J. R. Miller
GIANTS +1.5 -126 at Indians (Zito-Sowers) (OR +161)
BLUEJAYS -165 over Reds (Halladay-Harang) (OR -1.5 +132)
REDSOX -148 over Diamondbacks (Wakefield-Johnson)
CUBS -175 over Orioles (Lilly-Burres)
ROYALS +108 over Rockies (Hochevar-Cook)
Comments:
In the Giants/Indians' game, we like the moneyline on the Giants (+161) about as much as the runline (-126), and in the Reds/Bluejays' game we like the runline on the Bluejays (+132) about as much as the moneyline (-165). Six of one, half-a-dozen of the other. Here in the newsletter we took the conservative choices.
If you agree with these three big moneyline favorites today, (the Bluejays, Redsox and Cubs), you might consider using a 2- or 3-bet parlay. If you do use a parlay, remember to risk the same as you risk on individual bets. If you risk "100" on single bets, be sure to risk "100" on your parlays.
GIANTS +1.5 -126 at Indians (Zito-Sowers) (OR +161)
BLUEJAYS -165 over Reds (Halladay-Harang) (OR -1.5 +132)
REDSOX -148 over Diamondbacks (Wakefield-Johnson)
CUBS -175 over Orioles (Lilly-Burres)
ROYALS +108 over Rockies (Hochevar-Cook)
Comments:
In the Giants/Indians' game, we like the moneyline on the Giants (+161) about as much as the runline (-126), and in the Reds/Bluejays' game we like the runline on the Bluejays (+132) about as much as the moneyline (-165). Six of one, half-a-dozen of the other. Here in the newsletter we took the conservative choices.
If you agree with these three big moneyline favorites today, (the Bluejays, Redsox and Cubs), you might consider using a 2- or 3-bet parlay. If you do use a parlay, remember to risk the same as you risk on individual bets. If you risk "100" on single bets, be sure to risk "100" on your parlays.
Robert Ferringo - only a couple of games today
3-Unit Play. Take #920 Houston (-145) over Texas (8 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
2.5-Unit Play. Take #923 Colorado (-115) over Kansas City (8 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
2-Unit Play. Take #914 New York Mets (-1.5, +100) over Seattle (7 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
1.5-Unit Play. Take #929 Chicago White Sox (-115) over Los Angeles Dodgers (10 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
Today's totals:
2-Unit Play. Take ‘Over’ 8.0 (+100) Minnesota at San Diego (10 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
2-Unit Play. Take ‘Over’ 10.0 Baltimore at Chicago Cubs (8 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
1.5-Unit Play. Take ‘Over’ 9.0 Seattle at New York Mets (7 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
1.5-Unit Play. Take ‘Over’ 9.0 (-105) Colorado at Kansas City (8 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
1.5-Unit Play. Take ‘Over’ 8.5 (-115) Philadelphia at Oakland (10 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
1.5-Unit Play. Take ‘Over’ 8.0 Los Angeles Angels at Washington (7 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
1.5-Unit Play. Take 'Under' 10.0 San Francisco at Cleveland (7 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
3-Unit Play. Take #920 Houston (-145) over Texas (8 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
2.5-Unit Play. Take #923 Colorado (-115) over Kansas City (8 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
2-Unit Play. Take #914 New York Mets (-1.5, +100) over Seattle (7 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
1.5-Unit Play. Take #929 Chicago White Sox (-115) over Los Angeles Dodgers (10 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
Today's totals:
2-Unit Play. Take ‘Over’ 8.0 (+100) Minnesota at San Diego (10 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
2-Unit Play. Take ‘Over’ 10.0 Baltimore at Chicago Cubs (8 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
1.5-Unit Play. Take ‘Over’ 9.0 Seattle at New York Mets (7 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
1.5-Unit Play. Take ‘Over’ 9.0 (-105) Colorado at Kansas City (8 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
1.5-Unit Play. Take ‘Over’ 8.5 (-115) Philadelphia at Oakland (10 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
1.5-Unit Play. Take ‘Over’ 8.0 Los Angeles Angels at Washington (7 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
1.5-Unit Play. Take 'Under' 10.0 San Francisco at Cleveland (7 p.m., Wednesday, June 25)
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR bgColor=#dddddd><TD vAlign=top>Winners Inc.</TD><TD vAlign=top align=right>Guaranteed Selections</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top>Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2008
$25.00 Guaranteed: Today in Baseball we are featuring our 5000* BASEBALL WINNER! You can get this WINNER for just $25 and you are GUARANTEED TO WIN or you will not be charged! We are currently on a REMARKABLE 87-41 run with all of our guaranteed selections including 40-16 our last 56 selections! So far this year in Baseball we are 52-26 for PLUS 17.8 UNITS!</TD><TD vAlign=top noWrap align=right>6/25/2008</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2> </TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2>5000* BASEBALL WINNER
Florida w/Tucker +120 7:10 EST</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Woof!
$25.00 Guaranteed: Today in Baseball we are featuring our 5000* BASEBALL WINNER! You can get this WINNER for just $25 and you are GUARANTEED TO WIN or you will not be charged! We are currently on a REMARKABLE 87-41 run with all of our guaranteed selections including 40-16 our last 56 selections! So far this year in Baseball we are 52-26 for PLUS 17.8 UNITS!</TD><TD vAlign=top noWrap align=right>6/25/2008</TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2> </TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2>5000* BASEBALL WINNER
Florida w/Tucker +120 7:10 EST</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Woof!
W.underdog
Another big day yesterday as they nailed their 5 unit play on Minnesota as a +147 dog. They had a 3-1 finish for +9.3 units. Yesterday's win sent them over the +100 unit mark as we now sit at +101.6 units and 60% (119-79) over the last six weeks.
Very impressive.
Today:
4 Units: Kansas City
4 Units: Minnesotta
Another big day yesterday as they nailed their 5 unit play on Minnesota as a +147 dog. They had a 3-1 finish for +9.3 units. Yesterday's win sent them over the +100 unit mark as we now sit at +101.6 units and 60% (119-79) over the last six weeks.
Very impressive.
Today:
4 Units: Kansas City
4 Units: Minnesotta
Wed, 06/25/08 - 7:10 PMvegas-runner | MLB RunLine Single-Dime Bet
914 NYM -1.5 (+100) Sportsbetting.com vs 913 SEA
Analysis: * 1* RL WAGER *
Wed, 06/25/08 - 8:05 PMvegas-runner | MLB RunLine Single-Dime Bet
922 CHC -1.5 (+105) Sportsbetting.com vs 921 BAL
Analysis: * 1* RL WAGER *
Wed, 06/25/08 - 7:05 PMvegas-runner | MLB RunLine Triple-Dime Bet
903 SFG 1.5 (-130) Sportsbetting.com vs 904 CLE
vegas-runner | MLB Money Line Double-Dime Bet
927 MIN (+120) Bodog vs 928 SDP
Analysis: ** 2* ML WAGER **
914 NYM -1.5 (+100) Sportsbetting.com vs 913 SEA
Analysis: * 1* RL WAGER *
Wed, 06/25/08 - 8:05 PMvegas-runner | MLB RunLine Single-Dime Bet
922 CHC -1.5 (+105) Sportsbetting.com vs 921 BAL
Analysis: * 1* RL WAGER *
Wed, 06/25/08 - 7:05 PMvegas-runner | MLB RunLine Triple-Dime Bet
903 SFG 1.5 (-130) Sportsbetting.com vs 904 CLE
vegas-runner | MLB Money Line Double-Dime Bet
927 MIN (+120) Bodog vs 928 SDP
Analysis: ** 2* ML WAGER **
I guess YWN sucks now. Just look at these horrendous records. Granted, it does not show units won and lost for each capper, but unless you have proof that the records are wrong or you have records showing units won and lost for every game (the information is available at their site each day) for a capper (using the books with the best juice), then I do not understand negative comments to the effect that these cappers have now become crap.
Perhaps megamillions can weigh in on the legitimacy of the records and the units won.
If you think that every capper is going to be hot to your satisfaction or as a group will have a great record every day, then you should not be gambling. Or if by playing hit and miss with these cappers you think that you can come to a legitimate judgment about any of them, you should not be gambling.
And for those that do not like chalk, chalk does not mean anything, it is the units won and units lost that counts and nothing else. If you do not like the chalk, you can play the game at minus one run by playing some at the runline and some at the moneyline where you end up with a push if the team wins by one run.
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap> The Experts</TD><TD noWrap align=right>14-4</TD><TD noWrap align=right>77.78%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
Andrew Powers</TD><TD noWrap align=right>15-5</TD><TD noWrap align=right>75.00%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
William Kidd</TD><TD noWrap align=right>17-6</TD><TD noWrap align=right>73.91%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
The Consensus Group</TD><TD noWrap align=right>15-7</TD><TD noWrap align=right>68.18%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
Wizard of Odds</TD><TD noWrap align=right>12-6</TD><TD noWrap align=right>66.67%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" style="BACKGROUND: #ffffff" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
System Sports</TD><TD noWrap align=right>4-2</TD><TD noWrap align=right>66.67%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
Jimmy Thompson</TD><TD noWrap align=right>4-2</TD><TD noWrap align=right>66.67%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
Rocco Vincintore</TD><TD noWrap align=right>19-10</TD><TD noWrap align=right>65.52%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
Jack Clayton</TD><TD noWrap align=right>49-26</TD><TD noWrap align=right>65.33%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
The Hitman</TD><TD noWrap align=right>16-9</TD><TD noWrap align=right>64.00%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
Insiders Sports Network</TD><TD noWrap align=right>14-8</TD><TD noWrap align=right>63.64%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
Steam On-Line</TD><TD noWrap align=right>17-10</TD><TD noWrap align=right>62.96%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
Computer Crushers</TD><TD noWrap align=right>16-10</TD><TD noWrap align=right>61.54%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
Dr Baseball</TD><TD noWrap align=right>16-10</TD><TD noWrap align=right>61.54%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
Winners Inc.</TD><TD noWrap align=right>14-9</TD><TD noWrap align=right>60.87%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
Kevin Francis</TD><TD noWrap align=right>6-4</TD><TD noWrap align=right>60.00%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
Brian Graves</TD><TD noWrap align=right>9-6</TD><TD noWrap align=right>60.00%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
Steve Zukiel</TD><TD noWrap align=right>13-9</TD><TD noWrap align=right>59.09%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
The Hammer</TD><TD noWrap align=right>10-7</TD><TD noWrap align=right>58.82%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
Tom Stryker</TD><TD noWrap align=right>21-15</TD><TD noWrap align=right>58.33%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
The Millionaires Club</TD><TD noWrap align=right>11-8</TD><TD noWrap align=right>57.89%</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Perhaps megamillions can weigh in on the legitimacy of the records and the units won.
If you think that every capper is going to be hot to your satisfaction or as a group will have a great record every day, then you should not be gambling. Or if by playing hit and miss with these cappers you think that you can come to a legitimate judgment about any of them, you should not be gambling.
And for those that do not like chalk, chalk does not mean anything, it is the units won and units lost that counts and nothing else. If you do not like the chalk, you can play the game at minus one run by playing some at the runline and some at the moneyline where you end up with a push if the team wins by one run.
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=2 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap> The Experts</TD><TD noWrap align=right>14-4</TD><TD noWrap align=right>77.78%</TD></TR><TR onmouseover="this.style.background = '#FFFFFF'" style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%" onmouseout="this.style.background = '';"><TD noWrap>
youwin is smoke and mirrors, the idea is that if you lay 140-180 one play a day every day you'll hit at a good enough percentage to continue to sell to suckers buying into the winning percentage and not units. When these guys aren't hot they get murdered because they are laying such high numbers. Overall on the season they have to hit well over 60 percent to turn profit to make up for the amt of juice they lay, nevermind the fact that your paying for the service as well. Anyone can lay heavy juice day after day and run around in a circle like 95% of the guys on uwin do but the real way to make money during baseball is small priced favorites, underdogs and totals.
VEGAS RUNNER
FREE FORUM WAGERS :
JUNE = 14-7 (67%)....2008 = 151-72 (68%)...Over 220 FREE Bets...
1.) CUBS -1.5 (+105) (1*)...this may be one of the "squarest" bets on the board, but the oddsmakers went ahead and showed us exactly what they think the outcome will be with the 40cent jump in the opening number from last night's match-up...and more importantly, the books showed no reluctance to move that even higher...all the way to -200, with no fear of "steam" taking the plus money. Without going through details about the offensive and defensive power-rating edge the Cubs have in this match-up tonight...the fact that they are just so dominant at home, where they have a SLG% of Over ".500", and now facing a LHP ...after losing at home...and also starting Lilly, who they have won 6 of 8 home games with...and the only concern I can possibly see is the fact we are going to go ahead and make it a RL bet to avoid the big chalk. Best of Luck, VR...
FREE FORUM WAGERS :
JUNE = 14-7 (67%)....2008 = 151-72 (68%)...Over 220 FREE Bets...
1.) CUBS -1.5 (+105) (1*)...this may be one of the "squarest" bets on the board, but the oddsmakers went ahead and showed us exactly what they think the outcome will be with the 40cent jump in the opening number from last night's match-up...and more importantly, the books showed no reluctance to move that even higher...all the way to -200, with no fear of "steam" taking the plus money. Without going through details about the offensive and defensive power-rating edge the Cubs have in this match-up tonight...the fact that they are just so dominant at home, where they have a SLG% of Over ".500", and now facing a LHP ...after losing at home...and also starting Lilly, who they have won 6 of 8 home games with...and the only concern I can possibly see is the fact we are going to go ahead and make it a RL bet to avoid the big chalk. Best of Luck, VR...
Potentially can be smoke and mirrors if you do not give units won and units lost, and how much smoke and how much mirror depends on how much of a difference between the two records. Not long ago I posted that Winners Inc had a units winning % of 60% using his won/loss record and net units and assuming all of the winners were favorites. I think his won/loss record was around 65%. In this case the smoke and mirrors amounted to around 5%.
Try to look at this objectively, at least let me do that for the group here. I dont do anything with these plays so no issue either way to me.
Winners is one you usually get day in day out. They're run is 14-9. Lets assume avg juice per play is 150 (Im pretty sure it would be higher if we went back over all 23 plays). Betting 100 per game. Thats 9 loss at $150 = $1350. 14 win at 100 = $1400. Up 50 gross, minus $25 x 23 picks = $575. So you owuld be down $525 playing each play in that run.
Win percentage isnt what it appears to mean when betting baseball. You can do the same math on the others. To their defense, they have had some good straight win streaks on a short term basis.
Winners is one you usually get day in day out. They're run is 14-9. Lets assume avg juice per play is 150 (Im pretty sure it would be higher if we went back over all 23 plays). Betting 100 per game. Thats 9 loss at $150 = $1350. 14 win at 100 = $1400. Up 50 gross, minus $25 x 23 picks = $575. So you owuld be down $525 playing each play in that run.
Win percentage isnt what it appears to mean when betting baseball. You can do the same math on the others. To their defense, they have had some good straight win streaks on a short term basis.
