My response is totally valid . It’s 100% Lawfare BS to do two things . Tie him up during the campaign and sway public opinion.
Now keep running from addressing these “ethical” judges and DAs comments and actions .
Stuff that the ? News Network would never address .
You run along, pal, as once again you are doing as you always do, namely avoid the question/try to twist it, ask your own question rather
than answer mine and in most of cases just run away and hide such as when I confront you with a relevant question such
as whether you agree with sbd or not about certain issues or not because you are afraid of offending hid majesty if you answer
in the wrong way.
The question I posed about the 91 Trump indictments and your refusal to answer it directly but rather to say there would be no
indictments if it all wasn't politically motivated makes as much sense as your saying that an apprehended bank robber should
not be charged because he claims the reason he robbed the bank was that he needed it to feed his family, pay off a loan, etc.
Again don't expect any response from me until I get some DIRECT answers from you that I don't expect from you as
a person who has a sick and disturbing obsession with a 77-year-old CRIMINAL ex-POTUS who he deifies and who is scared shitless
as to how his life can continue if somehow this person is no longer politically relevant and worse if he is tossed into
the slammer!!
Go to run, for now, MR. INFLEXIBLE/STONEWALL!!
Please let me know what if anything Trump did not only as a POTUS before, on, or after it that he should not have done including
any of the 91 indictments and then get back to me!!