That is not a surprising response from someone like yourself who can do no better than beg the question, poison the name and result
to insults and most importantly as I proved for the zillionth time oveer the weekend, not respond and run away and
hide when asked to respond SPECIFICALLY to tough but fair questions asked by ME because you and everyone else
realize that you have none that will fly!!
If you like and/or disagree, I will l gladly repost the questions that you avoided answering as well as remind you of your cowardice
to openly disagree with sbd about anything!!
Now go run away and hide under your bed rather than face up to the fact that you are a minor leaguer when it comes to
debating someone who is well skilled and experienced in this skill!!
In case you "didn't see it" or "forgot," Lenny Boy, here is a repost of what I so accurately posted about you last night!!
Would you care to shock the world and actually respond to this or as I suspect, do what the groundhog does on Groundhog]]Day
when he sees his shadow!! lol
Here you go:
"Let's take a look at you over the last few days before you criticize me!!
As usual, I politely asked you several times to answer a question and as usual you ran away and hid and did not respond!!
This time the question was/is can the economy or other matters in the country between now and the primaries and/or
the Election that can have an election on Trump's fate and/or how people perceive them which could possibly alter
your static polling data as it exits today as how it is right before the Election??
Your total lack of response to DIRECTLY answer this, not answer it all and/or try to change the subject tells me that you do not have
any kind of response to refute the implication of what I said about your static approach to one which is more dynamic and at least
considers the possibility that things can change between now and then!!
Actually, I want to modify want a little bit.
As I see it, your static approach to Trump, Biden, etc. and using today only as the standard applies ONLY if what is today bodes well
for Trump and badly for Biden whether it be polling data or something else!!
However in your one-way approach, if what exists now for example is bad for Trump, then you can and will use
the future and make predictions to try to convert the bad into good.
The most glaring example of this is Jack Smith.
Right now Trump is in deep doo-doo with the law whether you agree with the charges or not largely because of Jack Smith's
efforts.
That said, as you are unable to find anything in your static approach to bail Trump out, in this case, you use a more
dynamic approach and make a future prediction that Jack Smith will fail in his efforts when all is said and done.
To cut to the chase, using the Lenny Lenbo methodology, it is a case of wanting to have it both ways to promote your
agenda-in short it is heads Lenny wins and tails you lose and Lenny still wins!!
I just put you in your place and proved my point as I stated in the first two sentences.
Let's see if you will step up to the plate this time and try to rebut what I just outlined about the glaring inconsistencies in your posting
modus operandi or as I suspect not respond to it DIRECTLY or just run away and avoid the question as you always do when I
hit you with tough but fair questions!!
ps If you don't understand my points and/or are unable to respond, then I suggest you consult the "brain trust" of sbd,
sheriff joe and doctor success for help and advice!! lol"
www.upi.com
