How Are They Going To Force Sterling To Sell??

Search

Breaking News: MikeB not running for president
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
13,179
Tokens
I'm not the nitwit who confused 600 million with 600 billion, so, maybe you'd better ask yourself that.

seriously? Now you want to make dozens of posts about that the fact i made a typo? Weird man.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,738
Tokens
The NBA owners do not need to prove if he knew or didn't know that he was being recorded

You can't even grasp that "Willfully" has a definition

You typing this stupid bullshit is beclowning.

Remember, this is "complex" except when it is "not complicated"

Idiot.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,738
Tokens
Remember, the dumb little kid is asserting that the NBA actually put a legal term into a legally binding document that doesn't mean what it says.

At least according to our resident idiot.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Remember, the dumb little kid is asserting that the NBA actually put a legal term into a legally binding document that doesn't mean what it says.

At least according to our resident idiot.

Actually they put it in terms where it doesn't matter whether he meant to do it or not...

13(d) Fail or refuse to fulfill its contractual obligations to
the Association, its Members, Players, or any other third party in such a
way as to affect the Association or its Members adversely.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,738
Tokens
Actually they put it in terms where it doesn't matter whether he meant to do it or not...

13(d) Fail or refuse to fulfill its contractual obligations to
the Association, its Members, Players, or any other third party in such a
way as to affect the Association or its Members adversely.

Sterling's interview "apology" with Anderson Cooper was just as damaging and probably would be more appropriate for Silver to talk about. He attacked a prominent basketball ambassador, former coach, announcer, by inaccurately saying he had "Those AIDS"
 

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
2,131
Tokens
Lol, that's according to federal/state laws. Not according to the NBA Constitution. The NBA owners do not need to prove if he knew or didn't know that he was being recorded. Means absolutely nothing according to their Association.

Like I said, you know very little about just everything. Lol. Willful in the context of the NBA Constitution simply means he committed an act that adversely affects the Association. They don't even need to prove it.

It's one thing to be completely ignorant but it's another thing altogether to take pride in it. It's comical how wrong you are.

You have shown your complete inability to comprehend even the most simple and basic legal concepts. Here you show you don't even know the definition of a simple word.

Just because you say something doesn't make it true. You just repeat nonsense and cite to nothing and assume its true. You're a lunatic.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
It's one thing to be completely ignorant but it's another thing altogether to take pride in it. It's comical how wrong you are.

You have shown your complete inability to comprehend even the most simple and basic legal concepts. Here you show you don't even know the definition of a simple word.

Just because you say something doesn't make it true. You just repeat nonsense and cite to nothing and assume its true. You're a lunatic.

I was incorrect about the meaning of willful in the context of this discussion. I'll admit that. I forgot article 13(d) didn't mention willful at all and the Constitution does not specify that the owners need to prove he willfully violated the NBA Constitution as the verbiage does not say he has to willfully violate the Constitution for the owners to kick him out.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
seriously? Now you want to make dozens of posts about that the fact i made a typo? Weird man.

"billions," not "millions," now "dozens of posts" instead of about two. Embellish much? I merely responded to you flappin' your gums when you made a mistake and tried to minimize it. If you want to actually REACH dozens of posts, we can certainly do that...or, you could STFU.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Sterling's interview "apology" with Anderson Cooper was just as damaging and probably would be more appropriate for Silver to talk about. He attacked a prominent basketball ambassador, former coach, announcer, by inaccurately saying he had "Those AIDS"

Him refusing to pay the fine isn't gonna help his cause, either. Maybe the old prick will do a Joe Paterno and die soon, but, in any event, he will NOT own the team at the start of next season, and when that happens, I'll be pointing it out to all these schmucks, just like you will...
 

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
2,755
Tokens
Send this to the rubber room, what a disgraceful display of immaturity.

Thank you, even though The Rubber Room deserves better.

Back on topic, Sterling is a "scorched earth policy" kind of guy and is clearly dealing with dementia or substance abuse issues,maybe both. Reality is not on his menu, this could get very ugly.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
I was incorrect about the meaning of willful in the context of this discussion. I'll admit that. I forgot article 13(d) didn't mention willful at all and the Constitution does not specify that the owners need to prove he willfully violated the NBA Constitution as the verbiage does not say he has to willfully violate the Constitution for the owners to kick him out.

I told you about 20 pages ago you had the context of willful incorrect and you just called me dumb. Now you admit it on page 34?

Nice. Carry on this discussion. It's interesting yet stupid all at once.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
I told you about 20 pages ago you had the context of willful incorrect and you just called me dumb. Now you admit it on page 34?

Nice. Carry on this discussion. It's interesting yet stupid all at once.

Well it's all a matter of semantics and I was using it incorrectly, I will admit that. Since the NBA Constitution is different than the court of law I figured their interpretation of willful intent does not have to be proven to kick him out. Therefore willful means...

deliberate, voluntary, or intentional

And the actions he committed, even though were private... were deliberate and voluntary and intentional. Where I will concede I was wrong was that his actions didn't "willfully" violate the NBA Constitution. Although he willfully acted like a racist. And the owners do not need to prove he willfully violated the NBA Constitution so I made the mistake of thinking the NBA has to prove he willfully committed actions that affected the NBA whether he meant to or not. So even though it's not a big deal, I understand how people will take it. So you can just take the "willfully" part out of my argument and it remains the same.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,738
Tokens
While Sterling didn't willfully broadcast the comments that were taped in the girl's house, he certainly did with Anderson Cooper and made a fool of himself there. It will be interesting to see if Silver references those in the charges to the board of governors (if we get to find out what they are)
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
Well it's all a matter of semantics and I was using it incorrectly, I will admit that. Since the NBA Constitution is different than the court of law I figured their interpretation of willful intent does not have to be proven to kick him out. Therefore willful means...

deliberate, voluntary, or intentional

And the actions he committed, even though were private... were deliberate and voluntary and intentional. Where I will concede I was wrong was that his actions didn't "willfully" violate the NBA Constitution. Although he willfully acted like a racist. And the owners do not need to prove he willfully violated the NBA Constitution so I made the mistake of thinking the NBA has to prove he willfully committed actions that affected the NBA whether he meant to or not. So even though it's not a big deal, I understand how people will take it. So you can just take the "willfully" part out of my argument and it remains the same.

You are totally missing the point. It's not that his COMMENTS were deliberate, voluntary and intentional...that's not the issue. Willfully comes in when you discuss what the intentions of his comments were. Was he WILLFULLY attempting to disparage the NBA with those comments?

The answer is clearly "no."
 
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
6,813
Tokens
How would this go down if Michael Jordan made the exact same comments Sterling did except about whites? What if he said it about Hispanics?
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
You are totally missing the point. It's not that his COMMENTS were deliberate, voluntary and intentional...that's not the issue. Willfully comes in when you discuss what the intentions of his comments were. Was he WILLFULLY attempting to disparage the NBA with those comments?

The answer is clearly "no."

That's what I said
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
22,738
Tokens
The LA Times has gotten a copy of the NBA charges against Sterling. NBA alleges:

Donald Sterling tried to persuade companion V. Stiviano to say the Clippers owner was not responsible for the inflammatory statements about blacks after a now infamous audio recording became public, according to the NBA’s 30-page formal allegation that the league is using to try and get Sterling removed as owner.

The charges, obtained by the Los Angeles Times, said that Sterling's attempt to alter Stiviano's statements was part of an effort by Sterling — aided by his wife, Shelly, and Clippers President Andy Roeser — to evade responsibility for the recording that has enveloped the Clippers owner in controversy for nearly a month.
...
The professional basketball league has given Sterling until May 27 to respond to the allegations and a voluminous set of declarations that accompany them. A hearing has been set for June 3 in which Sterling will be able to present his case to 29 other NBA owners, who can remove him by a three-fourths vote.

http://www.latimes.com/sports/sport...-donald-sterling-stiviano-20140520-story.html
 
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
6,813
Tokens
I now am a fan of Sterling. Need more old school in this "discrimatory" world. I envy the position he is in. Hopefully he uses it to expose the truth. The US was once a super power and could be again if we stop being so nice to those beneath us.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,116,678
Messages
13,535,904
Members
100,387
Latest member
entegra
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com