Line reading 101

[Funnyb25]

From looking at LGH's early breakdown on the games today; Toronto, Oakland, and Arizona were the strongest plays today. Toronto bombed out, but Oakland looks good, and Arizona just started.

dont forget about the rockies.... they were definitely a play by rule 3... cash money...

 

[Paddywack]

dont forget about the rockies.... they were definitely a play by rule 3... cash money...

The 3 I posted above met all the rules.

 

[Funnyb25]

The 3 I posted above met all the rules.

i agree. those 3 were plays... but so were the ROCKIESSSSS!!!:cripwalk:

 

[JimmyJet]

How about Washington....qualifies under Rule # 1 and easy winner 7-1 over the Mets

 

[Funnyb25]

How about Washington....qualifies under Rule # 1 and easy winner 7-1 over the Mets

Nationals as well, not under rule 1 tho.... they were rule 4.....

 

[1968]

congrats all of you on arizona, f-me for falling for the padres.

 

[letsgohoosiers]

Glad to see some of you starting to "get it"

Here was the reads on 6-6.

 

[1968]

did you make those yellow box outlines?

 

[Funnyb25]

man... i missed a couple according to rule #1... this rule is the toughest one for me.. the matchbook lines change constantly, what time is this snap shot from... i never caught the bad line on cubs and marlins..... can ya let me know what time that snapshot was from..

thanks

 

[1968]

yea, and he is missing the rule #1 play on the brewers, jamaica was +165 right before first pitch

 

[JimmyJet]

Was Washington a play based on Rulw #4 as the line moved quite a bit from opening?

 

[Funnyb25]

when was the snapshot of those lines taken???

 

[JimmyJet]

Have looked at the overnight lines and see many where Matchbook does not have the best line....but thinking too early to qualify as Rule 1 plays....is that correct?

 

[1968]

Was Washington a play based on Rulw #4 as the line moved quite a bit from opening?

yes!:toast:

 

[1968]

Have looked at the overnight lines and see many where Matchbook does not have the best line....but thinking too early to qualify as Rule 1 plays....is that correct?

yes, I tend to wait right before pitch for rule #1's

 

[letsgohoosiers]

Have looked at the overnight lines and see many where Matchbook does not have the best line....but thinking too early to qualify as Rule 1 plays....is that correct?

Yes, in terms of identifying Arbitrage winners, you only look right before the game (rules 1 and 2).

 

[jevers77]

when was the snapshot of those lines taken???

That was taken when he posted.

 

[ZJP6050]

the rules followed through greatly tonight. plays i registered were washington, oakland (currently up 9-0) and still waiting on arizona, who is up 2-0. i understand colorado would've been a play too (however i didn't play them, won 10-1)

 

[Hip2Bsq]

I missed some winners....
I did play the,

Natinals W
Rockies W
Tigers W (from a different system)
Cubs L
D'Backs P'ing

 

[1968]

the rules followed through greatly tonight. plays i registered were washington, oakland (currently up 9-0) and still waiting on arizona, who is up 2-0. i understand colorado would've been a play too (however i didn't play them, won 10-1)

Padres was the play under rule #1.