If you want people (outside of your isolated inner-social circle) to take you seriously, you have to be right and prove your competency every now then.
That's how things work in the real world - performance. You perform, you get rewarded. You don't perform, better find another line of work.
Alas, we all know how things work in the fantasy world of academia, a magic place where stupid unworkable ideas never die.
No wonder climate frauds and Keynesians have everything in common. And of course, being the lying clueless troll you are, you worship both.
"climate scientists" @)
If you want people (outside of your isolated inner-social circle) to take you seriously, you have to be right and prove your competency every now then.
That's how things work in the real world - performance. You perform, you get rewarded. You don't perform, better find another line of work.
Alas, we all know how things work in the fantasy world of academia.
No wonder climate frauds and Keynesians have everything in common. And of course, being the lying clueless troll you are, you would worship both.
"Climate scientists" @)
Yea, and Obama and climate scientists have performed better than you. Which is why I listen to them, lol.
'Sotoero' the community organizer is the least popular AND most incompetent individual EVER to set foot in the Oval Office - FACT
Obama polling lower than George W. Bush on competency
http://washingtonexaminer.com/obama-...rticle/2549877
Meanwhile, the Alaska troll lists the Kenyan as one of his top 5 historical figures! face)(*^%
This is mine... pure class! Educated, intelligent, honest, great father, great husband... just a legit human being. Can't say that for about 99% of this poly forum. Lots of sick people here that would vote for a guy that shows up in a hat and leather gloves to a political primary. Show some class every once in awhile.
ointer:
Actual scientists
What is not a known fact is by how much the Earth's atmosphere will warm in response to this added carbon dioxide. The warming numbers most commonly advanced are created by climate computer models built almost entirely by scientists who believe in catastrophic global warming. The rate of warming forecast by these models depends on many assumptions and engineering to replicate a complex world in tractable terms, such as how water vapor and clouds will react to the direct heat added by carbon dioxide or the rate of heat uptake, or absorption, by the oceans.
We might forgive these modelers if their forecasts had not been so consistently and spectacularly wrong. From the beginning of climate modeling in the 1980s, these forecasts have, on average, always overstated the degree to which the Earth is warming compared with what we see in the real climate.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/...91611041331266
---Messrs. McNider and Christy are professors of atmospheric science at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and fellows of the American Meteorological Society. Mr. Christy was a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with former Vice President Al Gore. Mr. Christy was a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with Vice President Al Gore.
LMFAO!
