It has never been debunked. It's actually been confirmed numerous times. You can almost count the climatologists throughout the world that disagree with climate change on one hand. It's almost a joke these days. That's why the POTUS is talking to educated students about climate change being proven to be a fact by scientists.
It has never been debunked. It's actually been confirmed numerous times. You can almost count the climatologists throughout the world that disagree with climate change on one hand. It's almost a joke these days. That's why the POTUS is talking to educated students about climate change being proven to be a fact by scientists.
debunked over and over and over and over and over and over and over over over and over and over and over and over and over and over over and over and over and over and over and over and over over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over
“I am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.” - Nobel Prize Winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever.
“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical.” - Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”
Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” - UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.
“The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t have open minds… I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists,” - Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet.
“The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC "are incorrect because they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.” - Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico
“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” - U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA.
“Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.” – . Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ.
“After reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri's asinine comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it's hard to remain quiet.” - Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society's Probability and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review.
“For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?" - Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at Uppsala University in Sweden.
“Gore prompted me to start delving into the science again and I quickly found myself solidly in the skeptic camp…Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.” - Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland, who reversed his belief in man-made warming to become a skeptic, is a former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee.
“Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined.” - Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh.
“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” - Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.
“CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another….Every scientist knows this, but it doesn’t pay to say so…Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver’s seat and developing nations walking barefoot.” - Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu University in Japan.
“The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something that generates funds.” - Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the Committee for Scientific Research in Buenos Aires and head of the Paleontology Department at the University of La Plata. # #
Lol, the thing that is so stupid, is I can provide quotes from people saying it is real. That's what's funny about you guys. You think because you find a couple guy saying they disagree than obviously Global Warming is false. Even if the vast majority of climatologists throughout the world say it is real.
It has never been debunked. In fact more and more people, especially the educated youth is understanding that man made climate change is a fact and it's something we have to deal with. That's why you belong to the retard bar.
ointer:
So what did man change when the earth was heating and cooling over the past thousand's of years to change the weather?
I cant find any information on any changes man has done during the "mediaeval warming period" or the "little ice age" ... or the droughts in the early 1900s when man was causing these global disasters.
Can we do what they have done in the past when the weather was changing? Why wouldn't that work now?
I'm still waiting for some scientist to tell us why the earth's climate cycle of 20k years of global warming followed by 70k years of global cooling has changed
because if it hasn't, then the next ice age is coming relatively soon
so, somebody please tell me why the earth won't undergo it's next cooling cycle
TIA
PS: the earth's climate is changing, it has been for 2 billion years, let's focus on something substantive as opposed to hyperbole
did you know? intestinal gas would cause man made global warming in libtardville too, should we control human population?
because if it hasn't, then the next ice age is coming relatively soon
so, somebody please tell me why the earth won't undergo it's next cooling cycle
TIA
PS: the earth's climate is changing, it has been for 2 billion years, let's focus on something substantive as opposed to hyperbole
did you know? intestinal gas would cause man made global warming in libtardville too, should we control human population?
I think we need to hold Ronald McDonald responsible for many of our problems today. After all, he both encourages obesity and is responsible for made man global warming because of (A) all the cows we harvest for burgers are farting and (B) the bigger farts obese people release
throw in the fact that he's personally responsible for the health care epidemic caused by Big Mac's, and it's a no brainer
we need to confiscate all the dirty money accumulated by McDonald's owners and give it to the politicians in DC to save our planet
"it's only fair"
throw in the fact that he's personally responsible for the health care epidemic caused by Big Mac's, and it's a no brainer
we need to confiscate all the dirty money accumulated by McDonald's owners and give it to the politicians in DC to save our planet
"it's only fair"
Well for one thing, dinosaurs weren't industrialized and didn't burn fossil fuels, lol. The argument is not that weather can't change on its own, it's that the change in weather is warming at a faster rate because of the shit we keep pumping in the air. The fact you don't think CO2 being pumped in the air can't have an effect on weather is hilarious. This isn't even really a debate anymore. Scientists know for a fact that man is increasing the rate of speed in which the earth is warming and if it continues there will be serious consequences.
Show me one credible scientist (not on the Obama payroll) who's sticking his neck out warning people about the dangers of 'warming'
Nope, it's all bullshit politicians (Gore, Obama, Kerry etc.) doing the demagoguing and fearmongering.
It has gotten so bad that the Aussie PM is putting together an alliance to stop these commie nut jobs.
Actual scientists
What is not a known fact is by how much the Earth's atmosphere will warm in response to this added carbon dioxide. The warming numbers most commonly advanced are created by climate computer models built almost entirely by scientists who believe in catastrophic global warming. The rate of warming forecast by these models depends on many assumptions and engineering to replicate a complex world in tractable terms, such as how water vapor and clouds will react to the direct heat added by carbon dioxide or the rate of heat uptake, or absorption, by the oceans.
We might forgive these modelers if their forecasts had not been so consistently and spectacularly wrong. From the beginning of climate modeling in the 1980s, these forecasts have, on average, always overstated the degree to which the Earth is warming compared with what we see in the real climate.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/...91611041331266
---Messrs. McNider and Christy are professors of atmospheric science at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and fellows of the American Meteorological Society. Mr. Christy was a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with former Vice President Al Gore. Mr. Christy was a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with Vice President Al Gore.
@)
You are a laughable dumb fuck.
Actual scientists
What is not a known fact is by how much the Earth's atmosphere will warm in response to this added carbon dioxide. The warming numbers most commonly advanced are created by climate computer models built almost entirely by scientists who believe in catastrophic global warming. The rate of warming forecast by these models depends on many assumptions and engineering to replicate a complex world in tractable terms, such as how water vapor and clouds will react to the direct heat added by carbon dioxide or the rate of heat uptake, or absorption, by the oceans.
We might forgive these modelers if their forecasts had not been so consistently and spectacularly wrong. From the beginning of climate modeling in the 1980s, these forecasts have, on average, always overstated the degree to which the Earth is warming compared with what we see in the real climate.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/...91611041331266
---Messrs. McNider and Christy are professors of atmospheric science at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and fellows of the American Meteorological Society. Mr. Christy was a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with former Vice President Al Gore. Mr. Christy was a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with Vice President Al Gore.
@)
You are a laughable dumb fuck.
I'm glad you found a 1%er but it's really not even an argument. Global warming is a fact and it's becoming more of a problem for our future. Only the retard bar disagrees.
