Wednesday's Results
2 u - LA Dodgers -1 -160 = 2-6, Lost 3.2 u
2 u - Boston -1 -139 = 4-9, Lost 2.78 u
2 u - Cincinnati +143 = 2-3, Lost 1.399 u
2 u - Chi. Cubs -1 -137 = 3-1, Won 2 u
2 u - Minnesota +125 = PPD
2 u - Atlanta +131 = 3-4, Lost 1.527 u
2 u - Chi. White Sox -105 = 2-3, Lost 2.1 u
2 u - Baltimore -125 = 0-1, Lost 2.5 u
Record of the day: 1 W - 6 L / -11.506 u
Overall record: 14 W - 10 L - 1 P / +4.778 u
2 u - LA Dodgers -1 -160 = 2-6, Lost 3.2 u
2 u - Boston -1 -139 = 4-9, Lost 2.78 u
2 u - Cincinnati +143 = 2-3, Lost 1.399 u
2 u - Chi. Cubs -1 -137 = 3-1, Won 2 u
2 u - Minnesota +125 = PPD
2 u - Atlanta +131 = 3-4, Lost 1.527 u
2 u - Chi. White Sox -105 = 2-3, Lost 2.1 u
2 u - Baltimore -125 = 0-1, Lost 2.5 u
Record of the day: 1 W - 6 L / -11.506 u
Overall record: 14 W - 10 L - 1 P / +4.778 u
It was a nightmare day.
In fact these results reflect very much the results from yesterday in my main system
( http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1057340 ).
Let's see what I will do today, how much I will raise my units.
Probably will be anything between 3-4 u, depending on how many plays I will have.
This is how I imagined this money management for this system - to raise after losing days.
Maybe it would be a lot better to always use 2 units per play, but this remains to be seen after at least 5 weeks.
In fact these results reflect very much the results from yesterday in my main system
( http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1057340 ).
Let's see what I will do today, how much I will raise my units.
Probably will be anything between 3-4 u, depending on how many plays I will have.
This is how I imagined this money management for this system - to raise after losing days.
Maybe it would be a lot better to always use 2 units per play, but this remains to be seen after at least 5 weeks.
Friday's Results
2.8 u - Chi. Cubs -1 -125 = 13-2, Won 2.8 u
2.8 u - Washington -1.5 -130 = 5-8, Lost 3.64 u
2.8 u - Cleveland -147 = 13-3, Won 2.8 u
2.8 u - San Diego +137 = 8-6, Won 2.8 u
2.8 u - Texas -1 -172 = 8-5, Won 2.8 u
2.8 u - Kansas City +112 = 7-3, Won 2.8 u
2.8 u - Seattle +117 = 3-6, Lost 2.393 u
Record of the day: 5 W - 2 L / +7.967 u
Overall record: 21 W - 12 L - 2 P / +20.745 u
2.8 u - Chi. Cubs -1 -125 = 13-2, Won 2.8 u
2.8 u - Washington -1.5 -130 = 5-8, Lost 3.64 u
2.8 u - Cleveland -147 = 13-3, Won 2.8 u
2.8 u - San Diego +137 = 8-6, Won 2.8 u
2.8 u - Texas -1 -172 = 8-5, Won 2.8 u
2.8 u - Kansas City +112 = 7-3, Won 2.8 u
2.8 u - Seattle +117 = 3-6, Lost 2.393 u
Record of the day: 5 W - 2 L / +7.967 u
Overall record: 21 W - 12 L - 2 P / +20.745 u
This looks good so far.
I'm not sure yet what kind of money management to apply.
When started I thought I would play every pick to win 2 units, and after a loser day I would raise the unit size with the same amount on all picks per that day, until the losing day's units are won back (if a second loser day happens, than raise again for the 3rd day).
But these results would work really well with flat betting too, each pick to win 3 units.
Maybe I should have a parallel record keeping for such flat betting too.
Yesterday the SF pick was 1 u, and that would have been just 1.5 u when flat betting... Every once in a while I may have some picks which will be of just 1/2 value compared to other picks from the same day's card.
I'm not sure yet what kind of money management to apply.
When started I thought I would play every pick to win 2 units, and after a loser day I would raise the unit size with the same amount on all picks per that day, until the losing day's units are won back (if a second loser day happens, than raise again for the 3rd day).
But these results would work really well with flat betting too, each pick to win 3 units.
Maybe I should have a parallel record keeping for such flat betting too.
Yesterday the SF pick was 1 u, and that would have been just 1.5 u when flat betting... Every once in a while I may have some picks which will be of just 1/2 value compared to other picks from the same day's card.
