Line reading 101

[letsgohoosiers]

hoosiers - all these plays you're listing (or matchups)..are they qualifying under rule #1? or what

1 and 2... those are the one's I play on.

 

[ZJP6050]

also, does cleveland classify under rule #4??

06/06 04:18 PM +114 -124
06/06 07:21 PM +112 -122
06/07 09:39 AM +113 -123
06/07 09:40 AM +108 -118
06/07 11:26 AM +105 -115
06/07 11:30 AM +101 -111
06/07 12:03 PM +104 -114


opened at +114 and never got back there?

 

[ZJP6050]

cubbies bases loaded no outs...let's go!

 

[ZJP6050]

1 and 2... those are the one's I play on.

which ones qualified under #2? that's the one i've flirted with least

 

[ZJP6050]

toronto is looking like it should've been the play after all..

 

[ZJP6050]

wow, cubs really fucked this one up

 

[1968]

rockies are a rule #1 play

match +123
wager street +125

 

[letsgohoosiers]

I see COL (WagerStreet) and CLE (eHorseX) for 2:00 right now

 

[ZJP6050]

rockies are a rule #1 play

are you seeing cleveland as rule #1 play as well? and rule #3?

 

[ZJP6050]

gonna play cleve instead of colo just based on the ehorsex record

 

[himeshforex]

cleveland and colorado providing plays ,,,,,

 

[1968]

matchbook +123 rockies
betjamaica +124 rockies
wager street +125 rockies

 

[Paddywack]

Does anyone have an acct at EHorse?

 

[willb3rd]

took Cle

waiting a few more minutes on Col as matchbook is creeping it's line up

 

[1968]

crap, just noticed cardinals dont go off for another 15

 

[1968]

Does anyone have an acct at EHorse?

i dont but will be looking into it.

 

[ZJP6050]

detroit showing promise in the 3rd

 

[1968]

detroit showing promise in the 3rd

well they were, 2 on no outs, now 2 on, 2 outs.

 

[knighty]

What are the plays for 4 pm(est)?

 

[1968]

there we go tigers!