That's the truth, Jimmy Hoffa.
Now, I figure 70 years of history and 22 teams on average. 2 quarterbacks per team and say a 5 year career for the quarterbacks....not perfect but gets us a conservative number of people......conservative meaning a number WAY lower than reality and it will still make my point.
70 years * 22 teams = 1540 team-years. 1540 team-years * 2 quarterbacks per team = 3080 quarterback-years. 3080 quarterback years / 5 years per quarterback = 616 quarterbacks that have played and that is a very conservative number. VERY conservative as now teams have three quarterbacks and many guys were less than 5 years in NFL....BUT, we have 616.
616 quarterbacks total including black and white quarterbacks.
Now, 30/616 = 5% of all quarterbacks ever were/are black. Now, if you would have given me twenty quarterbacks (more realistic in my opinion...but hey) my numbers would be 3%, but fine.
Finally, I am just saying one thing: you are making assumptions about skin color indicating ability to play quarterback in the NFL by using a set of 5% of all quarterbacks to ever play! LOL! You should chuckle at that too....I'll wait until you are done.....
OK, now, if you took a random...RANDOM, set of 30 quarterbacks from the white pool of (616-30 = 586) 586 quarterbacks that have played....I would be willing to bet that the black fellows are doing (have done) just fine relative to them. I don't have facts, but I do have a good memory of my football and performance of players. The problem with your logic, in my honest opinion, is you are focusing too much emphasis on the black quarterbacks and are not considering how bad many of the white ones have been. My above logic is sound and I hope gets you to see at a minimum, your 5% 'sample' size (not really a sample as the black ones aren't randomly picked) is too small to determine very much at all. tulsa