Hilarious TRUMP Lovers

[superbeets]

I just delivered a major economic speech with concrete solutions to get our country back on track.

...But a group of left-wing protesters interrupted me over ten times in an attempt to get us off message.

I have news for them: IT DIDN’T WORK!

We stayed on message and delivered our positive platform to America.

But the protests are only going to get louder, the attacks will get nastier, and the lies will get more vicious. We need all hands on deck to cut through the noise, and get our message straight to the American voter.



Between now and Election Day, we will stay on message, and prove that there is NOTHING Hillary’s protesters can do to stop our movement to Make America Great Again!

I need your help now more than ever fighting back against our distractors and ensuring our America First message is heard loud and clear.

There are only 3 MONTHS left until Election Day. From here on out, it’s a sprint to the finish line.


Thank you,

Donald J. Trump

 

[superbeets]

 

[superbeets]

 

[vidswaps]

:missingte:missingte:missingte "TITTIES"BENEDICT DONALD.

 

[roadreeler57]

[h=5]Donald J. Trump at Peterbilt of Bristol.[/h]48 mins ·







I am leaving Peterbilt now, where I met with coal miners and leaders from the Virginia coal industry. I assure you - those out of work down here -- will be back to work under a Trump Administration! -DJT

 

[roadreeler57]

For the Libtards here that just pretend not to get it....

 

[roadreeler57]

(Comment from Trumps FB page)
John Taylor If you jumped the fence at the DNC you get arrested.......if you cross the border from Mexico you get invited to the DNC!

 

[superbeets]

[h=6]- AUGUST 10, 2016 -[/h][h=1]NEW VIDEO: TRUMP WILL DEFEND COAL COUNTRY[/h]

Hillary Clinton’s Promise To “Put A Lot Of Coal Miners” Out Of Work Will Not Be Forgotten In Coal Country

​

Clinton’s 2016 Campaign Has Embraced Obama’s Anti-Coal Policies:



At A March 2016 Debate, Clinton Discussed Her Coal Communities Plan, Saying It Was Needed Because “We’re Going To Put A Lot Of Coal Miners And Coal Companies Out Of Business.”CLINTON: “So for example, I’m the only candidate which has a policy about how to bring economic opportunity using clean renewable energy as the key into coal country. Because we’re going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business, right, Tim? And we’re going to make it clear that we don’t want to forget those people. Those people labored in those mines for generations, losing their health, often losing their lives to turn on our lights and power our factories. Now we’ve got to move away from coal and all the other fossil fuels, but I don’t want to move away from the people who did the best they could to produce the energy that we relied on.”(Hillary Clinton,CNN Democratic Presidential Candidate Town Hall, 3/13/16)



Clinton Has Vowed To Defend And “Build On” Obama’s Anti-Coal “Clean Power Plan” If Elected President, Calling It A “Significant Step Forward.”“Democratic front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton pledged Sunday that if elected she will build on a new White House clean energy program and defend it against those she called ‘Republican doubters and defeatists.’ Clinton was the first 2016 candidate to respond to the ambitious plan that President Obama will debut on Monday. Details of the program, which aims to cut greenhouse-gas pollution, were released over the weekend. The new regulation will require every state to reduce emissions from coal-burning power plants. In a statement Sunday, Clinton called the plan ‘a significant step forward in meeting the urgent threat of climate change.’”(Anne Gearan, “Hillary Clinton Promises To Build On Obama Climate Plan As President,”The Washington Post, 8/2/15)



“Clinton Called Obama’s Plan ‘The Floor, Not The Ceiling,’ And Said She Would Go Further.”(Anne Gearan, “Hillary Clinton Promises To Build On Obama Climate Plan As President,”The Washington Post, 8/2/15)



Obama’s Regulations Are Intended To “Wean” The Country Off Coal Produced Energy.“Another key change to the initial proposal marks a major shift for Obama on natural gas, which the president has championed as a ‘bridge fuel’ whose growing use can help the U.S. wean itself off dirtier coal power while ramping up renewable energy capacity. The final version aims to keep the share of natural gas in the nation’s power mix at current levels.”(Josh Lederman, “Obama Orders Steeper Greenhouse Gas Cuts From U.S. Power Plants,”The Associated Press, 8/2/15)



During A November 2015 “Environmentalists For Hillary” Event, Clinton Said “We Have To Move Away From Coal. Everybody Understands That, There Is No Doubt About It.”CLINTON: “I also want to say a special word about coal. We have to move away from coal. Everybody understands that. There’s no doubt about it.”(Hillary Clinton,Remarks At An Environmentalists For Hillary Event, Nashua, NH, 11/9/15)



Clinton’s Vowed To “Put A Lot Of Coal Miners And Coal Companies Out Of Business” In March, Drawing The Ire Of Coal State Democrats:



Clinton’s Town Hall Remarks “Caught The Attention Of Coal Country.”“Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton caught the attention of coal country for her statement during a CNN town hall last Sunday when she said, ‘We’re going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business.’”(Hoppy Kercheval, “Clinton’s Kinnsley Gaffe,”West Virginia MetroNews, 3/17/16)



The Roanoke[Virginia]TimesEditorial: “Clinton May Be The First Candidate To Brag She’s Going To Put An Entire Industry Out Of Work.”“Clinton may be the first candidate to brag she’s going to put an entire industry out of work.”(Editorial, “Our View: Clinton’s Coal Gaffe?,”The Roanoke[Virginia]Times, 3/17/16)



West Virginia Political Commentator Hoppy Kercheval: Clinton’s Comments “Reaffirm What Coal Industry Supporters Fear About Clinton,” That She Will Continue Obama’s Policies That “Make It Impossible To Mine And Burn Coal.”“The comment reaffirmed what coal industry supporters fear about Clinton, that she will continue down the path set forth by the Obama administration of using executive authority to make it impossible to mine and burn coal.”(Hoppy Kercheval, “Clinton’s Kinsley Gaffe,”West Virginia MetroNews, 3/17/16)



The President Of The National Mining Association, Hal Quinn, Said It Was “Deeply Troubling” To Hear Clinton “Boast” That She Wants “To Destroy The Livelihoods Of Tens Of Thousands Of Hard-Working Americans.”“The National Mining Association joined in. Hal Quinn, the group’s president, said it is ‘surpassing strange and deeply troubling to hear prominent presidential candidates boast of their determination in office to destroy the livelihoods of tens of thousands of hard-working Americans.’”(Timothy Cama, “GOP, Industry Backlash After Clinton’s Coal Comments,”The Hill, 3/14/16)



West Virginia Democrat Senator Joe Manchin Was “Livid” After Hearing Of Clinton’s “Horrific” Comments, And “Was So Appalled He Was Prepared To Cut Political Ties” With Clinton.“Joe Manchin was livid. The Democratic senator from West Virginia had seen Hillary Clinton tell a televised town hall audience that if she became president, ‘we’re going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business,’ in a broader answer about creating jobs in areas hurt by the decline of the coal industry. Coal miners have been struggling in his home state and Mr. Manchin was so appalled he was prepared to cut political ties with the Democratic presidential front-runner. ‘It was horrific,’ he said in an interview Thursday.”(Peter Nicholas, “West Virginia’s Joe Manchin Shaken By Hillary Clinton’s ‘Horrific’ Coal Comment,”The Wall Street Journal’sWashington Wire, 3/25/16)



Alison Lundergan Grimes, Clinton Friend And Kentucky’s Democrat Secretary Of State, Said She Was “Very Disappointed” In Clinton’s Anti-Coal Comments. “‘I was very disappointed to hear the comments that came out of the debate,’ said Alison Lundergan Grimes, Kentucky’s secretary of state and a close friend of the Clinton family who received their endorsement during her unsuccessful challenge to [Senator Mitch] McConnell in 2014. ‘My hope is she’ll have a chance to clarify those comments, comments that as I said were completely out of line with personal conversations that I have had with her.’”(Adam Beam and Jonathan Mattise, “Facing Backlash, Clinton Says Coal Still Has A Future,”The Associated Press¸ 3/14/16)



Clinton Has Heaped Praise On Obama’s New EPA Regulations To Limit Carbon Emissions From Coal-Fired Power Plants:



Clinton Has Vowed To “Defend And Build On” The Obama Administration’s Anti-Coal Regulations, Which Has Earned Her Support From Environmentalists But Led To Concerns From Labor Unions. “Clinton was quick last week to praise President Obama’s stricter rules on coal-fired power plants, vowing to both defend and build on them. Her stance won plaudits from environmentalists within her party, but unions, a key constituency, are concerned she has yet to say how tougher climate rules will affect coal industry jobs.”(Valerie Volcovici and Amanda Becker, “Clinton Strays From Her Roots As Coal Miner’s Great Granddaughter,”Reuters, 8/10/15)



Clinton’s 2016 Campaign Chair, John Podesta, Was The “Architect” Of The Obama Administration’s Carbon Regulations.“Mrs. Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta, was the architect of Mr. Obama’s signature climate change policy, a set of E.P.A. regulations to cut carbon emissions from power plants. Mrs. Clinton’s new plan appears explicitly designed to build on that plan.”(Trip Gabriel and Coral Davenport, “Hillary Clinton Lays Out Climate Change Plan,”The New York Times¸7/27/15)



In August 2015, Obama Finalized New EPA Regulations That Mandate “Tougher Greenhouse Gas Cuts On American Power Plants.”“Aiming to jolt the rest of the world to action, President Barack Obama moved ahead Sunday with even tougher greenhouse gas cuts on American power plants, setting up a certain confrontation in the courts with energy producers and Republican-led states.”(Josh Lederman, “Climate Change: Obama Orders Steeper Cuts From Power Plants,”The Associated Press, 8/2/15)



Obama’s EPA Initially Proposed The Regulations In 2014, Which Take Aim At The Country’s Coal-Fired Power Plants By Drastically Cutting Carbon Emissions.“The Obama administration on Monday announced one of the strongest actions ever taken by the United States government to fight climate change, a proposed Environmental Protection Agency regulation to cut carbon pollution from the nation’s power plants 30 percent from 2005 levels by 2030. The regulation takes aim at the largest source of carbon pollution in the United States, the nation’s more than 600 coal-fired power plants.”(Coral Davenport, “Unveiling New Carbon Plan, E.P.A. Focuses On Flexibility,”The New York Times, 6/2/14)



The Final EPA “Clean Power Plan” Rule “Requires A 32 Percent Cut In Power-Plant Carbon-Dioxide Emissions By 2030 From 2005 Levels.”“The limits on carbon emissions are a central component of the U.S.’s pledge to its international partners to cut greenhouse gases by a range of 26% to 28% by 2025, from 2005 levels. The final Environmental Protection Agency rule requires a 32% cut in power-plant carbon-dioxide emissions by 2030 from 2005 levels, which is a more ambitious target than the draft rules proposed last year.”(Colleen McCain Nelson And Amy Harder, “Obama Announces Rule To Cut Carbon Emissions From Power Plants,”The Wall Street Journal, 8/3/15)



The Final EPA Rule, Running More Than 1500 Pages, Explicitly Says That States Can Use Tax Increases “As A Tool For Meeting Their Emissions-Cutting Requirements.”“In a change from the draft plan, the final EPA rule now explicitly says states can use ‘fees’ (i.e., taxes) as a tool for meeting their emissions-cutting requirements. That’s on page 899 of the massive 1,560-page rule. Plans that states craft to comply with the mandate, the rule states, ‘could accommodate imposition by a state of a fee for CO2 emissions from affected [electric generating units], an approach suggested by a number of commenters.’ That language is a rather brief blessing but enough to excite the ad-hoc, Left-Right mix of environmentalists, economists, and a few conservative carbon-tax advocates who have long been swimming upstream at the national and state level.”(Ben Geman, “Obama Climate Plan Revives Talk Of A Carbon Tax,”National Journal, 8/3/15)



Obama’s Plan To Crack Down On Emissions Is “Unprecedented” And “Controversial.”“In finalizing the unprecedented pollution controls, Obama was installing the core of his ambitious and controversial plan to drastically reduce overall U.S. emissions, as he works to secure a legacy on fighting global warming. Yet it will be up to Obama’s successor to implement his plan, which reverberated across the 2016 presidential campaign trail.”(Josh Lederman, “Obama Orders Steeper Greenhouse Gas Cuts From U.S. Power Plants,”The Associated Press, 8/2/15)



Obama’s Regulations Are Intended To “Wean” The Country Off Coal Produced Energy.“Another key change to the initial proposal marks a major shift for Obama on natural gas, which the president has championed as a ‘bridge fuel’ whose growing use can help the U.S. wean itself off dirtier coal power while ramping up renewable energy capacity. The final version aims to keep the share of natural gas in the nation’s power mix at current levels.”(Josh Lederman, “Obama Orders Steeper Greenhouse Gas Cuts From U.S. Power Plants,”The Associated Press, 8/2/15)



In June 2014, Clinton Praised The Obama Administration’s EPA Rules On Coal-Fired Power Plants And Described The New Rules As “A Very Creative AmericanSolution.”CLINTON: “So part of what President Obama is doing, and I fully support it, is making it clear that the United States is going to act. We’ve done work on mileage, now with the EPA rules on coal-fired plants, and a very creative American solution, having different states figure out what they can do to try to lower their coal-fired emissions. But then the Supreme Court just agreed that the government has the authority to regulate carbon.”(Hillary Clinton,Remarks At The Aspen Ideas Festival, Aspen, CO, 6/30/14)



Clinton Commended Obama For His Actions On Climate Change, Including New EPA Regulations To Limit Carbon Emissions From Coal-Fired Power Plants.“On climate change, Clinton commended President Obama for some recent actions, including new federal regulations limiting carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants. ‘We’re moving,’ Clinton said, ‘but we need to do so much more.’”(Philip Rucker, “Hillary Clinton Tries To Strike The Right Tone On Wealth And Income Inequality,”The Washington Post, 6/30/14)



But Clinton Also Said She Believed America Needed To Go Further Than Obama’s Actions: “So We Are Moving But We Need To Do So Much More.”CLINTON: “So we are moving but we need to do so much more. But the United States cannot go to an international forum unless we’ve done more. And I think what President Obama is now doing is laying down here is what the United States of America is going to do, what are you going to do and being able to bring people around the table by 2015 so maybe we can stem off what will be a terrible, terrible outcome for our world.”(Hillary Clinton,Remarks At The Aspen Ideas Festival, Aspen, CO, 6/30/14)



Clinton’s “Support Of Obama’s Climate Agenda” Will Be A Liability For Her 2016 Campaign. “If Clinton runs in 2016, her support of Obama’s climate agenda, and push for more policies, would likely put her in the crosshairs of Republicans who call the president’s emissions standards a ‘war on coal’ and energy jobs.”(Laura Barron-Lopez, “Clinton: US Must Do More On Climate,”The Hill,7/1/14)

​

 

[superbeets]

[h=6]- AUGUST 10, 2016 -[/h][h=1]CLINTON’S NEWEST EMAIL SCANDAL EXPOSES PAY FOR PLAY CONNECTIONS[/h][h=4]Ron Fournier: Clinton Emails Blur The Lines Between Their Political And Personal Lives[/h]
.

 

[superbeets]

[h=4]MSNBC’s Welker: Emails “Raise Questions” About Clinton Foundation, State Dept Ties, Favors Done For Donors[/h]

 

[superbeets]

[h=6]- AUGUST 10, 2016 -[/h][h=1]ICYMI: RUDY GIULIANI CALLS CLINTON CORRUPTION “ILLEGAL”[/h]

 

[superbeets]

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 14m14 minutes agoFlorida, USA
Thank you Fort Lauderdale, Florida. #MakeAmericaGreatAgain

 

[superbeets]

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 3h3 hours ago
Reuters just announced that Secret Service never spoke to me or my campaign. Made up story by @CNN is a hoax. Totally dishonest.

 

[vidswaps]

 

[vitterd]

Brilliant. So funny.

 

[Dafinch]

:missingte:missingte:missingte "TITTIES"BENEDICT DONALD.

Aww, shit, vidswaps, it's been removed already, what did it show? That he spent a small fortune on his mail order bride's rubber titties?

 

[vidswaps]

 

[superbeets]

[h=6]- AUGUST 11, 2016 -[/h][h=1]TRUMP IS RIGHT ON BLACK YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT[/h]Red Alert Politics
Donald Trump continues to educate the public on the failings of the Obama-Clinton administration. His most recent statements have pointed out the alarming statistic that 58% of African American youth are unemployed.
“The GOP nominee’s economic advisor said to ABC News that the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (which reports black youth unemployment numbers at 25.7%) is deceiving the public because they manipulate the age range considered ‘youth.’"
This statistic raises a red flag as Hillary Clinton will continue the Obama policies that created such high unemployment among African Americans in the first place. Donald Trump has made job creation a cornerstone of his campaign and this message is getting through to the African American community.

 

[superbeets]

[h=6]- AUGUST 11, 2016 -[/h][h=1]CLINTON ATTACKS STRUGGLING PARENTS WITH WILD LIES ON TRUMP’S PROPOSED CHILDCARE REFORMS[/h]"In a disturbing attack on middle class parents seeking to provide for their children, Hillary Clinton has lied wildly about Mr. Trump's tax deduction for working families. The deduction is strictly capped at the average cost of childcare to target the benefit to working and middle class families, and lower-income workers can deduct it from their payroll taxes. Crucially, it is also available to stay-at-home parents. This is just the first in a series of reforms the campaign will outline in more detail in coming days to provide targeted relief to low and middle income families, especially those most in need." - Stephen Miller, National Policy Director

---

Mr. Trump’s said that we would allow “parents to fully deduct the average cost of childcare spending from their taxes.”

• Every parent, whether they itemize deductions or use the standard deduction, will be able to subtract the average cost of childcare from their income when determining tax liability.
• This “above-the-line” deduction or exclusion from income will provide the greatest relief to middle class families who struggle to pay childcare costs that sometimes exceed $1,000 per month.
• The deduction will be limited to the average cost of childcare for the age of the child.
• To provide benefits to lower-income taxpayers who may not benefit from the deduction, the plan also allows parents to exclude childcare expenses from half of their payroll taxes—increasing their paycheck income each week.

 

[superbeets]

[h=6]- AUGUST 11, 2016 -[/h][h=1]THE NON-PARTISAN TAX FOUNDATION SAYS CLINTON’S PLAN WILL COST JOBS AND SHRINK THE GDP[/h]According To Analysis By The Tax Foundation, Clinton’s Tax Proposals Would “Reduce The Economy’s Size By 1 Percent.” “According to the Tax Foundation’s Taxes and Growth Model, Hillary Clinton’s tax plan would reduce the economy’s size by 1 percent in the long run.” (Kyle Pomerleau and Michael Schuyler, “Details And Analysis Of Hillary Clinton’s Tax Proposals,” Tax Foundation, 1/26/16)
According To Analysis By The Tax Foundation, Clinton’s Tax Proposals Would Result In “311,000 Fewer Full-Time Equivalent Jobs.” “The plan would lead to 0.8 percent lower wages, a 2.8 percent smaller capital stock, and 311,000 fewer full-time equivalent jobs. The smaller economy results from somewhat higher marginal tax rates on capital and labor income.” (Kyle Pomerleau and Michael Schuyler, “Details And Analysis Of Hillary Clinton’s Tax Proposals,” Tax Foundation, 1/26/16)
According To Analysis By The Tax Foundation, Clinton’s Tax Proposals Would “Lead To 0.8 Percent Lower Wages. “The plan would lead to 0.8 percent lower wages, a 2.8 percent smaller capital stock, and 311,000 fewer full-time equivalent jobs. The smaller economy results from somewhat higher marginal tax rates on capital and labor income.” (Kyle Pomerleau and Michael Schuyler, “Details And Analysis Of Hillary Clinton’s Tax Proposals,” Tax Foundation, 1/26/16)
When Accounting For The Economic Impact Of Clinton’s Plan, Clinton’s Tax Proposals Would Reduce American’s After-Tax Incomes By An Average Of 1.3 Percent. “On a dynamic basis, the plan would reduce after-tax incomes by an average of 1.3 percent. All deciles would see a reduction in after-tax income of at least 0.9 percent over the long-term. Taxpayers that fall in the bottom nine deciles would see their after-tax incomes decline by between 0.9 and 1 percent.” (Kyle Pomerleau and Michael Schuyler, “Details And Analysis Of Hillary Clinton’s Tax Proposals,” Tax Foundation, 1/26/16)
American’s That Are In The Bottom 90% Of Taxpayers Would See A Reduction In After-Tax Income Of At Least 0.9 Percent Over The Long-Term. “On a dynamic basis, the plan would reduce after-tax incomes by an average of 1.3 percent. All deciles would see a reduction in after-tax income of at least 0.9 percent over the long-term. Taxpayers that fall in the bottom nine deciles would see their after-tax incomes decline by between 0.9 and 1 percent.” (Kyle Pomerleau and Michael Schuyler, “Details And Analysis Of Hillary Clinton’s Tax Proposals,” Tax Foundation, 1/26/16)