Still very early days on this one.
I want to see at least 100 plays before I can tell that maybe I'm into something seriously good, or it's just a fluke run of results (good luck can play major part in outcomes 15 days in row no problem, just to be followed by bad luck playing major part for 15 days in row. Over 100 picks or in more than 20 days the importance of luck is quickly fading if looking at the record.)
Sunday's Results
2 u - NY Mets -151 = 5-1, Won 2 u
2 u - Chi. White Sox -152 = 4-5, Lost 3.04 u
2 u - Cleveland -1 -164 = 5-4, Pushed
2 u - Detroit +125 = 7-0, Won 2 u
2 u - Chi. Cubs -1 -128 = 4-6, Lost 2.56 u
Record of the day: 2 W - 2 L - 1 P / -1.6 u
Overall record: 25 W - 14 L - 3 P / +22.145 u
2 u - NY Mets -151 = 5-1, Won 2 u
2 u - Chi. White Sox -152 = 4-5, Lost 3.04 u
2 u - Cleveland -1 -164 = 5-4, Pushed
2 u - Detroit +125 = 7-0, Won 2 u
2 u - Chi. Cubs -1 -128 = 4-6, Lost 2.56 u
Record of the day: 2 W - 2 L - 1 P / -1.6 u
Overall record: 25 W - 14 L - 3 P / +22.145 u
Adding:
2.4 u - LA Dodgers -1 -137 / 7:05 PM
2.4 u - Boston -120 / 7:05 PM
2.4 u - Tampa Bay -1 -143 / 7:10 PM
2.4 u - Cleveland -1 -130 / 7:10 PM
2.4 u - Atlanta +123 / 7:10 PM
2.4 u - Texas -120 / 8:05 PM
2.4 u - Houston -1 -123 / 8:10 PM
2.4 u - Pittsburgh -105 / 10:15 PM
----------------------------
Lots of big favs today, which I will never play moneyline.
With so many -1 runlines, I would not be surprised to get 2 pushes.
2.4 u - LA Dodgers -1 -137 / 7:05 PM
2.4 u - Boston -120 / 7:05 PM
2.4 u - Tampa Bay -1 -143 / 7:10 PM
2.4 u - Cleveland -1 -130 / 7:10 PM
2.4 u - Atlanta +123 / 7:10 PM
2.4 u - Texas -120 / 8:05 PM
2.4 u - Houston -1 -123 / 8:10 PM
2.4 u - Pittsburgh -105 / 10:15 PM
----------------------------
Lots of big favs today, which I will never play moneyline.
With so many -1 runlines, I would not be surprised to get 2 pushes.
Tuesday's Results
3 u - Chi. Cubs -1 -158 = 4-0, Won 3 u
2.4 u - LA Dodgers -1 -137 = 15-5, Won 2.4 u
2.4 u - Boston -120 = 5-3, Won 2.4 u
2.4 u - Tampa Bay -1 -143 = 15-1, Won 2.4 u
2.4 u - Cleveland -1 -130 = 3-1, Won 2.4 u
2.4 u - Atlanta +123 = 2-4, Lost 1.951 u
2.4 u - Texas -120 = 5-4, Won 2.4 u
2.4 u - Houston -1 -123 = 5-8, Lost 2.952 u
2.4 u - Pittsburgh -105 = 4-3, Won 2.4 u
Record of the day: 7 W - 2 L / +12.497 u
Overall record: 32 W - 17 L - 3 P / +31.882 u
-------------------------------
Turned out to be a great day...
3 u - Chi. Cubs -1 -158 = 4-0, Won 3 u
2.4 u - LA Dodgers -1 -137 = 15-5, Won 2.4 u
2.4 u - Boston -120 = 5-3, Won 2.4 u
2.4 u - Tampa Bay -1 -143 = 15-1, Won 2.4 u
2.4 u - Cleveland -1 -130 = 3-1, Won 2.4 u
2.4 u - Atlanta +123 = 2-4, Lost 1.951 u
2.4 u - Texas -120 = 5-4, Won 2.4 u
2.4 u - Houston -1 -123 = 5-8, Lost 2.952 u
2.4 u - Pittsburgh -105 = 4-3, Won 2.4 u
Record of the day: 7 W - 2 L / +12.497 u
Overall record: 32 W - 17 L - 3 P / +31.882 u
-------------------------------
Turned out to be a great day...
If anyone thinks to follow these plays, please keep in mind that I blindly follow all the picks which my PC spits out.
I only decide if I play sometimes the -1 or the -1.5 RL on some big favs, and of course the units to be wagered for the "win" target.
I play all these picks "action".
Also it's still very early days, as I already pointed out in another post.
I have seen countless handicapping systems* I tried going great even for 3-4 weeks, just to have some horrible runs in the next 2 weeks or so. (Though it seems to me that the real key here will be to use the right money management,)
* It can be debated that this is a system or not, because it is not any kind of chase.
Just always exactly the same handicapping criteria based on pure statistical data are considered to make the decision.
Forget that I feed into the software the data about the last 5 games played by each team (including projected starting pitchers) to get these picks.
I only decide if I play sometimes the -1 or the -1.5 RL on some big favs, and of course the units to be wagered for the "win" target.
I play all these picks "action".
Also it's still very early days, as I already pointed out in another post.
I have seen countless handicapping systems* I tried going great even for 3-4 weeks, just to have some horrible runs in the next 2 weeks or so. (Though it seems to me that the real key here will be to use the right money management,)
* It can be debated that this is a system or not, because it is not any kind of chase.
Just always exactly the same handicapping criteria based on pure statistical data are considered to make the decision.
Forget that I feed into the software the data about the last 5 games played by each team (including projected starting pitchers) to get these picks.
Thanks!
I made the title thinking to compare it with another system I run for 3-4 weeks, which was still running at that time. Compared to that it's a lot less plays.
(See the link in the first post of this thread!)
See, in some days I can have just one play, or even no plays. In other days there may be even 8-9 plays.
Just what the software decides to do, lol...
I'm very curious how many plays will be there for today?
If it's some pattern, based on what I have seen so far, I would think that no more than 3-4.
