Intrinzik, we'll just agree to disagree. I'm not a big player at all and don't pretend to be. I play a little for fun and that's good enough for me. I like the challenge of picking winners and handing them out to people. Not everyone can do what I'm saying because they dont' have the discipline to make 1-2 plays a day.
I'm making it simple because that's what I think it is. When you look at the play I posted today I had the Philly RL at -135. I briefly looked over the numbers and it was an easy selection for me. I didn't need any mathematical value. I looked at it and said that Philly would win by more than 2 runs. Now you can shop for the best line if you'd like but the play is the play and I don't need anything extra to figure that out.
Over the last 6 days I've given out 6 plays and am 6-0 in those plays. There are maybe 3 responses in my thread. The reason for that is a lot of these guys need "action" and want to play more games so they bypass my thread. It's too bad they do or they'd probably be winning.
Agreed.
I believe that the reason we have different view points, is that once you get beyond doing this for fun you look at things differently. You approach each bet more as an investment than a bet, and to tell you the truth a good majority of the fun dissolved as well. The part I still have fun with is not the actual bet itself (in fact I rarely watch a game where I have a bet pending, nor do I scoreboard watch unless I am looking for something in particular on a half time bet), but the research and grind of developing edges and angles and taking those and extrapolating them into a dozen different paths and seeing where each path leads.