Pitt covers, u are right, it ain't over until its over
Top Shelf Chicago 12/27
Game #
NCAAF #220
PLAY 1
Clemson -6.5
Dime rating
2*
Outcome
22 to win 20
Clemson is one of the bigger consensus bowl plays this year. They have the Best player in SPiller. They have fared well against one dimensional offenses. They have auxiliary players at wide out whom can score from anywhere on the field. I like them here.
The argument can be made that Randall Cobb is Spiller's match. He has TD's rushing, receiving and on returns. He has not gotten any support from his teammates. Including the 3 QB's they have played, no one has more than 6 TD's this year. Hartline, today's probable starter, has not played since 10/10-09. Just too much to put on Cobb.
Both these teams play in big conferences. Clemson has made the adjustments and played with teams like Kentucky. I see them running away here.
Game #
NCAAF #220
PLAY 1
Clemson -6.5
Dime rating
2*
Outcome
22 to win 20
Clemson is one of the bigger consensus bowl plays this year. They have the Best player in SPiller. They have fared well against one dimensional offenses. They have auxiliary players at wide out whom can score from anywhere on the field. I like them here.
The argument can be made that Randall Cobb is Spiller's match. He has TD's rushing, receiving and on returns. He has not gotten any support from his teammates. Including the 3 QB's they have played, no one has more than 6 TD's this year. Hartline, today's probable starter, has not played since 10/10-09. Just too much to put on Cobb.
Both these teams play in big conferences. Clemson has made the adjustments and played with teams like Kentucky. I see them running away here.
Complete bullshit!! He did not play it at +3. Thats the problem with all this BW stuff. People are trying to put this stuff out there like they are in the know. BW would never play it at +3 when there were much better numbers earlier that he played it at. You think the most successful sports better would play +3 when he had +7 just a couple days ago? no he would not. You are getting bad info or just posting to make yourself look cool.
I would agree with the above ....he would not take +3.
He and the computer boys didnt make there millions betting bad numbers
i would bet he took ( if he wagered the game ) +5.5 or better
Just my opinion.....having said all that and watching the jets offense last week i laid -3 -115...
Good luck to all
BIGTEX5,
If you knew BW took it at 6.5, why didn't you post it before someone actually made a post with his pick? 6.5 was long gone before today. But I never read a post from you telling everyone BW was on the Jets +6.5 until today (since you say you knew for a fact BW had Jets +6.5). Why come in here and bash someone, when you purposely held out?
If you knew BW took it at 6.5, why didn't you post it before someone actually made a post with his pick? 6.5 was long gone before today. But I never read a post from you telling everyone BW was on the Jets +6.5 until today (since you say you knew for a fact BW had Jets +6.5). Why come in here and bash someone, when you purposely held out?
Yet Big i saw that....just commenting on the +3
funny to see all the touts today giving the game at +5 or more
cracks me up...
I made a post earlier thinking indy would not throw in the towel today in front of the home crowd so i laid the 3 seeing a ton of value with my methods.
hope it falls 4 or 5 LOL
good luck and thanks
Stu
