Hilarious TRUMP Lovers

[superbeets]

[h=6]- AUGUST 12, 2016 -[/h][h=1]TRUMP CAMPAIGN STATEMENT ON HILLARY CLINTON’S TAXES[/h]"Hillary Clinton has turned over the only records nobody wants to see from her – the American public wants to see the 33,000 emails she deleted to obstruct an FBI investigation. We want to see the Clinton Foundation records showing how the Clintons sold our uranium to Russia, ripped off Haiti and cut deals with oppressive regimes around the world. We want to see the pay-for-play emails that Clinton’s Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills, refuses to turn over. We want to see the transcripts of the secret Wall Street speeches Clinton was paid $10,000 dollars-a-minute to give. We want to see the records the night of Benghazi that explain why Secretary Clinton didn't send in reinforcements as soon as the attack had begun.

Hillary Clinton is at the center of an international corruption scandal that reveals her use of government authority and influence for personal gain. The records we need to see are those being hidden, deleted, obstructed and stashed away by Hillary Clinton to keep authorities from untangling this corrupt scheme that reaches into the world's shady corridors of power. Everything she doesn't want us to see has been digitally shredded or put under lock and key. This document release is nothing more than an attempt at distraction and misdirection by an individual who created and then purged an illegal private email server."

- Jason Miller, Senior Communications Advisor

 

[superbeets]

[h=6]- AUGUST 12, 2016 -[/h][h=1]HILLARY CLINTON’S RADICAL JOB-KILLING ENERGY PLAN[/h]Hillary Clinton’s Embrace Of President Obama’s Radical Environmental Agenda Will Kill Jobs And Hurt The Economy
Clinton Has Praised President Obama’s Radical Environmental Agenda And Has Vowed To Expand Upon It:
Clinton Has Vowed To “Defend And Build On” The Obama Administration’s Anti-Coal Regulations, Which Has Earned Her Support From Environmentalists But Led To Concerns From Labor Unions. “Clinton was quick last week to praise President Obama’s stricter rules on coal-fired power plants, vowing to both defend and build on them. Her stance won plaudits from environmentalists within her party, but unions, a key constituency, are concerned she has yet to say how tougher climate rules will affect coal industry jobs.” (Valerie Volcovici and Amanda Becker, “Clinton Strays From Her Roots As Coal Miner’s Great Granddaughter,” Reuters, 8/10/15)
Clinton’s 2016 Campaign Chair, John Podesta, Was The “Architect” Of The Obama Administration’s Carbon Regulations. “Mrs. Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta, was the architect of Mr. Obama’s signature climate change policy, a set of E.P.A. regulations to cut carbon emissions from power plants. Mrs. Clinton’s new plan appears explicitly designed to build on that plan.” (Trip Gabriel and Coral Davenport, “Hillary Clinton Lays Out Climate Change Plan,” The New York Times¸7/27/15)
In August 2015, Obama Finalized New EPA Regulations That Mandate “Tougher Greenhouse Gas Cuts On American Power Plants.” “Aiming to jolt the rest of the world to action, President Barack Obama moved ahead Sunday with even tougher greenhouse gas cuts on American power plants, setting up a certain confrontation in the courts with energy producers and Republican-led states.” (Josh Lederman, “Climate Change: Obama Orders Steeper Cuts From Power Plants,” The Associated Press, 8/2/15)

• Obama’s EPA Initially Proposed The Regulations In 2014, Which Take Aim At The Country’s Coal-Fired Power Plants By Drastically Cutting Carbon Emissions. “The Obama administration on Monday announced one of the strongest actions ever taken by the United States government to fight climate change, a proposed Environmental Protection Agency regulation to cut carbon pollution from the nation’s power plants 30 percent from 2005 levels by 2030. The regulation takes aim at the largest source of carbon pollution in the United States, the nation’s more than 600 coal-fired power plants.” (Coral Davenport, “Unveiling New Carbon Plan, E.P.A. Focuses On Flexibility,” The New York Times, 6/2/14)

The Final EPA “Clean Power Plan” Rule “Requires A 32 Percent Cut In Power-Plant Carbon-Dioxide Emissions By 2030 From 2005 Levels.” “The limits on carbon emissions are a central component of the U.S.’s pledge to its international partners to cut greenhouse gases by a range of 26% to 28% by 2025, from 2005 levels. The final Environmental Protection Agency rule requires a 32% cut in power-plant carbon-dioxide emissions by 2030 from 2005 levels, which is a more ambitious target than the draft rules proposed last year.” (Colleen McCain Nelson And Amy Harder, “Obama Announces Rule To Cut Carbon Emissions From Power Plants,” The Wall Street Journal, 8/3/15)
The Final EPA Rule, Running More Than 1500 Pages, Explicitly Says That States Can Use Tax Increases “As A Tool For Meeting Their Emissions-Cutting Requirements.”“In a change from the draft plan, the final EPA rule now explicitly says states can use ‘fees’ (i.e., taxes) as a tool for meeting their emissions-cutting requirements. That’s on page 899 of the massive 1,560-page rule. Plans that states craft to comply with the mandate, the rule states, ‘could accommodate imposition by a state of a fee for CO2 emissions from affected [electric generating units], an approach suggested by a number of commenters.’ That language is a rather brief blessing but enough to excite the ad-hoc, Left-Right mix of environmentalists, economists, and a few conservative carbon-tax advocates who have long been swimming upstream at the national and state level.”(Ben Geman, “Obama Climate Plan Revives Talk Of A Carbon Tax,” National Journal, 8/3/15)
Obama’s Plan To Crack Down On Emissions Is “Unprecedented” And “Controversial.” “In finalizing the unprecedented pollution controls, Obama was installing the core of his ambitious and controversial plan to drastically reduce overall U.S. emissions, as he works to secure a legacy on fighting global warming. Yet it will be up to Obama’s successor to implement his plan, which reverberated across the 2016 presidential campaign trail.” (Josh Lederman, “Obama Orders Steeper Greenhouse Gas Cuts From U.S. Power Plants,” The Associated Press, 8/2/15)

• Obama’s Regulations Are Intended To “Wean” The Country Off Coal Produced Energy. “Another key change to the initial proposal marks a major shift for Obama on natural gas, which the president has championed as a ‘bridge fuel’ whose growing use can help the U.S. wean itself off dirtier coal power while ramping up renewable energy capacity. The final version aims to keep the share of natural gas in the nation’s power mix at current levels.” (Josh Lederman, “Obama Orders Steeper Greenhouse Gas Cuts From U.S. Power Plants,” The Associated Press, 8/2/15)

In June 2014, Clinton Praised The Obama Administration’s EPA Rules On Coal-Fired Power Plants And Described The New Rules As “A Very Creative AmericanSolution.” CLINTON: “So part of what President Obama is doing, and I fully support it, is making it clear that the United States is going to act. We’ve done work on mileage, now with the EPA rules on coal-fired plants, and a very creative American solution, having different states figure out what they can do to try to lower their coal-fired emissions. But then the Supreme Court just agreed that the government has the authority to regulate carbon.” (Hillary Clinton, Remarks At The Aspen Ideas Festival, Aspen, CO, 6/30/14)
Clinton Commended Obama For His Actions On Climate Change, Including New EPA Regulations To Limit Carbon Emissions From Coal-Fired Power Plants. “On climate change, Clinton commended President Obama for some recent actions, including new federal regulations limiting carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants. ‘We’re moving,’ Clinton said, ‘but we need to do so much more.’” (Philip Rucker, “Hillary Clinton Tries To Strike The Right Tone On Wealth And Income Inequality,” The Washington Post, 6/30/14)

• But Clinton Also Said She Believed America Needed To Go Further Than Obama’s Actions: “So We Are Moving But We Need To Do So Much More.” CLINTON: “So we are moving but we need to do so much more. But the United States cannot go to an international forum unless we’ve done more. And I think what President Obama is now doing is laying down here is what the United States of America is going to do, what are you going to do and being able to bring people around the table by 2015 so maybe we can stem off what will be a terrible, terrible outcome for our world.” (Hillary Clinton, Remarks At The Aspen Ideas Festival, Aspen, CO, 6/30/14)

Clinton’s “Support Of Obama’s Climate Agenda” Will Be A Liability For Her 2016 Campaign. “If Clinton runs in 2016, her support of Obama’s climate agenda, and push for more policies, would likely put her in the crosshairs of Republicans who call the president’s emissions standards a ‘war on coal’ and energy jobs.” (Laura Barron-Lopez, “Clinton: US Must Do More On Climate,” The Hill, 7/1/14)
Obama’s “Clean Power Plan” Regulations, Finalized In 2015, Will Raise Energy Costs And Kill Jobs:
Based On EPA Data, The American Action Forum Estimated The Obama Administration’s Finalized Regulations On Carbon Emissions Would Close 66 Power Plants, Eliminate 125,800 Coal Jobs, And Cut The Coal Industry In Half. “The final rule for the Clean Power Plan (CPP) was released by the Obama Administration this past August and is a direct attack on the coal industry. According to American Action Forum (AAF) research, the final plan, supported by Sec. Clinton, will shutter 66 power plants and eliminate 125,800 jobs in the coal industry. All of these figures are based on EPA data. The same study shows that using the 2012 baseline for coal generation and projections for 2030 output, the industry could shrink by 48 percent.” (Kimberly VanWhye, “’Revitalizing Coal Communities’: A $30 Billion Consolation Prize”, American Action Forum, 11/13/15)
An Analysis By NERA Economic Consulting Projected That Obama’s Carbon Regulations Will Cost As Much As $292 Billion. “NERA Economic Consulting has produced an analysis of the Clean Power Plan (CPP) recently finalized by the Obama Administration, aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions from new and existing power plants by 32 percent nationwide. NERA’s calculates the CPP could add $29 billion to $39 billion in costs to utilities or as much as $292 billion in added costs between 2022 and 2033, exclusive of added transmission, distribution and natural gas infrastructure costs.” (H. Sterling Burnett, “Economic Analysis of Clean Power Plan Shows High Cost, Minimal Benefits,” The Heartland Institute, 12/2/15)
The U.S. Chamber Of Commerce Estimates That The New Carbon Regulations Will Cause Annual Real Disposable Income To Decline More Than $200 Per Year, Totaling A Loss Of $3,400 By 2030. “Slower economic growth, job losses, and higher energy costs mean that annual real disposable household income will decline on an average of more than $200, with a peak loss of $367 in 2025. In fact, the typical household could lose a total of $3,400 in real disposable income during the modeled 2014-30 timeframe.” (“Assessing The Impact Of Potential New Carbon Regulations In The United States,” Institute For 21st Century Energy, 5/28/14)
As A Result Of These Regulations, The U.S. Chamber Of Commerce Estimates That From 2014 To 2030, On Average, The U.S. Economy Will Have 224,000 Fewer Jobs With A Peak Decline In Employment Of 442,000 Jobs. “On average, from 2014 to 2030, the U.S. economy will have 224,000 fewer jobs (Table ES-3), with a peak decline in employment of 442,000 jobs in 2022 (Figure ES-1). These job losses represent lost opportunities and income for hundreds of thousands of people that can never be recovered.” (“Assessing The Impact Of Potential New Carbon Regulations In The United States,” Institute For 21st Century Energy, 5/28/14)
“The Obama Administration Estimated The Emissions Limits Will Cost $8.4 Billion Annually By 2030.” (Josh Lederman, “Obama Orders Steeper Greenhouse Gas Cuts From U.S. Power Plants,” The Associated Press, 8/2/15)

• Industry Experts Say That The Regulations “Will Require Billions Of Dollars In New Investments.” “Industry experts say cutting carbon emissions 32% by 2030 will require billions of dollars in investments for new transmission lines that accommodate more solar and wind power and new pipelines to feed natural-gas-fired power plants, as coal becomes less important as a fuel.” (Amy Harder, Colleen McCain Nelson and Rebecca Smith, “Obama’s New Climate-Change Regulations To Alter, Challenge Industry,” The Wall Street Journal, 8/2/15)

The Obama Administration Claims The Plan Will Lower Energy Costs, But It Does So By Assuming People Will Simply Use Less Energy, An Assumption Challenged By Energy Providers. “Although the administration predicts the plan will actually lower the average U.S. energy bill by almost $85 in 2030, companies that produce and distribute electricity aren’t buying it. The savings come largely from increased use of wind, power and hydro plants, which operate at a cost of close to zero after they’re installed but cost a lot to get up and running. The administration is also counting on people’s power bills going because they’ll simply use less power as a result of efficiency measures. The National Association of Manufacturers, the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, the National Mining Association, the American Energy Alliance and the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association all predicted the rule would drive electricity bills up.” (“Winners And Losers Under Obama’s Stricter Power Plant Limits,” The Associated Press, 8/3/15)
Energy Executives Worry That The New Rules Will “Result In Shutting Power Plants” Leading To Higher Costs For Consumers. “Executives worry about the EPA plan’s cost, in part because it could result in shutting power plants that aren’t yet paid off, Mr. Akins said, meaning consumers will have to pay for assets that aren’t providing benefits. Other executives said consumers may be able to trim their electricity use and keep their bills flat—or even reduce them.” (Amy Harder, Colleen McCain, and Rebecca Smith, “Obama’s New Climate-Change Regulations To Alter, Challenge Industry,” The Wall Street Journal, 8/2/15)

 

[superbeets]

[h=6]AUGUST 12, 2016 -[/h][h=1]ICYMI: TOP JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL WARNED AGAINST IRAN RANSOM PAYMENT[/h]Please read the following excerpts “Senior Justice Official Raised Objections to Iran Cash Payment” by Devlin Barrett, The Wall Street Journal, 8/12/16
The head of the national security division at the Justice Department was among the agency’s senior officials who objected topaying Iran hundreds of millions of dollars in cashat the same time that Tehran was releasing American prisoners, according to people familiar with the discussions.
John Carlin,a Senate-confirmed administration appointee, raised concerns when the State Department notified Justice officials of its plan to deliver to Iran a planeful of cash, saying it would be viewed as a ransom payment, these people said. A number of other high-ranking Justice officials voiced similar concerns as the negotiations proceeded, they said.
…
The objection of senior Justice Department officials was that Iranian officials were likely to view the $400 million payment as ransom, thereby undercutting a longstanding U.S. policy that the government doesn’t pay ransom for American hostages, these people said. The policy is based on a concern that paying ransom could encourage more Americans to become targets for hostage-takers.
Mr. Carlin, as head of the division in charge of counterterrorism and intelligence, is one of the highest-profile figures at the department. That he and other senior figures raised alarms underscores how much pushback the State Department proposal provoked.
…
In his remarks, the president didn’t mention the objections raised by his own appointees within the Justice Department, where, according to people familiar with the discussions, many officials raised alarms that the timing of the cash payment would look like ransom.
…
Last week, Sen.Charles Grassley(R., Iowa), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, asked the Justice Department to explain which officials in the department objected to the payment. The department hasn’t yet responded to that request.

 

[superbeets]

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 5hErie, PA
Thank you Erie, Pennsylvania! Together we will #MakeAmericaGreatAgain!

 

[superbeets]

 

[superbeets]

 

[superbeets]

 

[superbeets]

 

[superbeets]

NEPA for TRUMP ‏@nepafortrump Jul 21
#TeamTrumpPA will SWING PA from #CrookedHillary BLUE to @realDonaldTrump RED! #AmericaFirst #TrumpPence16

Donald J. Trump, Official Team Trump, Paul Manafort and 7 others

 

[superbeets]

NEPA for TRUMP Retweeted
​

​

​

Flavius Aetius ‏@StupidBoomers 22h22 hours ago
They Brought home LOTS of #GOLD

too-Corrupt GREEDY & Criminal Career Politicians-Pure Evil https://twitter.com/NBCOlympics/status/763195228756987904 …

​

​

​

 

[The Guesser]

The idiot Drumpf again implying fixes and violent remedies when he loses Penn, a reliable Blue state for years in POTUS Elections, where he trails by 9+ in the RCP averages:

Trump: If Clinton wins Pennsylvania, she cheated
By Rachel Chason, CNN
Updated 9:33 PM ET, Fri August 12, 2016
Recent polls show Clinton with a 10-point lead in the state
(CNN)Donald Trump declared Friday that there's only one way he could lose the state of Pennsylvania: if he's cheated out of it.


"We're going to watch Pennsylvania. Go down to certain areas and watch and study and make sure other people don't come in and vote five times," he said at a rally in Altoona, Pennsylvania. "If you do that, we're not going to lose. The only way we can lose, in my opinion -- I really mean this, Pennsylvania -- is if cheating goes on."
Trump said that Republican leaders in the state "are very concerned" about the possibility of cheating -- adding that "we have to call up law enforcement, and we have to have the sheriffs and the police chiefs and everybody watching."
Hillary Clinton's lead in the polls in Pennsylvania is solid -- a Quinnipiac survey of likely voters released Tuesday found Clinton leading Trump 52% to 42%. But both candidates are devoting significant resources to the state, which has a base of working class voters that Trump's campaign hopes could work in his favor.
RELATED: Clinton, Trump battle for Pennsylvania
Trump, who campaigned earlier Friday in Erie, Pennsylvania, said he "knows the state very well" and knows Clinton "can't beat what's happening here."
Unless there's cheating.
"The only way they can beat it, in my opinion -- and I mean this 100% -- if in certain sections of the state, they cheat," he said.
Trump's comments Friday echoed -- but went even further than -- his statements last week in Ohio that he's "afraid the election is going to be rigged."
RELATED: Trump: 'I'm afraid the election's going to be rigged'
Pennsylvania does not require voters in the state to show photo identification -- which Trump said he finds "shocking."
Ben Carson, who supports Trump, told CNN's Erin Burnett that the focus should be on how to make sure there is no voter fraud -- which he noted would be good for both parties. He also acknowledged he might not have used the words as Trump, his former Republican primary rival.
"I would've said it in a different way. I would've said, 'There have been some irregularities and we want to make sure that those don't occur.'"
Road to 270: CNN's new electoral college map
At his first rally of the day, Trump put his dislike of the media in harsher terms than usual -- calling journalists "the lowest form of life."
"I tell you, the lowest," he said. "They are the lowest form of humanity."

 

[Dafinch]

The idiot Drumpf again implying fixes and violent remedies when he loses Penn, a reliable Blue state for years in POTUS Elections, where he trails by 9+ in the RCP averages:

Trump: If Clinton wins Pennsylvania, she cheated
By Rachel Chason, CNN
Updated 9:33 PM ET, Fri August 12, 2016
Recent polls show Clinton with a 10-point lead in the state
(CNN)Donald Trump declared Friday that there's only one way he could lose the state of Pennsylvania: if he's cheated out of it.


"We're going to watch Pennsylvania. Go down to certain areas and watch and study and make sure other people don't come in and vote five times," he said at a rally in Altoona, Pennsylvania. "If you do that, we're not going to lose. The only way we can lose, in my opinion -- I really mean this, Pennsylvania -- is if cheating goes on."
Trump said that Republican leaders in the state "are very concerned" about the possibility of cheating -- adding that "we have to call up law enforcement, and we have to have the sheriffs and the police chiefs and everybody watching."
Hillary Clinton's lead in the polls in Pennsylvania is solid -- a Quinnipiac survey of likely voters released Tuesday found Clinton leading Trump 52% to 42%. But both candidates are devoting significant resources to the state, which has a base of working class voters that Trump's campaign hopes could work in his favor.
RELATED: Clinton, Trump battle for Pennsylvania
Trump, who campaigned earlier Friday in Erie, Pennsylvania, said he "knows the state very well" and knows Clinton "can't beat what's happening here."
Unless there's cheating.
"The only way they can beat it, in my opinion -- and I mean this 100% -- if in certain sections of the state, they cheat," he said.
Trump's comments Friday echoed -- but went even further than -- his statements last week in Ohio that he's "afraid the election is going to be rigged."
RELATED: Trump: 'I'm afraid the election's going to be rigged'
Pennsylvania does not require voters in the state to show photo identification -- which Trump said he finds "shocking."
Ben Carson, who supports Trump, told CNN's Erin Burnett that the focus should be on how to make sure there is no voter fraud -- which he noted would be good for both parties. He also acknowledged he might not have used the words as Trump, his former Republican primary rival.
"I would've said it in a different way. I would've said, 'There have been some irregularities and we want to make sure that those don't occur.'"
Road to 270: CNN's new electoral college map
At his first rally of the day, Trump put his dislike of the media in harsher terms than usual -- calling journalists "the lowest form of life."
"I tell you, the lowest," he said. "They are the lowest form of humanity."

HEY, "Libtard," go get your OWN scoop(note time stamp on post)::nohead::aktion033:missingtecheersgif:thumbsup2::money:

http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1059532

 

[The Guesser]

HEY, "Libtard," go get your OWN scoop(note time stamp on post)::nohead::aktion033:missingtecheersgif:thumbsup2::money:

http://www.therxforum.com/showthread.php?t=1059532

Ya got me Finchy. I didn't notice your thread when I posted this. Good job. It deserves it's own thread. :toast:

 

[superbeets]

• SHARE PICTURE

​

+3


U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, a prosecutor who made a name for himself in the midst of the the financial crisis by acting on fraud and public corruption cases, is reportedly probing the Clinton Foundation

 

[superbeets]

• SHARE PICTURE

​

+3


Bharara's pursuit of insider trading cases beginning in 2009 earned him a Time magazine cover and the title of 'top cop' to Wall Street. He's taken down big banks and lawmakers

 

[superbeets]

• SHARE PICTURE

​

+3


MORE TROUBLE FOR HILLARY? Hillary Clinton escaped prosecution for her conduct during her tenure at the State Department - her family's foundation may not be so fortunate

 

[superbeets]

[h=6]- AUGUST 12, 2016 -[/h][h=1]TRUMP ADVISER: PUTTING OUR NATIONAL ECONOMIC INTEREST FIRST – A NEW APPROACH TO TRADE AGREEMENTS[/h]Business Insider
America’s robust economy was founded on the idea that America’s interests take precedent over other countries.
This approach led to a booming, wealthy American economy.
In the past 70 years, America has retreated from this idea and taken a globalist position. This has led to unsuccessful trade deals that benefit other countries. Until we return to our original policy of putting America first, our economy cannot return to what it once was.
Barrack's suggestions include:

• Fortify and Strengthen TPA
• Enhance TAA
• Negotiate Bilateral Agreements
• No Trade Bureaucracies and Definitive Responsibilities
• Soften Geopolitical Agendas to Favor Economic Policy
• No Currency Manipulations

 

[superbeets]

[h=6]- AUGUST 11, 2016 -[/h][h=1]TRUMP IS RIGHT ON BLACK YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT[/h]Red Alert Politics
Donald Trump continues to educate the public on the failings of the Obama-Clinton administration. His most recent statements have pointed out the alarming statistic that 58% of African American youth are unemployed.
“The GOP nominee’s economic advisor said to ABC News that the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (which reports black youth unemployment numbers at 25.7%) is deceiving the public because they manipulate the age range considered ‘youth.’"
This statistic raises a red flag as Hillary Clinton will continue the Obama policies that created such high unemployment among African Americans in the first place. Donald Trump has made job creation a cornerstone of his campaign and this message is getting through to the African American community.

 

[roadreeler57]

Trump beating crooked Hillary by a wide margin......Vote
http://nbcpoll.com/nbc-poll-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-3/

 

[The Guesser]

BOROWITZ REPORT


TRUMP BLASTS MEDIA FOR REPORTING THINGS HE SAYS


By Andy Borowitz

, AUGUST 11, 2016


(The Borowitz Report)—The Republican Presidential nominee, Donald Trump, tore into the media on Thursday for what he called its “extremely unfair practice” of reporting the things he says.
“I’ll say something at a rally and I look out and see all these TV cameras taking every word down,” Trump told Fox News’s Sean Hannity. “No one in politics has ever been subjected to this kind of treatment.”
“It’s unbelievable and, frankly, very unethical,” he added.
At a rally in Florida, the candidate lashed out at a TV cameraman whom he caught in the act of recording his words for broadcasting purposes.
“Look at him over there, picking up everything I’m saying, folks,” Trump shouted. “Get him out of here.”@)
In his interview with Fox, Trump hinted that he might drop out of this fall’s televised Presidential debates if the media continues its practice of reporting the things he says.hno:
“I’ve always said that I would be willing to debate if I’m treated fairly,” Trump told Hannity. “But if the media keeps recording everything I say, word for word, and then playing it back so that everyone in the country hears exactly what I said, I would consider that very, very unfair.”;+)-


Andy Borowitz is a New York Times best-selling author and a comedian who has written for The New Yorker since 1998. He writes the Borowitz Report for newyorker.com