In the moments immediately following the Kentucky Derby on Saturday, trainer Bill Mott said his thoughts were of how well his colts Country House and Tacitus had run, and he figured they’d both be bound for the Belmont Stakes next.
Once they took Max Sec. down from the win, i wasn't affected and I KNOW it was the right decision ( still hurt like HELL) after watching races for more than 40 years.... But how they figured he should be placed -17th was it; kinda seems a little far down...I can see out of the money, but 17th? The Preakness will be interesting.
Once they took Max Sec. down from the win, i wasn't affected and I KNOW it was the right decision ( still hurt like HELL) after watching races for more than 40 years.... But how they figured he should be placed -17th was it; kinda seems a little far down...I can see out of the money, but 17th? The Preakness will be interesting.
On why jockey Tyler Gaffalione didn't claim foul, and how he feels about riders having to claim foul in general:*
"When Tyler came back, he said he clipped heels. He said how he didn't go down, he didn't know. And we talked for a second about [claiming foul]. But we didn't feel - what, so we could be sixth? I don't think riders should have to claim foul. I think it's up to the stewards to make those decisions. [Jockeys], you want them to work every day beside each other and get along. Do you think [if I'm a rider], I'm gonna take the biggest race of [another rider's] life away? So I can be sixth? They shouldn't put the riders in that predicament. These are their friends. They ride with them every day."
"I would say if there was any mistake yesterday - and I have to say, I have the highest respect for the stewards - it was the inquiry sign should have gone up as soon as they passed the wire. ... I was actually kind of surprised it wasn’t up.”
Most are forgetting a Key Element, there was NO inquiry
9 out of 10 of these Jockey objections don't stand, and I've seen worst where the outcome didn't change the results
just my 2 cents
How does Mott get to claim foul when his horse wasn't even effected by any infraction that may have occurred?
I put this in the horse racing forum and I'm putting it here. Guys who say they know horse racing and think the right call was made don't know horse racing like they think they do. No offense.
The rules are different for a race of this calibre and size field. They have never before taken a horse down in the Derby in 147 years. Precedent means everything. Ask any lawyer. That infraction was not near bad enough to overrule precedent.
I have to very respectfully disagree, Michelangelo. All racing should be judged equally, just like a baseball game or football. It’s not a perfect world so mistakes do happen.
It was a pretty flagrant foul yesterday. I could see a scenario play out where, if there was no foul, War of Wills pulls up alongside Max and they engage in a head to head duel. Either one could win, or another horse (dare I say Country House?) could pass them both as they tire each other out. That’s just one scenario.
In any case, I respect your opinion. Hope you had a winning day yesterday!