LeBron won't play if Sterling refuses to sell

[Shub]

You're laughably pathetic.

Why don't you whine that you've had some sort of tough time and you're all emotional again?

Do you have your period or something?

.

 

[Shub]

You're laughably pathetic.

Why don't you whine that you've had some sort of tough time and you're all emotional again?

Do you have your period or something?

Thats all you got? haha

 

[Acebb]

Thats all you got? haha

I love the fact that you think your whining and "I wish I could shut you up"!!! are responsive.

"Racially charged"

You're an imbecile.

Go whine somewhere else, ****.

 

[Acebb]

projecting or accurately assessing? That second part was from a movie, i didn't expect you to get it though.

Projecting.

Hey, is this an example of one of my "racially charged" comments, ****?

 

[Acebb]

You're a little bitch. You say that shit when your on the computer but act like a bitch in real life, lol.

You're a whiny bitch on the Internet.

Just think, you actually can not handle what someone types without going all emotional and racist.

Hilarious.

 

[Acebb]

Why did his post upset you? His comments on the lockout were factual (he did take a few shots at AK, but not you) I understand being upset with the ridiculous racially charged comments but not this one.

You have to remember that this kid is a silly racist and basically an emotional basket case.

He's reached the point where any and every comment that isn't agreeable is "racially charged"

Dude needs to get a new hobby.

 

[snoop]

You're a little bitch. You say that shit when your on the computer but act like a bitch in real life, lol.

Troll said what?

 

[akphidelt]

Since you don't seem to grasp that the owners locked out the players 3 years ago, including King James, and took $3 billion in revenue from the players union, yeah, you're 100% wrong.

Not only that, but the very fact you are suggesting players would "liquidate assets" (do you have any idea how long it takes to sell a $3 million dollar house for example?) in order to support an idiotic boycott that would never, ever happen, demonstrates you have not the slightest bit of understanding of how idiotic you sound (mainly because you have no actual assets, that phrase just sounds nice to you)

You should really shut up on this topic. You won't, of course.

First of all I never said the players won or loss, I simply made a statement that they have boycotted before and did it recently so it's not that far fetched for them to do. But the voices in your head tell you stuff that isn't there.

Second, I'm sure most if not all the players have financial advisers who do not leave $400k or whatever in a savings account. So liquidating assets does not mean they have to sell their houses, lol. You are really dumb.

 

[PatsFan1283]

First of all I never said the players won or loss, I simply made a statement that they have boycotted before and did it recently so it's not that far fetched for them to do. But the voices in your head tell you stuff that isn't there.

Second, I'm sure most if not all the players have financial advisers who do not leave $400k or whatever in a savings account. So liquidating assets does not mean they have to sell their houses, lol. You are really dumb.

When did the players boycott before? What are you talking about?

Lockout means the owners lock you out, strike is more similar to boycotting. There hasn't been a strike in professional sports since MLB in '94. The MLB players union is also far stronger than the NBAs for a bunch of reasons...

 

[akphidelt]

When did the players boycott before? What are you talking about?

Lockout means the owners lock you out, strike is more similar to boycotting. There hasn't been a strike in professional sports since MLB in '94. The MLB players union is also far stronger than the NBAs for a bunch of reasons...

Boycott, strike, whatever you want to call it. The NBA players union has chosen to fight the NBA and sit out games. That's the only point I was making. Simply because these guys think it is so far fetched the the NBA players would boycott if Sterling were allowed in the league.

 

[Acebb]

Boycott, strike, whatever you want to call it. The NBA players union has chosen to fight the NBA and sit out games. That's the only point I was making. Simply because these guys think it is so far fetched the the NBA players would boycott if Sterling were allowed in the league.

Um, no, no they did not. They did not 'choose' to sit out anything.

As I said, you don't know the difference between a lockout and a strike.

Again, why do you keep posting on this topic?

 

[Acebb]

First of all I never said the players won or loss, I simply made a statement that they have boycotted before and did it recently so it's not that far fetched for them to do. But the voices in your head tell you stuff that isn't there.

Except you said they, and I quote, "they will go over couple % points of revenue" implying they got that revenue.

They did not. They lost, idiot.

 

[akphidelt]

Um, no, no they did not. They did not 'choose' to sit out anything.

As I said, you don't know the difference between a lockout and a strike.

Again, why do you keep posting on this topic?

Sure they did choose to fight the owners. Whether you want to debate the differences between strikes, lockouts, boycotts, whatever makes you happy... that's up to you. My point was simply that the players have fought the owners and missed paychecks before and did it recently. Not sure why that is such hard comment to comprehend, lol.

 

[akphidelt]

Except you said they, and I quote, "they will go over couple % points of revenue" implying they got that revenue.

They did not. They lost, idiot.

That's not implying that at all, lol.

 

[SheriffJoe]

Um, no, no they did not. They did not 'choose' to sit out anything.

As I said, you don't know the difference between a lockout and a strike.

Again, why do you keep posting on this topic?

face)(*^%

 

[Acebb]

My point was simply that the players have fought the owners and missed paychecks before and did it recently. Not sure why that is such hard comment to comprehend, lol.

Except you were saying they "sat out" purposely.

Now you've been reduced to saying they "fought"

Don't worry, you're so dumb you don't even know you're now back pedaling.

 

[Acebb]

That's not implying that at all, lol.

Yes it is, LOL

They will "go far" for a "couple points of revenue" totally implies they will do it to lose.

Really.

It does.

Idiot.

 

[akphidelt]

Except you were saying they "sat out" purposely.

Now you've been reduced to saying they "fought"

Don't worry, you're so dumb you don't even know you're now back pedaling.

You're playing word games. The players missed paychecks by fighting with the NBA owners. And the fight was over couple % points in revenue. The only point I was making. Whether I used the wrong words or not, that's up for you to play with.

 

[akphidelt]

Yes it is, LOL

They will "go far" for a "couple points of revenue" totally implies they will do it to lose.

Really.

It does.

Idiot.

It does not imply it at all. Lol.

 

[Acebb]

You're playing word games.

Actually, I'm quoting you. You, nobody else, said the players sat out.

The players did not sit out.

Instead of admitting you did not know that, you're backpedaling.