<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by lander:
Oh, nevermind.
3.5 pts on a HT total???
Danny, the line was bad. Do the right thing.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Lander it was 3.
I can buy that it was a bad line, but they clearly waited until the outcome was known. They had plenty of time to cancel the play beforehand. I put it in well more than 1 hour before the game even started.
How do we know that books arent putting up a line they know is bad - getting heavy action on 1 side obviously and then cancelling when they lose, and letting it stand when they win.
Was ACES GOLDS line on NE + 14 1/2 a BAD LINE ?
Should all the players who bet it be called scammers or was ACES GOLD trying to pull something ?
Oh, nevermind.
3.5 pts on a HT total???
Danny, the line was bad. Do the right thing.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Lander it was 3.
I can buy that it was a bad line, but they clearly waited until the outcome was known. They had plenty of time to cancel the play beforehand. I put it in well more than 1 hour before the game even started.
How do we know that books arent putting up a line they know is bad - getting heavy action on 1 side obviously and then cancelling when they lose, and letting it stand when they win.
Was ACES GOLDS line on NE + 14 1/2 a BAD LINE ?
Should all the players who bet it be called scammers or was ACES GOLD trying to pull something ?