This has already been debunked. Got to understand the difference between sea ice and land ice. There is not a single piece of data out there that shows the land ice is not decreasing in the antarctic which is far more significant than sea ice which comes and goes. Really hard to get land ice back. But that's way too complex for you, lol. You'll notice this isn't a blog.
Given the recent observed changes in atmospheric circulation and sea ice, it is highly likely that there have also been coupled changes in ocean characteristics. These are difficult to determine because of the scarcity of in situ data, although some changes have been observed. Jacobs et al. [2002] noted a freshening of the Ross Sea that they ascribed to increased precipitation and increased melting of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. This would likely favour a sea ice increase by enhancing the vertical stratification of the upper ocean and reducing the vertical heat flux from the warmer layers below [Zhang, 2007]. The observed changes in the surface wind field are consistent with an increase in wind stress curl, which would tend to accelerate the Ross Gyre [Wang and Meredith, 2008], again consistent with stronger ice export.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2009GL037524/full
They are only allowed plastic forks and have to wear eye wear when eating, lol. These dudes are such clowns. They literally think they understand everything about the world just by reading .com blogs. It's hilarious. There is pretty much not a single scientific organization that does or supports real research in the world that does not accept the fact that man made global warming is real. There are a lot of theories as to it's significance, but none related to it not being true. Man made global warming is a fact. There is not even a discussion in the educated community about it any more. You might get some oil and gas or mining companies that have scientists on their payroll to put out false information that they couldn't prove if they tried amongst their peers... but that's about it.
Well truthfully that's a lot because those companies have a shit load of money to spend on misinformation and a shitload to lose if people accepted global warming. Reminds me of the tobacco companies in the 70s, 80s, and 90s. They paid any scientist who was willing to defend the tobacco industry whatever they wanted. Basically questioning any findings with out even providing research disproving it. Just all talk. It's hilarious.
And it's also hilarious how they pick and choose what they want to believe scientists are telling them. The very same fucking scientists that are researching and telling them the sea ice in Antarctica has increased are the very same scientists telling them why it is happening. And they are definitely not finding that it's happening because global warming isn't happening.
Or like they'll believe scientists predicting their was an ice age millions of years ago, but nope... scientists would not understand that earth is warming and understand why it is so.
Just laughable how clownish these guys are.
Or like they'll believe scientists predicting their was an ice age millions of years ago, but nope... scientists would not understand that earth is warming and understand why it is so.
Just laughable how clownish these guys are.
You are not a part of the scientific community and most definitely the scientific community does not laugh at "climatologists". You're just making shit up again. Scientists definitely are not on your side. You basically have retard conservatives like yourself and paid for talking heads. 97% of people who actually research climate change disagree with you. I'm not surprised. Don't ever include the scientific community on your side, lol. You are as anti-science as it gets.
As always, you think you're laughing at everyone when in reality everyone is laughing at you.
“If you talk to real scientists who have no political interest, they will tell you there is nothing in global warming. It’s an industry which creates vast amounts of money for some people." - Former NASA Scientist Dr. Les Woodcock
Well, DUH!
Real scientists laugh at your "97%" cult (who get it wrong 97% of the time), and especially your mancrush "community organizer" demagogue when he says inane shit like, "the debate is over!"
@)
As always, you think you're laughing at everyone when in reality everyone is laughing at you.
“If you talk to real scientists who have no political interest, they will tell you there is nothing in global warming. It’s an industry which creates vast amounts of money for some people." - Former NASA Scientist Dr. Les Woodcock
Well, DUH!
Real scientists laugh at your "97%" cult (who get it wrong 97% of the time), and especially your mancrush "community organizer" demagogue when he says inane shit like, "the debate is over!"
@)
Oh wow!!! You found a scientist who says global warming is not real. I guess that means 97% of climatologists are wrong and he knows more than everyone else in the world.
Very solid "scientific method" you got going on, lmao!! Let me know when he writes a single research paper disproving global warming that is accepted by the scientific community. Until then, you are still stuck with people talking on blogs because they know they can't disprove it even if they tried.
“The temperature of the earth has been going up and down for millions of years, if there are extremes, it’s nothing to do with carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, it’s not permanent and it’s not caused by us. Global warming is nonsense.”
“Its absolutely stupid to blame floods on climate change.
“This is not the way science works. If you tell me that you have a theory there is a teapot in orbit between the earth and the moon, its not up to me to prove it does not exist, its up to you to provide the reproducible scientific evidence for your theory. Such evidence for the man-made climate change theory has not been forthcoming.”
-- Former NASA Scientist Dr. Les Woodcock
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Reproducible scientific evidence for your theory", aka the scientific method, aka REAL SCIENCE.
Oh nos! A real scientist adding some common sense to the debate.
Not looking very good for climate cultists.
"I listen to scientists!" - fratfraud
@)
“Its absolutely stupid to blame floods on climate change.
“This is not the way science works. If you tell me that you have a theory there is a teapot in orbit between the earth and the moon, its not up to me to prove it does not exist, its up to you to provide the reproducible scientific evidence for your theory. Such evidence for the man-made climate change theory has not been forthcoming.”
-- Former NASA Scientist Dr. Les Woodcock
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Reproducible scientific evidence for your theory", aka the scientific method, aka REAL SCIENCE.
Oh nos! A real scientist adding some common sense to the debate.
Not looking very good for climate cultists.
"I listen to scientists!" - fratfraud
@)
“The temperature of the earth has been going up and down for millions of years, if there are extremes, it’s nothing to do with carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, it’s not permanent and it’s not caused by us. Global warming is nonsense.”
“Its absolutely stupid to blame floods on climate change.
“This is not the way science works. If you tell me that you have a theory there is a teapot in orbit between the earth and the moon, its not up to me to prove it does not exist, its up to you to provide the reproducible scientific evidence for your theory. Such evidence for the man-made climate change theory has not been forthcoming.”
-- Former NASA Scientist Dr. Les Woodcock
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Reproducible scientific evidence for your theory", aka the scientific method, aka REAL SCIENCE.
Oh nos! A real scientist adding some common sense to the debate.
Not looking very good for climate cultists.
"I listen to scientists!" - fratfraud
@)
Wow, you found a scientist that says every other scientist is wrong. I guess we should believe him, lol and every other scientist throughout the world doesn't know what they are talking about. Very solid "scientific method" you got going on. Just laughably retarded.
Until you show me some real peer reviewed research that is accepted by the scientific community you are still going to be thought of as a retard. You literally do not understand how the real world works, lol. If any of these global warming deniers had proof that global warming didn't exist they would present it to the scientific community for review. And if they actually had real proof, they might even win a Nobel Prize. But they don't submit any research for review because they know the scientific community will reject their .com blogger nonsense.
It's hilarious how you don't understand how things work. And you claim Republicans use the "scientific method". Lmfao!
It's hilarious how you don't understand how things work. And you claim Republicans use the "scientific method". Lmfao!
I'm still not sold on it being man made. And yes the climate is changing. There have always been fluctuations in the weather and man hasn't had anything to do with it.
But to say it's man made and the only way to fix it is by spending money, that's where it loses it's argument with me. Once people start cashing in on a supposed catastrophe it loses all credibility.
But to say it's man made and the only way to fix it is by spending money, that's where it loses it's argument with me. Once people start cashing in on a supposed catastrophe it loses all credibility.
You wouldn't know the scientific method if Barry wrapped it around his cock and started bitch slapping you with it, the way an effeminate boy like you always fantasizes about - "Obama is the epitome of perfection!"
The Scientific Method:
What you post is opinionated crap from parasites making money off govt grants, not duplicable science.
No wonder you worship the 97% cult -- the 97% WRONG cult.
Let's see now...
Polar bear population falling? Wrong!
Increase in tornadoes and hurricanes? Wrong!
Glaciers melting? Wrong!
Seas rising? Wrong!
Cities flooding? Wrong! Wrong! Wrong!
Less snow - no more skiing? Wrong!
Tropical diseases? Wrong!
Species extinction? Wrong!
Uh, what about cow flatulence? face)(*^%
No wonder the scientific community wants nothing to do with the climate cultists.
"peer review is real science!"
"Obama Speaking The Truth about Global Warming to College Graduates!"
@)
