Those periods of time took thousands of years. Not 3 decades. There is no doubt all the shit we are putting in to the air has an effect on the environment and atmosphere. Not even a debate any more. And just saying weather can change on it's own does not mean man can't change weather also.
White House looks to regulate cow flatulence as part of climate agenda
As part of its plan to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, the Obama administration is targeting the dairy industry to reduce methane emissions in their operations.
This comes despite falling methane emission levels across the economy since 1990.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/28/w...ence-as-part-of-climate-agenda/#ixzz35oF4x5NF
What more can one possibly say about these idiots?
This is your unhinged party and radical 'president', fratfraud.
Stand proud!
:neenee:
As part of its plan to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, the Obama administration is targeting the dairy industry to reduce methane emissions in their operations.
This comes despite falling methane emission levels across the economy since 1990.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/28/w...ence-as-part-of-climate-agenda/#ixzz35oF4x5NF
What more can one possibly say about these idiots?
This is your unhinged party and radical 'president', fratfraud.
Stand proud!
:neenee:
Of course it's racist. It's a code word that Connservative Politicians use to try and appear non racist, while giving a shout out to their racist supporters that they're with you. http://www.theroot.com/articles/politics/2014/03/_racial_code_words_8_term_politicians_love.html
To understand how outright racist language has gone underground but is working as hard as ever to drum up support for conservative policies, the author says, you just have to look at this list of sneaky code words and phrases that politicians throughout history have loved, and what they really mean:
1. 'Inner City'
Ryan's statement, which he later said he regretted, is a perfect example of the way public expressions of racism have evolved, says López. "You can't publicly say black people don't like to work, but you can say there's an inner-city culture in which generations of people don't value work." The goal here, he says, isn't to demonize minorities—far from it—but to demonize a government that helps the middle class (and if the people Americans have historically associated with inner cities have to be used in the process, so be it).
Of course it's racist. I can't even imagine how anyone has the decency to say it's not racist. He's using the white vote figures as the working class against the "inner city" vote. It's as racist as it gets. But you are right, they have learned that they can't be direct in their racism. Cowards.
if the sun has a surge in solar flares, things will get really really hot and all them there man made global warming hypocrites will be cranking up their energy consuming air conditioners
and heaven forbid should the sun's solar flares ever stop, I guess libtard nation will think we can warm up our freezing planet simply by driving more. I just think we'd be really fucked, especially since we're unprepared after wasting all out time and money naively believing we can control the climate.
it's all beginning to remind me of an Indian rain dance
and heaven forbid should the sun's solar flares ever stop, I guess libtard nation will think we can warm up our freezing planet simply by driving more. I just think we'd be really fucked, especially since we're unprepared after wasting all out time and money naively believing we can control the climate.
it's all beginning to remind me of an Indian rain dance
I know what we need to do to save our planet, a libtard climate preservation dance
that oughta do it
you can thank me for saving the planet later
after all, "I'm a climate change expert". My really smart accounting professor once told me why it's warmer nearer to the equator.
that oughta do it
you can thank me for saving the planet later
after all, "I'm a climate change expert". My really smart accounting professor once told me why it's warmer nearer to the equator.
yes, but the bottom line, the earth's historical temperatures and the earth's historical pattern of climate change simply doesn't fit into that theory. As a matter of fact, with the earth's population exploding and the consumption of energy worldwide exploding your theory can only conclude that the earth's temperatures are doing likewise, and that's not happening. Why is that?
These are facts. In the last twenty years population has doubled and energy consumption has doubled, but the temperatures have not increased? Why should I believe a theory that's been proven wrong by reality?
Can you tell me why mankind should not be concerned about the next 70,000 year cycle of global cooling that scheduled to begin relatively soon? from today to 3,000 years from today based on a two billion year cycle?
