No, not at all. UCONN has a nice little run going. I wouldn't consider the three teams they've beat any sort of powerhouse teams or anything. I think Villanova was the worst of the #2 seeds and didn't even deserve a #2 seed but that's a different discussion. Iowa St. was missing arguably their best player due to injury.
Take nothing away from UCONN though. They are in the Great 8. There's no way they should've beaten St. Joe's but it is what it is.
It still doesn't change what we've talked about in 5 pages of this thread. Lousiville was overrated and seeded properly. They weren't as good as some guys in this thread made them out to be.
I'm back..got in at 2 am from the east regional and had to go to work today..louisville had that game and blew it..just like va in our game...
Louisville maybe on the side line..but they got alot further than duke, higher than nova, kansas creighton and syracuse and just as far as #1 va and arizona
so get to reality..i didn' saythey desrved being #1 i just said # 4 was bullshit
i do admit i did severly under estimate wiscosin
Louisville maybe on the side line..but they got alot further than duke, higher than nova, kansas creighton and syracuse and just as far as #1 va and arizona
so get to reality..i didn' saythey desrved being #1 i just said # 4 was bullshit
i do admit i did severly under estimate wiscosin
Get to reality LOLOLOLOL.
The reality is a team you thought should've been higher than a 4 seed lost in the Sweet 16 to an 8 seed. The reality is you and the other guy overestimated Louisville and thought they were better than they really were.
That's the reality if we're being honest. The sooner you just admit that point, the better off you'll be.
And now that they've lost in the Sweet 16 to an 8 seed, were they still deserving of a higher seed in your opinion?
Yes..i also said mich st got screwed...no comment on that?..they could lose to a seven seed...because in "honesty"..the only team that went any "further" than them that i suggested they should replace is wiconsin ..if you saw my other thread so saw in one pool i have michigan winning the midwest..really just complained about duke, villanova, and wisconsin...try reading red elephants post 12 and also post #27..
Louisville barely lost to a team that shot their free throws 15% better than norm and they shot 10 percent worse.if you told me that and that russ smith a 70% shooter from the line would miss 6 and shoot 40% and a 38 % shooter from 3 point line would shot 1-7..i would have not made the thread
other than that i know you're never wrong..so i'll just leave it at that..going to the regional final..enjoy whatever your doing
Louisville barely lost to a team that shot their free throws 15% better than norm and they shot 10 percent worse.if you told me that and that russ smith a 70% shooter from the line would miss 6 and shoot 40% and a 38 % shooter from 3 point line would shot 1-7..i would have not made the thread
other than that i know you're never wrong..so i'll just leave it at that..going to the regional final..enjoy whatever your doing
Dude, I've been there before. It hurts deep down inside to say "ya know, I was wrong and it was proven that I was wrong." I know it's hard to say but nobody is going to think less of you.
A) Nobody cares what Syracuse did. Nobody cares what Kansas did. That's not the point of this entire tread. The point is and you emphasized it with exclamation points and caps and all sorts of animation that Louisville was seeded way too low. it has nothing to do with anything else. I told you they play in a shit conference and didn't beat anyone this year and were seeded right where they should be. You were adamant they were better than a #4. It was proven that they were not better than a #4. It happened on the court.
B) It doesn't matter how they lost or why. They lost. If they were better than a #4, then they would've beaten UK but they didn't. Doesn't matter why. Don't make excuses for them.
I'm never wrong? Wrong all the time but I know for certain I'm not wrong in regards to this thread and it was proven on the court. At least you have the nerve to come back in and discuss whereas the other guy just ran off. Even though you're 100% incorrect, I'll give you credit for being a man about it.
JUST GOT FROM A GREAT GAME.BUT THAT IS THE POINT OF THE THREAD...THEY OUTPEFORMED 5 OF THE TEAMS SEEDED 2 AND 3 ,,AND THUS "SHOULD" HAVE BEEN SEEDED HIGHER THAN THOSE JOKES ALL OF WHICH HAD LOST GOING INTO THE SEEDINGS. LOUISVILLE WAS IN THE TOP 10 OF EVERY SINGLE POLL GOING INTO THE SEEDINGS AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN SEEDED ACCORDINGLY..THE OTHER 2 ..ISU LOST IN THE SAME ROUND AS LOUISVILLE AND WICONSIN MADE THE FINAL 4 AND I WAS 100% WRONG ABOUT THEM
I had no issue with any of the #1seeds or Michigan..but I guess in "EN FUEGOESE" Virginia and Wich st didn't deserve their rankings because they didn't make the FINAL 4...UPSETS HAPPEN..That doesn't mean that those teams were misseeded.
Duke lost a "home" game to Mercer in the first round..so where would you have them seeded ?
also you gave zero credit to a UConn team that shut down MIch st and went to the final 4..my pools are dead because zona lost ..so on to baseball
I'M SURE OVER 80% OF THE PEOPLE READING THIS THREAD ..AGREE WITH ME.... YOUR ENTITLED TO YOUR OPINION
I had no issue with any of the #1seeds or Michigan..but I guess in "EN FUEGOESE" Virginia and Wich st didn't deserve their rankings because they didn't make the FINAL 4...UPSETS HAPPEN..That doesn't mean that those teams were misseeded.
Duke lost a "home" game to Mercer in the first round..so where would you have them seeded ?
also you gave zero credit to a UConn team that shut down MIch st and went to the final 4..my pools are dead because zona lost ..so on to baseball
I'M SURE OVER 80% OF THE PEOPLE READING THIS THREAD ..AGREE WITH ME.... YOUR ENTITLED TO YOUR OPINION
