I disagree with that statement. If you can do 12 Reps at 180, you can put up 230+. Yes, your muscles get trained with endurance as in higher reps, but your strength also increases. If you put 240 on the bar, you'll be able to handle it and it wont fall to your chest. They have calculators online that compare things like this also....
There are calculators, and no matter whether you have tried the higher amount or not you will automatically be in that range, I would say 180x12 would easily put you in the 225-230 range one time minimum.
He was obviously pulling numbers from the air. He can probably do 135lbs for 10 reps, and maxes out at 180.Yea thats my point. Those calculators will just show you approximately the range you would be in, but if you do 180x12, then you can easily do 2 plates, probably more.
According to one calculator, if you do 180x10 (cause 12 was not an input option), your max is 240. These are just approximations, but they are accurate.
There are calculators, and no matter whether you have tried the higher amount or not you will automatically be in that range, I would say 180x12 would easily put you in the 225-230 range one time minimum.
It depends on what you are training for. No Collegiate Program trying to weight train baseball players of all sports, where flexibility is extremely important to maintain a fluid arm stroke, is going to weight train for mass.
Lower reps = You Gain Mass
Higher reps = Maintenance, strength, endurance
If you try to train for mass in baseball, you large muscle groups in your arms like biceps and triceps will get too large and your small muscles, ligaments, etc like your rotator cuff wont be able to support it.
Not to mention you are going to get too stiff.
There is no right or wrong way to weight train, as long as you are doing it towards the appropriate goal.
I have no concerns with athletics now, I am training for mass and strength. The best and most efficient number of reps for mass and strength training is 6-8. Baseball players will do sets of 12-15 on everything except legs, where they will do 6-8.
Here's oneYea thats my point. Those calculators will just show you approximately the range you would be in, but if you do 180x12, then you can easily do 2 plates, probably more.
According to one calculator, if you do 180x10 (cause 12 was not an input option), your max is 240. These are just approximations, but they are accurate.
That's not even taking into account that he said he can do 180 for 12 reps for 3 sets. Assumming that the last rep for the third set absolutely kills him, that means he should be able to do at least 190lbs for one, 12 rep set which pushes his max even higher. Nobody on earth underestimates their max bench by 50lbs or even 25lbs. Considering the source, i've compiled these percentages; 80% he is completely lying out his ass, 15% he is exaggerating moderately, 5% he's being completely honest.
That's not even taking into account that he said he can do 180 for 12 reps for 3 sets. Assumming that the last rep for the third set absolutely kills him, that means he should be able to do at least 190lbs for one, 12 rep set which pushes his max even higher. Nobody on earth underestimates their max bench by 50lbs or even 25lbs. Considering the source, i've compiled these percentages; 80% he is completely lying out his ass, 15% he is exaggerating moderately, 5% he's being completely honest.
Just think if Mr. Wonderful and HeatOhio were still around... :monsters-