodham arrived at Yale Law School in the fall of 1969, the long-awaited Revolution seemed to be at hand. Students declared a "liberated zone" on the main quadrangle and erected tents for endless teach-ins. The university was forced to adopt pass-fail grading. And the pungent scent of sweet-smelling marijuana was redolent in the autumn air.
Within months of her arrival, Hillary signed on to the board of editors of the newly-established Yale Review of Law and Social Action. The Review's purpose was "to present forms of legal scholarship and journalism which focus on programmatic solutions to social problems." The cover photo of the first issue depicted police brandishing weapons to illustrate an article on "University and the Police: Force and Freedom on Campus."
One of Hillary's closest faculty mentors was Thomas I. Emerson, a constitutional scholar affectionately known as "Tommie the Commie." It was in his class that Hillary first laid eyes on a bearded William Jefferson Clinton. She sported Gloria Steinem glasses and board-straight long hair — the former Goldwater Girl had turned iconic hippie.
That spring Rodham signed up for Emerson's civil liberties class, notes Carl Bernstein in A Woman in Charge. The course entailed monitoring the local trial of Black Panther Bobby Seale who had allegedly murdered a former Panther-turned-police-informant. Hillary was charged with scheduling the student watch-dogs so every minute of the trial would be scrutinized. After all, who could trust White Man's justice?
A subsequent edition of the Review of Law and Social Action was devoted to the Black Panther trial. The issue featured drawings of policemen depicted as decapitated and eviscerated pigs. By now Hillary had been promoted to associate editor of the magazine.
Interesting note, Hillary's personal involvement with the Black Panther trial or the Review of Law and Social Action is never mentioned in her autobiography.
Barbara Olson, writing in The Final Days, reveals how Hillary studied the Critical Legal Studies school. Unabashedly Marxist, Critical Legal Studies uses a "deconstructionist" model to subvert the law and engineer social transformation.
During this time Rodham met Marian Wright Edelman of the Children's Defense Fund who soon became Hillary's confidante. Hillary spent the summer of 1970 in Washington DC working at her side. Edelman would later admit to the truth of her duplicitous agenda: "I got the idea that children might be a very effective way to broaden the base for change."
Beginning her second year at Yale, Hillary devoted herself to the cause of abused and neglected children, once helping a local hospital to develop legal procedures to deal with suspected child abuse. Another time she helped represent a foster mother adopt her two-year old ward.
Those experiences led Rodham to publish "Children under the Law" in the Harvard Educational Review. That article ridiculed the antiquated notion that families should be seen as "private, nonpolitical units." Making the over-the-top comparison that, "Along with the family, past and present examples of such [dependency] arrangements include marriage, slavery, and the Indian reservation system," Rodham argued for the need to "remodel" the family and grant children a legal right to sue their parents.
The summer of 1971 Hillary traveled to California to work at the Oakland law office of Robert Treuhaft, described by the New York Times as a "radical law firm that specialized in fighting every kind of discrimination and social injustice."
Treuhaft was a former member of the Communist Party USA, leaving the party only after Khrushchev's revelations about Stalin's massacres. Treuhaft later confided that Hillary "certainly ... was in sympathy with all the left causes."
The following summer Hillary found herself working for the George McGovern presidential campaign in Texas. McGovern, the anti-war candidate, had earlier headed the Democratic commission that mandated quotas for women and Blacks in state delegations.
By the end of her stint at Yale, friend Sara Ehrman described Hillary's politics as "liberal, ideological." Representative Dick Armey was more candid: "Her thoughts sound a lot like Karl Marx. She hangs around with a lot of Marxists. All her friends are Marxists." Author Barbara Olson put it this way: "Hillary was a budding Leninist, Menshevik, Bolshevik, Trotskyite ... What really mattered to Lenin — and what Saul Alinsky taught Hillary to value — was power."
Pinch yourself — this is the same Hillary Rodham Clinton who is now serving as the honorable senator from New York, who aspires to the United States presidency, and who seeks to "remodel" our families to conform to a socialist utopia.
Notable Attacks:
As a member of the Weatherman, Ayers had a hand in several attacks, all designed to protest the Vietnam War and racism in the United States, including:
anyone that thinks Ayers isn't a terrorist outta give their heads a shake.
I suppose this isn't an orange either?
http://terrorism.about.com/od/groupsleader1/p/Bill_Ayers.htm
As a member of the Weatherman, Ayers had a hand in several attacks, all designed to protest the Vietnam War and racism in the United States, including:
- 1970: Bombing of New York City Police Headquarters
- 1971: Bombing of U.S. Capitol Building
- 1972: Bombing of Pentagon
anyone that thinks Ayers isn't a terrorist outta give their heads a shake.
I suppose this isn't an orange either?
http://terrorism.about.com/od/groupsleader1/p/Bill_Ayers.htm
Washington Post:
When Hillary Rodham Clinton questioned rival Barack Obama's ties to 1960s radicals, her comments baffled two retired Bay Area lawyers who knew Clinton in the summer of 1971 when she worked as an intern at a left-wing law firm in Oakland, Calif., that defended communists and Black Panthers.
"She's a hypocrite," Doris B. Walker, 89, who was a member of the American Communist Party, said in an interview last week. "She had to know who we were and what kinds of cases we were handling. We had a very left-wing reputation, including civil rights, constitutional law, racist problems."
Malcolm Burnstein, 74, a partner at the firm who worked closely with Clinton during her internship, said he was traveling in Pennsylvania in April when Clinton attacked Obama for his past interactions with William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, members of Students for a Democratic Society who went on to found the bomb-making Weather Underground.
"Given her background, it was quite hypocritical," Burnstein said. "I almost called the Philadelphia Inquirer. I saw what she and her campaign were saying about Ayers and I thought, 'Well, if you're going to talk about that totally bit of irrelevant nonsense, I'll talk about your career with us.' "
Read the whole story: Washington Post
Does this article infer that the firm she worked for defended Black Panthers. Nah
Washington Post:
When Hillary Rodham Clinton questioned rival Barack Obama's ties to 1960s radicals, her comments baffled two retired Bay Area lawyers who knew Clinton in the summer of 1971 when she worked as an intern at a left-wing law firm in Oakland, Calif., that defended communists and Black Panthers.
"She's a hypocrite," Doris B. Walker, 89, who was a member of the American Communist Party, said in an interview last week. "She had to know who we were and what kinds of cases we were handling. We had a very left-wing reputation, including civil rights, constitutional law, racist problems."
Malcolm Burnstein, 74, a partner at the firm who worked closely with Clinton during her internship, said he was traveling in Pennsylvania in April when Clinton attacked Obama for his past interactions with William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, members of Students for a Democratic Society who went on to found the bomb-making Weather Underground.
"Given her background, it was quite hypocritical," Burnstein said. "I almost called the Philadelphia Inquirer. I saw what she and her campaign were saying about Ayers and I thought, 'Well, if you're going to talk about that totally bit of irrelevant nonsense, I'll talk about your career with us.' "
Read the whole story: Washington Post
Does this article infer that the firm she worked for defended Black Panthers. Nah
That was 40 years ago, she was an intern working for a law firm that dealt with civil rights cases. She should be in prison, lol.
