IVU Thread/QAnon Dictionary and Meaning of Terms

Search

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,132
Tokens
I am placing this entire entry here just uttered by sbd as well as in the sbd Failed Prediction Thread because it is VINTAGE sbd bullshit, lies, delusions, fantasy panic,

paranoia or whatever you want to call it:


"STAY CALM. STAY AWARE. STAY SAFE. STAY UNITED.

If you can't see that something big is about to happen you need to wake up!

Make sure you have extra food, water and cash on hand.

Fill up your cars gas tank and gas cans before you can't.

These next few weeks are going to be intense."
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,132
Tokens
Here's one for today that I don't think I have posted before, which was posted by sbd today:


"THE MILITARY IS IN FULL CONTROL"


Hmm- he has said the same thing for over a year and certainly on the day after the Election and in lots of

posts afterward.

The obvious question is that if the "military is in control" show us empirical and verifiable evidence that this

is true.

Simply stating that they and Trump are the ones really in charge and calling the shots doesn't get it done

except for the QAnons who are dumber and/or more delusional than sbd if that is possible.
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,132
Tokens
Although I just posted this in one of my other major threads, this belongs here also because it is within the scope and theme of this thread also:


And yet another one hot off the press from sbd:

"With the walls closing in on Fraudci fast now is a good time to bring forward this post from last August.

By now I think you know the answers to some of these questions.

At minimum, you should at least understand why Moderna was always pushed first!"


Lets just say that he said that the walls were "closing in fast" on Dr. Fauci over a year ago and many times after that.

Perhaps sbd should define how the word "fast" is defined in his dictionary and/or that of the QAnons.

In the world in which I reside and the definition of the word "fast," if in fact the walls are closing in on Dr. Fauci(which is obviously

nothing more than a projection of sbd's fantasies and wildest hopes in any case), sbd should say that the walls have closed in and will continue to close

in on Dr. Fauci at a snail's pace!! lol
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,132
Tokens
Actually I don't have any new words or terms to add today to sbd's/the QAnon's dictionary, but I do have one for the real world one, which I haven't

mentioned specifically before, but should have because they apply every day to the bullshit, lies, delusions, paranoia,

failed predictions, failed to be proven conspiratorial theories and so much more that we hear every day!!

The applicable words are WASH, RINSE AND REPEAT!!
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,132
Tokens
Today sbd used the word "sinister" in his thread to describe Covid and the vaccine.

If you go to my failed Prediciton Thread, you will see that it raises questions about what the word "sinister" means as used by sbd today and/or in the

QAnon dictionary.

The only thing which I believe that the word means in their definition is that it is an all purpose word to be used to fit the lie, bullshit or contradictory

statement/narrative made at that particular moment.

If I am incorrect, perhaps sbd can enlighten us all and tell us what it "really" does mean! lol
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,132
Tokens
I haven't posted anything here in a while, but today I have a phrase/prediction which fpp/sbd has used over and over again including

today and NOT ONCE has ever come true.

It is this:

"This is not going end well for Warren"(stated today) as well as stated above for too many other "evil" folks to count.

To be politically correct and in terms of the "success rate" of these failures, to be politically correct, the phrase should be

"This is not going to end well for fpp/sbd!""


 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,132
Tokens
I erroneously posted this in wrong thread:

Here is the last line which was just posted by fpp/sbd:

"This won't end well for CBS."


It sure didn't take fpp/sbd very long to prove that I didn't make up what I said in previous post. lol

And kudos to fpp/sbd for his next post, making it a "hat trick" day just like that!!! lol


"Griswold just got roasted!

Being called the Fauci of elections is not a good thing.

"This isn't going to end well for Griswold or Fauci."
 

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
34,132
Tokens
Maybe fpp/sbd can help me out here.

If according to fpp/sbd and QAnons if Biden is the "fake" POTUS and Trump is the "real" POTUS, then why is it using empirical and visible evidence as

the criterion, that the "fake" POTUS has made all of the policies and decisions since Inauguration Day, whereas the "real" one is a bystander

and hasn't been able to do anything about it???

Could this be "perhaps" another confusing and open-ended example of a definition on the part of fpp/sbd as was/is the case of "Trump's Return" so

as allow him after the fact to choose whichever definition one fits his narrative???
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,442
Messages
13,533,325
Members
100,367
Latest member
rcdjbp
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com