How does replay rule that a no catch...seriously

Search

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,781
Tokens
In every other level of football that was a touchdown. I have no idea why the NFL has decided that if you bobble a ball after your cross the goal line (or fall out of bounds after getting 2 feet in) that there is an additional "process to the catch" but this is just dumb. Why do they have to over complicate everything?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,773
Tokens
the third and final replay on this video clearly shows the ball on the ground and and rotation which proves he did not maintain control through contact with the ground

it was the correct call, which is becoming the consensus in the football universe

hate the rule if you must, but it's the rule and combined with high definition slow motion replays these types of calls are made each and every Sunday, just not with 7 seconds left

I sometimes disagree with the assessment that the receiver never established himself as a runner, like in the Dez Bryant call in the playoffs vs GB that eliminated Dallas a couple of years ago, but it can't be argued Jesse James established himself as a runner yesterday

Not on Bell Fibe 4k! No clear frame showing the ball on the ground!
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,993
Tokens
In every other level of football that was a touchdown. I have no idea why the NFL has decided that if you bobble a ball after your cross the goal line (or fall out of bounds after getting 2 feet in) that there is an additional "process to the catch" but this is just dumb. Why do they have to over complicate everything?

These extra rules are to control outcomes of games......look at Carolina when the receiver caught the ball in back of end zone & his backside landed on the outside if goal line, reviewed it & said it stands as a TD, lol! You can't make up shit like this.......its fully controlled by these crooked refs.
 

Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2009
Messages
9,723
Tokens
I don't know what Bell Fibe 4k is, but on the 1080 pix 4K HD LED tv I was watching they stopped the replay to show the ball touching the ground.

Maybe a new device to watch sports is in your future PHD in SPORTS
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,773
Tokens
These extra rules are to control outcomes of games......look at Carolina when the receiver caught the ball in back of end zone & his backside landed on the outside if goal line, reviewed it & said it stands as a TD, lol! You can't make up shit like this.......its fully controlled by these crooked refs.


Exactly! He had "control" of the ball for .01 seconds and part of his butt cheek hits the endline! James had the ball for at least a full second! The league is a joke!





DRSw6uYU8AAgl-5.jpg
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,993
Tokens
Just a matter of time before Patriot hater GEDinsports would weigh in with his stupidity.

I don't know about hating on the Pats, I think the Pats will go down as the best coach/Qb combo of all time. Pats are an anomaly, & we will never see it again, like Jordan & Phil Jackson at Bulls.

This had to do with crooked refs, & the Pats just happen to be in these controversial games, like the tuck rule game.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,781
Tokens
Exactly! He had "control" of the ball for .01 seconds and part of his butt cheek hits the endline! James had the ball for at least a full second! The league is a joke!





DRSw6uYU8AAgl-5.jpg

There is it. Ball in full control, elbow down, ball over goal line. TD.

The rule is just idiotic. I feel like they made the rule more complicated to justify that horrendous call against Dez in the playoffs a few years ago.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,950
Tokens
I don't know about hating on the Pats, I think the Pats will go down as the best coach/Qb combo of all time. Pats are an anomaly, & we will never see it again, like Jordan & Phil Jackson at Bulls.

This had to do with crooked refs, & the Pats just happen to be in these controversial games, like the tuck rule game.

Crooked refs? ROFL. What benefit is it to the refs in the booth to give the game away to the visiting team? They abided by the rule, if you don't
like the rule, change it.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,993
Tokens
Crooked refs? ROFL. What benefit is it to the refs in the booth to give the game away to the visiting team? They abided by the rule, if you don't
like the rule, change it.

This is exactly like when the FBI changed the wording against Hillary from"grossly negligent" to "extremely careless,".......we all know what a catch is, but crooked refs just like some crooked agents, change shit around to fit a narrative.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,773
Tokens
Just a matter of time before Patriot hater GEDinsports would weigh in with his stupidity.

Can't face the facts, resort to name-calling! Funny when Liberal posters do this you criticize! Patriot hater LOL given your "logic" I should have a much bigger hate on FC Barcelona a true sports dynasty rather than the cheating scum from the northeast!
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,950
Tokens
Can't face the facts, resort to name-calling! Funny when Liberal posters do this you criticize! Patriot hater LOL given your "logic" I should have a much bigger hate on FC Barcelona a true sports dynasty rather than the cheating scum from the northeast!

You're just not very bright.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,773
Tokens
Exactly! He had "control" of the ball for .01 seconds and part of his butt cheek hits the endline! James had the ball for at least a full second! The league is a joke!





DRSw6uYU8AAgl-5.jpg


Incredible that the play on left is called a touchdown yet the play on right is not.

Yet the refs missed this one too on the last play!


rowe-rogers-steelers-patriots.png



Jersey is clearly pulled, grabbed before the ball gets there. But the refs of course clearly saw the ball on the ground when it was being bobbled! Joke of a league!
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,950
Tokens

  • Bill BarnwellESPN Staff Writer

Under the NFL's definition of a catch, the league was right to take away what looked to be a game-winning Jesse James touchdown catch at the end of Sunday night's Patriots-Steelers game. There are still unanswered questions -- notably, if the call was as easy as the explanations of Alberto Riveron and Tony Corrente have suggested, why it took what felt like 10 minutes to overturn the call -- but everyone on the league side of things seems to agree that the review was processed properly and led to the correct call.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
44,950
Tokens

  • Bill BarnwellESPN Staff Writer

Under the NFL's definition of a catch, the league was right to take away what looked to be a game-winning Jesse James touchdown catch at the end of Sunday night's Patriots-Steelers game. There are still unanswered questions -- notably, if the call was as easy as the explanations of Alberto Riveron and Tony Corrente have suggested, why it took what felt like 10 minutes to overturn the call -- but everyone on the league side of things seems to agree that the review was processed properly and led to the correct call.


"but everyone on the league side of things seems to agree that the review was processed properly and led to the correct call."

 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
19,327
Tokens
it's the Steelers rules don't apply

it's plain as day to everyone else
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,773
Tokens

  • Bill BarnwellESPN Staff Writer

Under the NFL's definition of a catch, the league was right to take away what looked to be a game-winning Jesse James touchdown catch at the end of Sunday night's Patriots-Steelers game. There are still unanswered questions -- notably, if the call was as easy as the explanations of Alberto Riveron and Tony Corrente have suggested, why it took what felt like 10 minutes to overturn the call -- but everyone on the league side of things seems to agree that the review was processed properly and led to the correct call.

Whoa! What a find! The league is supporting the call! Really!?!?! Pat yourself on the back for that one! Still no clear footage of the ball hitting the ground! Reply showed the ball being bobbled but James's hand appears to be underneath the ball.
 

Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2009
Messages
9,723
Tokens
Whoa! What a find! The league is supporting the call! Really!?!?! Pat yourself on the back for that one! Still no clear footage of the ball hitting the ground! Reply showed the ball being bobbled but James's hand appears to be underneath the ball.
Then get a new TV lol

His hand ain't even close to under the ball.

Didn't survive the ground man, let it go.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
18,993
Tokens
"but everyone on the league side of things seems to agree that the review was processed properly and led to the correct call."


Lmao......haha haha! The league is on the refs side? Really, how can that be? Are you joking.......this is like the feds are on Hillary's side, hence no prosecution.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,793
Messages
13,537,029
Members
100,392
Latest member
Warbobeagle
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com