Line reading 101

[jevers77]

On the 1st day he used wager street for 2 plays and wsex was also at +190. But yes the NYY fit 2 rules.

I see Clev rule 3 and Min rule 3 and 4.

Now it shows Sea under rule 1

 

[1968]

Now it shows Sea under rule 1

matchbook has seattle +100, who has a better line?

 

[jevers77]

matchbook has seattle +100, who has a better line?

betjamaica +101

 

[1968]

nice, good eye.

 

[DoggieInvestor]

so basically this a thread where the OP will pop in say when this system has winning days, but nothing when it loses, all the while no picks are posted

got it.

 

[Funnyb25]

so basically this a thread where the OP will pop in say when this system has winning days, but nothing when it loses, all the while no picks are posted

got it.

ya its pretty sad.... but he is on something else... just posting his rules on plays and we have to figure it all out.. he doesnt confirm anything when we ask.....

 

[goblue12]

Oh no I dont go there lol nice try though.

You know Im suprised to see scUM schedule TWO MAC teams this year for football, after they never made it past Toledo....


Enjoy little wolvie

ps- congrats making March Madness this year, you guys going to hang up a banner saying round of 32?

Good for you.

State needs all the fans they can get who are non-alums / students.

I'm sure whatever undergraduate education that you got was top notch.

 

[Funnyb25]

Rangers +199 at matchbook +201 at pinnacle.... if anyone uses pinnacle the rangers would qualify under rule 1... FYI...

 

[goblue12]

so basically this a thread where the OP will pop in say when this system has winning days, but nothing when it loses, all the while no picks are posted

got it.

Perhaps he is nocturnal?

arty:

 

[JimmyJet]

so basically this a thread where the OP will pop in say when this system has winning days, but nothing when it loses, all the while no picks are posted

got it.

If you read the thread, than you would know this is for education of us on how to read lines and with the rules supplied give us another factor to consider with our own selections. He did not start this thread to give out picks but to educate us on how to read lines and movement to supplement our own handicapping and I for one am very grateful for his sharing this information....thanks Hossier.

 

[JimmyJet]

hoosiers*

 

[DoggieInvestor]

if he wanted to educated then he would say which teams lost, not just the ones who won........ why say "you would have gone 6-0" in one post but never saw a "would have gone 0-3" or whatever?

 

[1968]

padres fit rule #1

 

[Funnyb25]

padres fit rule #1

i wouldnt take the padres....

 

[1968]

Yea, but gotta ride the #1 rule, it did me well on the brewers and KC today, hopefully it can help me go 3-0, good luck

 

[Funnyb25]

you too

 

[1968]

lol and just as i post that it moves back up. Oh well, may sit this one out.

 

[1968]

wow! late hit on Padres down to +116, padres for me.

 

[Funnyb25]

dbacks for me... if you look at my thread, the padres are the play...

good luck

 

[Paddywack]

From looking at LGH's early breakdown on the games today; Toronto, Oakland, and Arizona were the strongest plays today. Toronto bombed out, but Oakland looks good, and Arizona just started.