Hilarious TRUMP Lovers

[The Guesser]

You are such a renowned historian on these matters so I don't have to remind you while the nominations
are still in doubt these candidate vs. candidate polls mean actually nothing. Bernie beats all Republicans
in every matchup, you know that means nothing. Why you even bring these silly so-called one on one abstract
possibilities up for discussion is beyond me!

Carter was ahead of Reagan in March/April 1980 & Dulakis was ahead of Bush #1 during that same time frame
in 1988. And don't forget Perrot 35%, Bush 34% Bill Clinton 24% in early spring of 1992.

Funny how you Mind Numbed Drumpfettes tout polls when they're in your favor as the be all and end all, and totally dismiss them when they show a different picture. No Surprise.
Hey NB, how about Drumpf wanting to punish women for having an abortion, being in favor of Japan and South Korea, and Saudi Arabia getting Nukes, and not taking Nuking Europe off the table. I bet you're proud. I hope the idiot wasn't spouting such nonsense when you guys were picking up Co-eds in the 70's on the Upper East Side.

 

[superbeets]

You are such a renowned historian on these matters so I don't have to remind you while the nominations
are still in doubt these candidate vs. candidate polls mean actually nothing. Bernie beats all Republicans
in every matchup, you know that means nothing. Why you even bring these silly so-called one on one abstract
possibilities up for discussion is beyond me!

Carter was ahead of Reagan in March/April 1980 & Dulakis was ahead of Bush #1 during that same time frame
in 1988. And don't forget Perrot 35%, Bush 34% Bill Clinton 24% in early spring of 1992.

He post them because he believes it is negative to Trump. If Trump was in the + he would not be posting them.


He believes

The Guesser12-08-2015, 05:37 AM

"We are living through Germany late 1920's. "

 

[superbeets]

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 4m4 minutes ago
Just had a very nice meeting with @Reince Priebus and the @GOP. Looking forward to bringing the Party together --- and it will happen!

 

[Dave007inVegas]

You are such a renowned historian on these matters so I don't have to remind you while the nominations
are still in doubt these candidate vs. candidate polls mean actually nothing. Bernie beats all Republicans
in every matchup, you know that means nothing. Why you even bring these silly so-called one on one abstract
possibilities up for discussion is beyond me!

Carter was ahead of Reagan in March/April 1980 & Dulakis was ahead of Bush #1 during that same time frame
in 1988. And don't forget Perrot 35%, Bush 34% Bill Clinton 24% in early spring of 1992.

Ain't it the truth.

 

[vitterd]

Funny how you Mind Numbed Drumpfettes tout polls when they're in your favor as the be all and end all, and totally dismiss them when they show a different picture. No Surprise.
Hey NB, how about Drumpf wanting to punish women for having an abortion, being in favor of Japan and South Korea, and Saudi Arabia getting Nukes, and not taking Nuking Europe off the table. I bet you're proud. I hope the idiot wasn't spouting such nonsense when you guys were picking up Co-eds in the 70's on the Upper East Side.

So true.....how many times have Trump and his supporters pointed to the polls. Speaking of polls.....his general election numbers against Hillary are in free fall right now.

 

[superbeets]

US Election 2016: Trump card could secure victory over Clinton in game of demographics

Both likely major party nominees are viewed unfavourably by a majority of the electorate

• Rupert Cornwell Washington
• @IndyVoices
• Wednesday 16 March 2016

With Hillary Clinton – barring an email-related bombshell from the FBI – now virtually certain to be the Democratic nominee, and Donald Trump heavy favourite to be her Republican opponent in November, both campaigns are now focusing on a vital aspect of the race: how to win the demographics game that decides US presidential elections. And in this remarkable 2016 cycle, some old certainties may no longer hold.

Her wins in Florida, Ohio, North Carolina and Illinois on Tuesday leave no doubt Mrs Clinton is in firm command of the key Democratic constituencies of blacks, Hispanics and women voters. That is likely to remain the case this autumn, if Mr Trump wins his party’s nomination. But she may be vulnerable elsewhere.


Once white working-class voters were a lynchpin of the Democratic coalition. That began to change in 1980 with the emergence of the “Reagan Democrats” – mostly blue-collar white Americans in the old industrial heartland upset by the liberal cultural policies of their traditional party. Since then, Democrats have never been able to win them back entirely. Now Mr Trump is making his own play for them.


The exact cross-over vote this primary season is impossible to quantify. But record turnouts in many Republican primaries this season – and the fact that Mr Trump tends to do better in “open” primaries, where a voter can choose either the Republican or Democratic ballot at the polling station itself – suggest that many white working-class Democrats are buying his argument: that the US is in big trouble, that immigration and free trade are destroying the national fabric, and that ordinary Democrats and Republicans alike have been duped and betrayed by the ruling elites in Washington.



Some analysts reckon five million or more white voters simply didn’t bother to turn out in 2012. Mitt Romney won 59 per cent of those that did; had he boosted that to 63 per cent, all other things being equal, he would have won. That plainly is Mr Trump’s calculation now – that an increase in turnout by whites (who still account for 63 per cent of the voting-age population) will nullify any surge in turnout by Hispanics put off by his tirades against immigrants and threats to build a wall along the southern US border. Hispanics (and Asians) in any case are less assiduous voters than whites and blacks.



In 2012, barely 40 per cent of Hispanics voted, compared to over 60 per cent of whites. With overall turnouts of 59 and 55 per cent in 2008 and 2012 respectively, there is plainly potential to expand the Republican vote, not least among people who have never voted before, but who attend Mr Trump’s giant rallies across the country.



In taking this approach moreover, Mr Trump would be flying in the face of the Republican National Committee’s official post mortem into Mr Romney’s defeat. To counter seemingly inexorable demographic trends, the party must increase its appeal to Hispanics, women and the middle class. In five of the past six presidential elections, the RNC noted, Republicans had lost the popular vote. But time and again, the property tycoon has overturned party orthodoxy. Why not once more?



Against this must be set a huge uncertainty. Some white working-class Democrats undoubtedly will go for Mr Trump. But how many normally Republican voters simply will not vote for him under any circumstances? For perhaps the first time ever, both likely major party nominees are viewed unfavourably by a majority of the electorate. But Mr Trump’s ratings are even worse than those of Ms Clinton – 63 per cent negative, according to Gallup, compared to “only” 53 per cent for Ms Clinton

 

[superbeets]

'Take it to the bank!' Trump has a 97 percent chance of beating Hillary in the general election says college professor who is 'almost certain' the Donald WILL be the next U.S. president

• Professor Helmut Norpoth’s statistical modeling gives Trump a 97 percent chance of beating Clinton in November - if he's the GOP nominee

• He'd have an even better shot against Bernie Sanders - 99 percent

• Norpoth's model has accurately predicted the winner of every national election since 1912, The Statesman reports, except the election of 1960

 

[superbeets]

 

[superbeets]

 

[vitterd]

SB......Trump will not win a general election but your weird attraction to him is very scary.

 

[The Guesser]

SB......Trump will not win a general election but your weird attraction to him is very scary.

Drumpf's his new cock to suck after Putin ran away from Syria. Guy is scarily obsessed.

 

[superbeets]

Not even my wife knows': secret Donald Trump voters speak out.

We asked Guardian readers who are voting for Trump why they support him. From firm conservatives to fed-up liberals, their answers were reveal





The Hispanic attorney (29, Florida)


‘He has demonstrated that he is, at heart, a caring person’
On paper, I probably look like a guaranteed Cruz or Rubio vote. I’m a millennial woman, my parents immigrated from Castro’s Cuba, I work as a trial attorney in Miami and I’m a born-again Christian. But I’m voting for Donald Trump, and I’ve convinced all my friends and family to do so as well.
My sister worked for him and has spoken glowingly of him for years, just like everyone else who actually knows the man. I trust her judgment more than any random pundit’s. Actions speak louder than words, and he has demonstrated that he is, at heart, a caring person through his many random acts of kindness. His peers say there are “two Trumps” – the brash character he portrays himself as, and the decent man they know behind closed doors. It’s clearly a strategy; his proclamations have kept him on the front pages for a sustained eight months.


Before he ran, the left’s stranglehold on the national conversation of what is or isn’t tolerable was getting stronger by the minute. It was the year of Caitlyn Jenner. Rachel Dolezal. Black Lives Matter. Anyone who even hinted at disapproval was exiled. Every week, someone would dare to blurt out something un-PC, and the media would absolutely crucify them. It had me thinking this was it. We’ve lost. How on earth can we hope to defeat these people, with their complete domination of the national conversation and relentless narrative of “Progress! Tolerance! Acceptance! Feels!”?


Political correctness is the birthplace of disastrous, un-American policies that will destroy the country in a death by a thousand cuts. But here comes Trump, the first person who didn’t even blink when the machine turns its sights on him.


He didn’t just fight back. He chewed it up and spit it out.

 

[superbeets]

The casino supervisor (56, Oklahoma)

‘We are completely tired of government’
I am a Democrat but will vote for Trump, because he is not bought and paid for by anyone. We the American people are tired of politicians owing favors to rich businessmen, bankers, oil companies and stock markets. It should be against the law to have lobbyists involved with government.
The middle class and lower class – which I am part of – are completely tired of our government, which treats our veterans like they don’t even exist. These are men and women who have gone to fight for what they think was the right reason, only to see that it was for money or some arms sale that is done behind closed doors. We are also sick and tired of working and paying taxes and then seeing our government send it to other countries to benefit someone else when we have homeless people and vets that need it just as much.


If you noticed, in the Nevada election Trump won 46% of the Hispanic vote and the reason is because the legal Hispanic voters also have to compete with the illegal immigrants for jobs.


Being a businessman, I think our government will have to be run like a business, and Trump has the experience to do it. Trump sees that we have a problem, and he is willing to try and fix it.

 

[superbeets]

[h=2]The yoga teacher (29, Tennessee)[/h]
[h=2]‘Don’t publish my name. It would ruin my progressive image’[/h]
Barack Obama talked about hope and change, but I believe he failed to deliver on his promises. His record with drone strikes and prosecutions of whistleblowers are especially troubling (not to mention he didn’t follow-through with prosecutions of those who caused the financial crisis).
As far as Obamacare goes, I’m not buying it, because it seems ignorant to throw money at a problem and hope it will get better. I’m glad more people are covered, but the plans aren’t worth shit, as many of them don’t kick in until you spend thousands on a co-pay. No thanks.
Bernie is a breath of fresh air, but I’m not sure he can beat Hillary. In a match between Bernie and Donald, I’d vote for the former. In a match between Hillary and Donald, I’d vote for the latter. It isn’t a vote for Trump, but rather a vote against the political establishment (which must be removed from office at any cost – even if it means electing a reality TV star for president). The stakes are too high. Hillary cannot win or the oligarchy will continue unabated.
And please don’t publish my name, it would ruin the whole “progressive” image (and my girlfriend might kill me).
I bet a lot of pragmatic sorts are in the same boat ...

 

[superbeets]

[h=2]The retired biomedical engineer (56, Hawaii)[/h]
[h=2]‘It’s too late for a cure’[/h]

Given a chance, I would vote for Bernie. But the only choices will probably be Trump and Clinton. In that case, I will vote for Trump.
I believe that Clinton will continue the Wall Street-style march to oligarchy. With her, the eventual demise of democracy will lead to a fascist plutocracy. It is going on right now, and it will continue to be slow, painful and inevitable.
I believe that it is too late for a conventional cure. So, there is Trump. He is indeed a buffoon and a recipe for disaster. If he were to do half of the horrific things he says he would, he would be a catastrophe. He could be a blend of Hitler and Hirohito.
That’s why I would vote for him. The last time we crossed paths with a Hitler and/or Hirohito, the country woke up and fought. And won! He might supply us with the shock we need in order to wake up and fight.

 

[superbeets]

[h=2]The gay Arab Muslim student (20, Missouri)[/h]
[h=2]‘My parents are horrified’[/h]As a gay muslim, the Republican Party has not been kind to me, to say the least. However the Democrats almost arrogantly expect me to hand my vote to them because of who I am, which insults me.
I am a son of immigrants but we have always followed the law to the letter. Donald Trump’s discussion on immigration is extremely relevant. I even support the temporary ban on Muslims, even though I still have many law abiding family members in Syria who deserve the opportunity to come to the US and escape the horrors of the war. We don’t vet these people properly. To let them in willy nilly is ludicrous.

Trump will break the poisonous bonds that hold America and the cult state of Saudi Arabia. Clinton would never do that; she would continue supporting Saudi Arabia while bombing Islamic countries left and right.
My parents are horrified at the thought of a Trump presidency. They say things like “Trump is going to round up all the Muslims and put them in camps.” For all his bombastic remarks, Trump will not attack innocent Muslim countries. Ironically enough, he may be the best thing for moderate average Muslims. He isn’t our enemy, he is the enemy of the globalist Wahhabi cult that has propagated mass violence and murder through out the world.

 

[superbeets]

[h=2]The anti-PC college professor (50, California)[/h]
[h=2]‘I’m angry at forced diversity’[/h]I’m a liberal-left college professor in the social sciences. I’m going to vote for Trump but I won’t tell hardly anybody.

My main reason is anger at the two-party system and the horrible presidencies of Obama and Bush. But I’m also furious at political correctness on campus and in the media.
I’m angry at forced diversity and constant, frequently unjustified complaints about racism/sexism/homophobia/lack of trans rights. I’m particularly angry at social justice warriors and my main reason to vote Trump is to see the looks on your faces when he wins.
It’s not that I like Trump. It’s that I hate those who can’t stand him. I want them to suffer the shock of knowing all their torrents of blog posts and Tumblr bitch-fests and “I just can’t ...” and accusations of mansplaining didn’t actually matter. That they’re still losing. And that things are not gett

 

[superbeets]

[h=2]The evangelical pastor (51, Tennessee)[/h]
[h=2]‘I’m not electing someone to fight for my soul’[/h]Yes, I admit it. I support Trump, but it’s a secret.
My reason for keeping it secret is that I’m an evangelical pastor and have to hold my nose at some of the things that Trump says, as far as being tasteless and brutish. This language and attitude flies in the face of my faith.
But I’m not electing someone to fight for my soul, I’m looking for someone to fight for my country. While his attitude could use some polish, his strong stand against all things DC is appealing. I’m weary of going into a voting booth and casting a ballot only to see “more of the same”.
I minister to Hispanic people (most of which disapprove of Trump and some are illegal aliens) and see great contributions that they bring to our particular community. They are great people for the most part. But the rule of law must be followed.

 

[superbeets]

[h=2]The white male early retiree (62, Delaware)[/h]
[h=2]‘Trump is a wake up call’[/h]I am highly educated (PhD, MBA, JD) and a licensed attorney. I am British by birth and naturalized American. I grew up in England appreciating the free medical care and education that I received, and in that sense you could say I understand the position of Bernie Sanders. All my life, I voted Democrat.


I am also “unemployed” (forced early retirement) and unable to get a job because, in my perception, I am too old, male and white. You may think that discrimination over these factors is illegal and therefore not practiced here. I can tell from my experience as a hiring manager that you would be wrong. There is not even any point in me showing up for an interview now. If I try to hide my age and race on my resume, it becomes clear when you meet me in person. For the first time in my life, I feel disadvantaged by factors over which I have no control.
The tension between my liberal politics and the real world has become too much to live with. Your publication and others have endlessly described the demographics of a Trump supporter; people look at me and assume I think a certain way. I am tired of being looked at with these assumptions in mind. I may as well join the Trump bandwagon simply because that is how I look and am treated.
Trump is a wake up call. A president Trump could be as bad as Hitler, but if he shocks some good people in both the Republican and Democratic parties into realizing that they are ignoring legitimate concerns of a seizable minority, then let him have his four years.

 

[superbeets]

[h=2]The manager (52, South Carolina)[/h]
[h=2]‘People would realize democracy is messy’[/h]Not even my wife knows.
I’m fairly well educated – masters degrees from Harvard and University of South Carolina. Income in the upper 10%. Trump is the only candidate that gets it.
Do I believe that the US is “losing”, or that illegal immigration is destroying the economy? No.
What Trump gets is that a significant number of voters can be stirred up with a few catch phrases. Whether he actually believes he can do any of the things he has promised is beside the point. He has hit on a formula to get people motivated to do what he wants – acclaim him and vote for him.
I voted for Trump with the faint hope that his election would actually be good for the country. If he were elected, it would perhaps teach more to the country than all the high school civics lessons in the our nation’s brief history.
If elected, Trump would accomplish very little to none of his vacuous agenda. His congressional agenda would be as dead on arrival as that of Bernie Sanders’s. So what good could result? Perhaps more people would begin to realize that members of Congress, governors, mayors, and members of the state houses have the real power. That the framers of the Constitution created this wonderfully balanced system in which no one person holds the kind of power that Trump claims he could wield. That democracy is messy and frustrating. That change involves more hard work than just voting for somebody who says the right things.
Foolish hope, I know.