Line reading 101

Search

New member
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
3,729
Tokens
nats are so close to being a play under rule #1, 1 more
 

New member
Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Messages
1,421
Tokens
TEX +163 at bet365
<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR title="Post 6739670" vAlign=top><TD class=alt2 align=middle width=125></TD><TD class=alt1>Would Washington be a Play according 2 rule #1

Wager street they are +110 and wager line they are +105 d1g1t:ohno: </TD></TR><TR><TD class=thead colSpan=2>06-07-2009 01:25 PM</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 

New member
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
3,729
Tokens
yea thats why im leary of the 1 cent qualifiers. i like to see 2-3 centers like milwaukee yesterday.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
3,131
Tokens
LAA
DET eHorseX

TAM Bodog
NYY

KC 5Dimes ABCIslands bet365 eHorseX
TOR

CUB All (Matchbook line)
CIN

MIL
ATL eHorseX

NYM eHorseX
WAS WagerStreet

TEX
BOS
 

I'd rather be Kayak fishing
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
6,411
Tokens
Cubbies survive a potentially bad inning with only one run.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2008
Messages
8,987
Tokens
hoosiers - all these plays you're listing (or matchups)..are they qualifying under rule #1? or what
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,121,106
Messages
13,591,052
Members
101,054
Latest member
tb813
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com