Malcolm Butler

Search
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
I was sent about 7 clips of training camp footage this year of my friend Mike who was with the Titans earlier in the year. Of 1 on 1s against corners. Mike was frying them all. And who was the most frequent victim? Malcom butler. My friend had to get ankle surgery and couldn’t play this year but Butler was getting dusted by a dude with torn ligaments in his ankle. And Malcolm butler was suppose to be the savior. He isn’t that good. He made one play in a super bowl, and the sheep think he was going to do it again lmfao
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
Someone actually said in this thread that Eric Rowe was 1 of the Pats best defensive players last year?

I don’t even remember that but that’s crazy.


He was lmao. Who cares though. I never said Eric Rowe was going to single handedly change the outcome of a Super Bowl. This guy Malcolm butler was never that great. He had one good year after making one play.

Is josh Norman that great? People crown these players for no reason. One year.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
Guys suck when switching teams all the time in the nfl based on a variety of reasons.

He was a lot better player w/ the Pats than the guys they had out there replacing him that day. This concept is very, very easy to understand.

And nah to the Rowe thing, actually surprised I didn’t have a bigger reaction to that. One of the more off the wall statements I’ve heard.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
Guys suck when switching teams all the time in the nfl based on a variety of reasons.

He was a lot better player w/ the Pats than the guys they had out there replacing him that day. This concept is very, very easy to understand.

And nah to the Rowe thing, actually surprised I didn’t have a bigger reaction to that. One of the more off the wall statements I’ve heard.



He has played for two teams. He had one good year with the patriots. Last year he was awful. The year before that he was much better. He simply isn’t as good as people think. If he was so good why wasn’t he drafted? The Patriots make a lot of players that aren’t special, good.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
Josh Norman? Yeah he was pretty good. Top 5-10 CB in his prime. Solid now.


Lol solid now. Bahahahhaah right. He’s average at absolute best as a cover corner.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
He had about 2.5 good years for NE out of the 3 he started from 2015-2017.

And no one said the Pats were gonna shutdown the Eagles If he played. Said if he out there instead of his backup they wouldnt have given up 570 yards and 41 points.

Why is is this one so tough for people? I never understood that. Do they feel like it isn’t giving the Eagles credit for winning or something?
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
He had about 2.5 good years for NE out of the 3 he started from 2015-2017.

And no one said the Pats were gonna shutdown the Eagles If he played. Said if he out there instead of his backup they wouldnt have given up 570 yards and 41 points.

Why is is this one so tough for people? I never understood that. Do they feel like it isn’t giving the Eagles credit for winning or something?



they might have given up more with what I have seen he has left. Obviously he didn’t prepare for the super bowl appropriately
 

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
31,503
Tokens
Maybe he was sauced out the night before, I dunno. But he was a good player for NE besides the first 5-6 games of last year. Much better than his backup(s)

Not the 188th rated CB via pro football focus like Eric Rowe.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,420
Tokens
He had about 2.5 good years for NE out of the 3 he started from 2015-2017.

And no one said the Pats were gonna shutdown the Eagles If he played. Said if he out there instead of his backup they wouldnt have given up 570 yards and 41 points.

Why is is this one so tough for people? I never understood that. Do they feel like it isn’t giving the Eagles credit for winning or something?


You're dealing with someone who is "all or nothing."

No one argues that Malcolm Butler would've made the Eagles only have 200 total yards of offense or something like that. But in a tight game, having your best corner in there is a variable that absolutely could've changed the outcome of the Super Bowl.

That's just common sense. Can't argue that.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
You're dealing with someone who is "all or nothing."

No one argues that Malcolm Butler would've made the Eagles only have 200 total yards of offense or something like that. But in a tight game, having your best corner in there is a variable that absolutely could've changed the outcome of the Super Bowl.

That's just common sense. Can't argue that.



What the fuck did you say about me? Your common sense is horse shit. When you think to open your mouth about me, don’t. Pussy bitch always taking shots because you’re an irrelevant loser. The guy was on the serious decline and had his worst year with the Patriots and then they got rid of him. You think forreal they got rid of him after the super bowl because he got high and missed a team meeting or was late? Lmao. They got rid of him because that’s how quick it takes for you to lose a step at cornerback in this league.

Anyone who says Malcolm butler would have changed the outcome you will be jotted down in my book of retards. Please, keep revealing yourselfs for me. Thank you. Of course Malcolm butler is going to say he would have changed the outcome lmfaooooooo. That’s what competitors say. Do you compete at anything besides forum respect you will never receive?
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,420
Tokens
The Eagles didn't have much margin for error. One variable can absolutely sway the outcome of a tightly-contested game. No one can rationally dispute that.

Your small brain is interpreting that argument as , "The Patriots would've absolutely shut down the Eagles offense if Butler played!" Literally no one said that...

But okay, go with your "fate" argument to say that the Patriots had absolutely no shot to beat the Eagles. That makes way more sense.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
The Eagles didn't have much margin for error. One variable can absolutely sway the outcome of a tightly-contested game. No one can rationally dispute that.

Your small brain is interpreting that argument as , "The Patriots would've absolutely shut down the Eagles offense if Butler played!" Literally no one said that...

But okay, go with your "fate" argument to say that the Patriots had absolutely no shot to beat the Eagles. That makes way more sense.


They didn’t have much margin for error he says lmao. So Malcom butler was going to stop Zach Ertz on that 4th and 1? Lmao no.



Then why are you arguing if you don’t think butler could have shut anyone down? If he doesn’t shut anyone down then it is the same outcome. Wow they missed some tackles. Malcom butler isn’t going to matchup well with Algohor. He’s just not. I wish he did play honestly. So funny this is what the patriots fans hold onto. The patriot backers. Your boy took that fat L -200 on the ML. Lmfao.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,420
Tokens
They didn’t have much margin for error he says lmao. So Malcom butler was going to stop Zach Ertz on that 4th and 1? Lmao no.



Then why are you arguing if you don’t think butler could have shut anyone down? If he doesn’t shut anyone down then it is the same outcome. Wow they missed some tackles. Malcom butler isn’t going to matchup well with Algohor. He’s just not. I wish he did play honestly. So funny this is what the patriots fans hold onto. The patriot backers. Your boy took that fat L -200 on the ML. Lmfao.


I'm not a Patriots fan; just an objective observer. A few plays here and there, as well as the absence of the distraction the the Butler situation probably had on the defense, definitely COULD have had an impact on the outcome of a very tightly contested game.

You're acting like the Eagles were blowing the Patriots out of the water.

You also argued that "fate" was the main reason the Eagles won, and that "fate" applies in the NFL and not in the NBA.

But yeah, you're not retarded or anything.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
I'm not a Patriots fan; just an objective observer. A few plays here and there, as well as the absence of the distraction the the Butler situation probably had on the defense, definitely COULD have had an impact on the outcome of a very tightly contested game.

You're acting like the Eagles were blowing the Patriots out of the water.

You also argued that "fate" was the main reason the Eagles won, and that "fate" applies in the NFL and not in the NBA.

But yeah, you're not retarded or anything.


Fate is everywhere. Kind of like how you will never amount to anything here. Fate.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2007
Messages
5,738
Tokens
Fate is everywhere. Kind of like how you will never amount to anything here. Fate.
Mob my friend you nailed him there bud. He wont no matter how hard he tries. The little guy has been taking a beating here lately in every thread he steps in, its sad.
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
47,959
Tokens
Butler would have made a difference in a game that needed just a stop here or there to alter the outcome. The Eagles were running like crazy once they got into the Patriot backfield. One of Butler's often overlooked values is that he is a sure tackler, maybe the best tackler on that Patriot team.

He WAS Missed.
 

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2017
Messages
16,420
Tokens
Butler would have made a difference in a game that needed just a stop here or there to alter the outcome. The Eagles were running like crazy once they got into the Patriot backfield. One of Butler's often overlooked values is that he is a sure tackler, maybe the best tackler on that Patriot team.

He WAS Missed.



Nah man, common sense and logical reason don’t fly in Mob arguments. Fate was the reason the Eagles won, and the football players on the field weren’t!
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
28,144
Tokens
Nah man, common sense and logical reason don’t fly in Mob arguments. Fate was the reason the Eagles won, and the football players on the field weren’t!


Youre clueless. What do you think a patriot fan is going to say? They are use to super bowls. There has to be some sort of logic of why Belicheks defense got that lit up. So it has to be one player was the reason it has to be because Malcolm butler decided to go to a concert instead of prepare is the reason a belicheks coaches defense got destroyed. That has to be the reason, right?


It was a close game because Tom Brady was on the other side of the ball. You know what you need to do? You need to stop thinking about me. Stop talking about me. Stop subliminally throwing shots at me. You’re a punk. A bitch. Nobody likes you. Keep my name out of your mouth and stop commenting about me pussyboy
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,546
Messages
13,534,502
Members
100,373
Latest member
esmefurnishings3
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com