Russ and that Kid on Pittsburgh along with lang.. talk about the stars aligning against us? I didn't like the way they handled the 4th.. should have been a walk to the mound from someone to let the kid regroup. I dont think he exhaled to relax until he gave up the GS, then he gets em to ground out to get out of the inning...
absolutely. you could see it in his body language that he just needed a bit of a breather. to hang that ball in that count was unforgivable but it looked like it calmed him down to have the bases cleared and down 4 runs. i guess it's just the gambling aspect but I've been talking about giants unders vs LHP all season and in a 1-game series you gotta be using Liriano knowing this. Giants, since Mid-April, avg 3.3 rpg vs LH starters...3 point freaking 3 in 55 games. this year vs RHP they're 4.4 rpg in 103 starts. that's huge to have a 1 rpg differential and when you have Liriano who is not only a lefty but won both of his playoff games last year he had to be the starter.
anyway, moving on....
i adjusted the system with some secret nuclear formulas (decreased the BA needed, added opponent starter WHIP component) and dropped the need for a specific line component so i don't have to sit here hitting F5 like some retard each night. Interestingly BOTH giants and nationals cancel each other out in both G1 and G2 (pretty bizarre) and the Cardinals pop for both G1 and G2 as a play against....
only one other time in 6 years has this system have a single game fit both teams (like SF/WAS g1&2) so dropping that game (liriano beat cueto last year) playing against the team on the left has brought a 39-17 SU record (22-12 +108.8% for favorites / 17-5 +170.8% dogs). so might just be best to wait for another dog to fit like KC and PIT or just play all dogs that pop up even if they get canceled in same game.
So won't be anything tonight anyway...will make some decisions on the next few days but I'm leaning toward playing the favs when they show (kershaw, greinke) and dogs even if canceled (peavy, hudson). choices, choices....
tS(hits) / tS(at bats) <= 0.25480 and playoffs > 0 and ....
|
---|
SU: | 18-40 (-0.79, 31.0%)
| avg line: 110.8 / -122.6 | on / against: -$2,325 / +$2,022 | ROI: -35.5% / +26.6% | | |
---|
RL: | 24-34 (-0.33, 41.4%) | avg line: -116.0 / 101.6 | on / against: -$1,747 / +$1,446 | ROI: -22.3% / +20.1% | | |
---|
OU: | 26-29-3 (-0.09, 47.3%) | avg total: 7.5 | over / under: -$590 / +$75 | ROI: -9.4% / +1.2% | | |
---|
<tbody>
</tbody> |
| Runs | Hits | Errors | Walks | Strike Outs | Ground Balls | Fly Balls | Team LOB |
---|
Team | 3.3 | 7.7 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 9.2 | 9.6 | 5.5 | 6.7 |
---|
Opp | 4.1 | 8.0 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 7.7 | 8.9 | 5.5 | 6.4 |
---|
<tbody>
</tbody> |
Date | Link | Day | Site | Team | Starter | Opp | Starter | Final | SUm | W/L | OUm | O/U | Hits | Errors | BL | Line | Total | Innings |
---|
Oct 04, 2014 | | Sat | away | Cardinals | Lance Lynn - R | Dodgers | Zack Greinke - R | | | | | | | | | | | | Oct 04, 2014 | | Sat | home | Nationals | Tanner Roark - R | Giants | Tim Hudson - R | | | | | | | | | | | | Oct 04, 2014 | | Sat | away | Giants | Tim Hudson - R | Nationals | Tanner Roark - R | | | | | | | | | | | | Oct 03, 2014 | | Fri | away | Cardinals | Adam Wainwright - R | Dodgers | Clayton Kershaw - L | | | | | | | | | 180 | 5.5 | | Oct 03, 2014 | | Fri | home | Nationals | Stephen Strasburg - R | Giants | Jake Peavy - R | | | | | | | | | -175 | 6.5 | | Oct 03, 2014 | | Fri | away | Giants | Jake Peavy - R | Nationals | Stephen Strasburg - R | | | | | | | | | 165 | 6.5 | | Oct 01, 2014 | box | Wed | away | Giants | Madison Bumgarner - L | Pirates | Edinson Volquez - R | 8-0 | 8 | W | 1.5 | O | 11-4 | 2-0 | 8-0 | -111 | 6.5 | 9 | Sep 30, 2014 | box | Tue | away | Athletics | Jon Lester - L | Royals | James Shields - R | 8-9 | -1 | L | 10.5 | O | 13-15 | 0-0 | 4-1 | -107 | 6.5 | 10 |
<caption>
</caption><thead>
</thead><tbody role="alert">
</tbody>
|
<tbody>
</tbody>