Hilarious TRUMP Lovers

[superbeets]

She is also wearing a shirt that says "Salam - I Come in Peace"

I guess you might be one of those Americans who support the repeal of the Bill of Rights. I may strongly disagree with that Muslim couple, but I will defend their right to peacefully protest. Thanks again for the veterans who died for our freedoms!

No not good for the couple.

She’s wearing a Star of David* with the word “Muslim” written on it:


Which is… kinda ridiculous as a reference to the holocaust, since Muslims were fine back then with the holocaust, and many of them seem OK with wiping out Jews today as well.


The message is quite simple.



Don’t Wear A Yellow Star Of David With ‘Muslim’ Written On It To A Trump Rally, Or Anywhere Else Really




I defend the right to remove them from the rally and would have assisted.



Thank you to all the allies that liberated the concentration camps, a pity that 2 disrespectful Muslims disgraced what the Allies stood for.

 

[superbeets]

Superbeets getting it handed to him in this thread. Me pegging him as a far right agitator could be one of the greatest reads in forum history.

Vitturd and his perverse take on events. Vitturds usual reflex response, I response that is reflex and so by passes the brain. Keep posting your word salads. They give you away so easily.

 

[The Guesser]

Hilarious how Elizabeth Warren cleaned Herr Frump's clock today: repeatedly calling him "loser," "bankruptcy...bankruptcies" lol

http://www.mediaite.com/online/eliz...-a-twitter-war-he-didnt-even-start-this-time/

Elizabeth Warren Goes Off On ‘Loser’ Trump In a Twitter War He Didn’t Even Start This Time

by Lindsey Ellefson | 4:32 pm, March 21st, 2016

Elizabeth Warren, a senator from Massachusetts, has always been outspoken and determined. She’s had her plate full lately as she’s taken on the Republican establishment in the Senate, routinely lambasting their refusal to vote on President Barack Obama‘s Supreme Court nominee. She’s also surely under a little pressure due to persistent rumors that she might be the Democratic nominee for Vice President. Her opponents have shot back at her in their own ways, but up until very recently Donald Trump had no bones to pick with her. Perhaps that is because she once defended bits of his policies. Regardless, she lashed out at him on Twitter recently and now it is on between the much-beloved lib and the equally-influential GOP frontrunner.

The biggest mistake in this cycle was Lizzie deciding not to run for POTUS. She's have the D nomination wrapped up already, and would be a 10-1 favorite against Drumpf or Lyin Ted, and would probably be a decent favorite over Kasich. Pity. America lost out.

 

[BuzzKill]

Back away from the Muslims Superbeets or its trouble!

No not good for the couple.

She’s wearing a Star of David* with the word “Muslim” written on it:


Which is… kinda ridiculous as a reference to the holocaust, since Muslims were fine back then with the holocaust, and many of them seem OK with wiping out Jews today as well.


The message is quite simple.



Don’t Wear A Yellow Star Of David With ‘Muslim’ Written On It To A Trump Rally, Or Anywhere Else Really




I defend the right to remove them from the rally and would have assisted.



Thank you to all the allies that liberated the concentration camps, a pity that 2 disrespectful Muslims disgraced what the Allies stood for.

As I put down my Trump sign, sounds like we could have quite a party there Superbeets at a Trump Rally. @)

 

[superbeets]

As I put down my Trump sign, sounds like we could have quite a party there Superbeets at a Trump Rally. @)

You would go out of the rally horizontal. Those Muslims wearing the Jewish Star were fortunate to leave the building upright. You would not have been so fortunate.

 

[superbeets]

 

[superbeets]

 

[The Guesser]

It is time to admit that what is happening in America has terrifying parallels to Germany under Adolf Hitler in the early 1930s.

Khondoker Usama is a 23-year-old Bangladeshi student at Wichita State University in Kansas. On a recent Friday night he was at a gas station with his Hispanic friend when they were suddenly attacked. Usama, a Muslim, says a white man got off his motorcycle and started hitting his friend shouting, “Brown trash, go home. Trump will win,” and, “Trump, Trump, Trump! We’ll make America great again.”
For months now, the world, and many Americans, have watched with disbelief Donald Trump winning one Republican Party primary after another in the US presidential election campaign. Trump’s tactics employ vicious attacks on his opponents and anyone else standing in his path. His supporters grow more militant by the day. By the hour his Republican opponents appear more and more helpless to stop his bid for the nomination.
It is time to admit that what is happening in America has terrifying parallels to Germany under Adolf Hitler in the early 1930s. Now Republicans are drawing that comparison. Citizens Super PAC was founded by two men with close ties to the Republican Party. It released a YouTube video showing how similar Trump’s campaign rhetoric is to Hitler’s.
The one-minute video uses 10 statements by Trump and follows each with eerily similar statements by Hitler. It opens with Trump wagging his finger saying, “Our country doesn’t win anymore.” Then we see Hitler shouting, “The decline of our nationhood.” A few seconds later Trump says, “The total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.” Then Hitler this time promising, “The annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe.” The video ends with the warning, “Americans can’t let history repeat itself.”
Trump supporters have used another symbol of Hitler’s reign, the Nazi salute. A video from a Trump rally shows a man walking past anti-Trump demonstrators raising his arm in a Nazi salute yelling, “Go to Auschwitz!” That video has over 300,000 views on YouTube.
Hitler is given credit for coming up with the idea of “the big lie”. In a 1990 profile on Trump in Vanity Fair, Anthony Savignano quoted a lawyer saying, “Donald is a believer in the big-lie theory; if you say something again and again, people will believe you.” That same article revealed that Trump’s former wife, Ivana, alleged Trump would read a book of Hitler’s collected speeches from “time to time.” Trump denied he had ever read the book.
Hitler used the big stage to sell his big lie. The Trump campaign is also built around big rallies in big arenas. Like in the case of Hitler in the 1930s, today Trump’s admirers wait for hours to cheer his speech filled with bombast and exaggeration. Hitler had his brown shirts to do his dirty work for him. These thugs were assigned to provide security during early Nazi rallies. That security often turned to assaults on anyone opposed to Hitler. Now Trump followers are on twitter urging, “We need to start #trump patrols to secure the streets.” That kind of vigilante street action delivered the beating to Usama’s friend in Wichita, Kansas. The saying goes, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it is a duck. It’s time to call Mr Trump for what he is — a demagogue using some of Hitler’s tactics to possibly repeat history with potentially dire consequences for the US and the world.
The author is a consultant for Zee Media’s new global English news channel

http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/column-trump-s-campaign-rhetoric-is-similar-to-hitler-s-2192242

 

[The Guesser]

 

[superbeets]

It is time to admit that what is happening in America has terrifying parallels to Germany under Adolf Hitler in the early 1930s.

Khondoker Usama is a 23-year-old Bangladeshi student at Wichita State University in Kansas. On a recent Friday night he was at a gas station with his Hispanic friend when they were suddenly attacked. Usama, a Muslim, says a white man got off his motorcycle and started hitting his friend shouting, “Brown trash, go home. Trump will win,” and, “Trump, Trump, Trump! We’ll make America great again.”
For months now, the world, and many Americans, have watched with disbelief Donald Trump winning one Republican Party primary after another in the US presidential election campaign. Trump’s tactics employ vicious attacks on his opponents and anyone else standing in his path. His supporters grow more militant by the day. By the hour his Republican opponents appear more and more helpless to stop his bid for the nomination.
It is time to admit that what is happening in America has terrifying parallels to Germany under Adolf Hitler in the early 1930s. Now Republicans are drawing that comparison. Citizens Super PAC was founded by two men with close ties to the Republican Party. It released a YouTube video showing how similar Trump’s campaign rhetoric is to Hitler’s.
The one-minute video uses 10 statements by Trump and follows each with eerily similar statements by Hitler. It opens with Trump wagging his finger saying, “Our country doesn’t win anymore.” Then we see Hitler shouting, “The decline of our nationhood.” A few seconds later Trump says, “The total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.” Then Hitler this time promising, “The annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe.” The video ends with the warning, “Americans can’t let history repeat itself.”
Trump supporters have used another symbol of Hitler’s reign, the Nazi salute. A video from a Trump rally shows a man walking past anti-Trump demonstrators raising his arm in a Nazi salute yelling, “Go to Auschwitz!” That video has over 300,000 views on YouTube.
Hitler is given credit for coming up with the idea of “the big lie”. In a 1990 profile on Trump in Vanity Fair, Anthony Savignano quoted a lawyer saying, “Donald is a believer in the big-lie theory; if you say something again and again, people will believe you.” That same article revealed that Trump’s former wife, Ivana, alleged Trump would read a book of Hitler’s collected speeches from “time to time.” Trump denied he had ever read the book.
Hitler used the big stage to sell his big lie. The Trump campaign is also built around big rallies in big arenas. Like in the case of Hitler in the 1930s, today Trump’s admirers wait for hours to cheer his speech filled with bombast and exaggeration. Hitler had his brown shirts to do his dirty work for him. These thugs were assigned to provide security during early Nazi rallies. That security often turned to assaults on anyone opposed to Hitler. Now Trump followers are on twitter urging, “We need to start #trump patrols to secure the streets.” That kind of vigilante street action delivered the beating to Usama’s friend in Wichita, Kansas. The saying goes, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it is a duck. It’s time to call Mr Trump for what he is — a demagogue using some of Hitler’s tactics to possibly repeat history with potentially dire consequences for the US and the world.
The author is a consultant for Zee Media’s new global English news channel

http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/column-trump-s-campaign-rhetoric-is-similar-to-hitler-s-2192242

Lets do a internet search for Hitler comparison, Lets do things Guessers way.


Guessers LAW.

If someone compares Hitler to someone else and it is on the internet then yes it must be true that the person in question is indeed like Hitler. And ignore for the exercise Superbeets rule that any comparison requires a minimum standard of thousands of deaths and genocide.


Here we go..................
Glenn Beck, for example, is one of many who has recently compared Trump to Hitler. But as the comedian Lewis Black has pointed out, Beck himself has long suffered from “Nazi Tourette’s Syndrome.” In 2013, Tim Molloy of The Wrap observed that among the people Beck has compared to Nazis are Barack Obama, Al Gore, and two Jews—former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and an Israeli-Jewish flight attendant on American Airlines who allegedly treated Beck as a “subhuman” by being rude during a trans-Atlantic flight. Among the “Downfall” parody videos on Youtube, there needs to be one entitled, “Hitler Reacts to News That Glenn Beck Has Compared Him to an Israeli Flight Attendant.”

........................................

And Trump, it would appear, is not the only potential Nazi-style dictator still in the Republican race for the GOP presidential nomination. Cruz is a potential Hitler, too, Newsweek writer Alexander Nazaryan implied when he tweeted “Ted Cruz has a strong ground game in Iowa,” along with a photo of Nazi soldiers. (He later deleted the tweet.) Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz has denounced Marco Rubio for attending a fundraiser at the home of a rich donor in Dallas who owns some paintings by Hitler, along with paintings by Churchill, Eisenhower, Monet and Renoir. In a recent anti-Trump ad, rival Republican presidential candidate John Kasich implicitly likened Trump to Hitler by quoting the words of the anti-Nazi German pastor Martin Niemoller. Yet Kasich himself has been compared to Hitler by the left for anti-union measures he promoted as governor of Ohio.

.............................................



Nor are Trump, Cruz and Rubio the first Republicans to be compared to Hitler by liberals. “Barry Goldwater’s Rise is Compared to Rise of Hitler,” announced Jet magazine on July 30, 1964. While Goldwater opposed federal civil rights laws and most New Deal/Great Society programs, he was essentially a libertarian, at the other extreme from a fascist favoring a centralized state. “Every good Christian should line up and kick Jerry Falwell’s ass,” Goldwater said later of one of the leaders of the religious right. And the older Goldwater shocked many conservatives by defending gay rights.

......................................

Like Goldwater, Richard Nixon was frequently compared to Hitler—by his Democratic rival for the presidency, George McGovern, among others. Then Ronald Reagan was Hitler for a while, and, inevitably, the funny little mustache was bestowed on President George W. Bush. His father President George Herbert Walker Bush, to judge by my perfunctory research, was seldom compared to Hitler—perhaps because he was a poor public speaker, unlike Hitler and Mussolini. Instead, during his time in office the elder Bush was smeared indirectly, by conspiracy theorists attempting to link the Bush family as a whole with the Nazi regime.

...........................................

In addition to comparing mainstream conservatives and conservative populists directly to Hitler, many progressives and libertarians smear them indirectly, by comparing their followers to Hitler’s supporters. “Why are the supporters of Candidate X so similar to the jack-booted Nazis who saluted at the Nuremberg rallies?”

....................................................

This indirect version of the Hitler smear goes back to the 1950s, when émigré Marxist intellectuals of the so-called Frankfurt School, many of them refugees from Hitler, wondered why the masses of their adopted country had not yet risen up to overthrow capitalism. Their answer was that many if not most of the blue collar workers in the country that had saved them were sinister brownshirts in the making, afflicted with “authoritarian personalities.”

..................................

Around the same time, centrists like Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. and Peter Viereck were appalled and puzzled by the demagogic appeal of the red-baiting Senator Joe McCarthy. They couldn’t understand why everybody in America didn’t join them in rallying behind Adlai Stevenson. For these centrists and liberals, the historian Richard Hofstadter supplied an explanation in his essay “The Paranoid Style in American Politics.” More careful historians, in Hofstadter’s time and ours, have demolished his explanation of the populist movement in terms of irrational, quasi-fascist paranoia. But the phrase “the paranoid style” is endlessly recycled by lazy journalists and editorial page columnists. And the equally dubious Frankfurt School concept of the “authoritarian personality” is likewise recycled by social scientists in every election cycle. Typically the liberal academics begin by equating regular conservatism or run-of-the-mill populism with “authoritarianism” and then predictably discover—surprise!—that “authoritarianism” thus defined is found among conservatives and populists.

............................

Of course both sides can play the Hitler smear game. In October 1964, Republican Representative William Miller compared President Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society reform to the Hitler regime. More recently, the conservative pundit Jonah Goldberg’s book Liberal Fascism, which equated the entire Progressive-Liberal tradition from Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt to the present with Italian Fascism and German Nationalism, was a best-seller on the right.

......................................

That Obama is the new Hitler has been a frequent theme of conservative commentators and politicians during his two terms in office. A low point came when Mike Huckabee said that as a result of the multinational Iranian nuclear deal, President Obama “will take the Israelis and march them to the door of the oven.”

...................................

All of this bears out the “law” of the Internet age put forward by Mike Godwin, an American attorney and author, that "as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.” But long before Godwin, the German philosopher Leo Strauss—himself a Jewish refugee from Hitler—dismissed what he called the argumentum ad Hitlerum as a cheap debating trick: “A view is not refuted by the fact that it happens to have been shared by Hitler.”

.....................................

As early as 1944, in his essay “What is Fascism?” George Orwell concluded: “It will be seen that, as used, the word ‘Fascism’ is almost entirely meaningless … I have heard it applied to farmers, shopkeepers, Social Credit, corporal punishment, fox-hunting, bull-fighting, the 1922 Committee, the 1941 Committee, Kipling, Gandhi, Chiang Kai-Shek, homosexuality, Priestley’s broadcasts, Youth Hostels, astrology, women, dogs and I do not know what else.” The word “fascist” according to Orwell had been degraded “to the level of a swearword.”

..............................

 

[The Guesser]

Half The Country Sees ‘Fascist Undertones’ In Donald Trump’s Campaign: New Survey

And just about as many say he encourages violence at his rallies.


03/19/2016 12:31 pm ET | Updated 2 days ago

• 
  [*=left]
  Ariel Edwards-LevyStaff Reporter and Polling Director, The Huffington Post

AP PHOTO/GERALD HERBERT
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump waves as he speaks to supporters at his primary election night event this week in Florida.​

Half of America believes Donald Trump’s campaign exhibits fascist undertones, with only 30 percent disagreeing, according to a new HuffPost/YouGov poll. The sentiment isn’t contained to Democrats, who unsurprisingly are willing to agree with a negative statement about their political rivals. Forty-five percent of independents also say Trump’s campaign has echoes of fascism, as do a full 28 percent of Republicans.
About half the country believes Trump encourages violence at his campaign events, with just 34 percent saying he doesn’t. The rest aren’t sure. Meanwhile, 27 percent of Republicans say it’s acceptable to “rough up” protesters at political events.
The survey comes in the wake of dozens of arrests and physical altercations tied to Trump’s campaign rallies, including clashes after an event was canceled in Chicago.
Trump, who once offered to pay his supporters’ legal fees if they “knock the crap out of” potential tomato-throwers, has since sought to downplay the frequency of such problems.
“The press is now going, they’re saying, ‘Oh, but there’s such violence.’ No violence. You know how many people have been hurt at our rallies? I think, like, basically none except maybe somebody got hit once,” the businessman said last week in North Carolina.
Most Americans, though, have a very different impression. Two-thirds say there’s more violence at Trump’s events than at those for other candidates, with 62 percent saying the clashes are part of a broader pattern rather than isolated incidents.


That level of agreement on such a politically charged question is itself unusual. It far outstrips, for example, the fraction of the public that sees a broad pattern of police violence against black men.
It even extends somewhat to the GOP: A 55 percent majority of Republicans consider Trump’s events unusually violent, and 61 percent believe the violent clashes are part of a bigger pattern.
Who’s To Blame?

The data indicates that people generally consider protesters and the media to be most responsible for the uptick in violence, even if they also agree that Trump fans the flames. Fifty-four percent say protesters shoulder “a lot” of the blame, 41 percent say Trump’s supporters do and 47 percent say Trump himself does.
Only 23 percent of Republicans, though, say Trump is largely responsible, with barely one-quarter believing that he encourages violence.
Republicans place even less blame on Trump’s supporters, as just 18 percent say they bear a lot of responsibility. In contrast, half place that level of blame on “the mainstream media,” and 78 percent put that degree of fault on protesters.
While some of the GOP response is likely due to rallying around the party’s front-runner, Republicans are also less amenable toward protesting in general. They’re 20 points less likely than Democrats to say it’s acceptable for protesters to turn up at candidates’ rallies, and nearly twice as likely to say it’s all right for those protesters to be thrown out.
The fact that such violence is continuing to happen — and that it seems to be at least condoned by the Trump campaign — is enough to give pause to much of the public regarding the nature of Trump’s candidacy, the survey finds.
A lot of the talk about Trump’s post-primary prospects revolves around his ability to reverse the overwhelmingly negative impression he’s so far made on most of the country.
In recent speeches, he has previewed some arguments he would make in the general election. Many, like focusing on people left behind by the economy, are relatively moderate, and have the potential to resonate across party lines. Convincing voters that he has the temperament to take office — or, at the very minimum, that he’s not a would-be fascist — may be the tougher sell.

The HuffPost/YouGov poll consisted of 1,000 completed interviews conducted March 14-16 among U.S. adults, using a sample selected from YouGov’s opt-in online panel to match the demographics and other characteristics of the adult U.S. population.
The Huffington Post has teamed up with YouGov to conduct daily opinion polls.You can learn more about this project and take part in YouGov’s nationally representative opinion polling. Data from all HuffPost/YouGov polls can be foundhere. More details on the polls’ methodology are available here.
Most surveys report a margin of error that represents some, but not all, potential survey errors. YouGov’s reports include a model-based margin of error, which rests on a specific set of statistical assumptions about the selected sample, rather than the standard methodology for random probability sampling. If these assumptions are wrong, the model-based margin of error may also be inaccurate. Click here for a more detailed explanation of the model-based margin of error.

 

[superbeets]

Originally Posted by The Guesser View Post
"Trump rallies are very similar to films I've seen of Hitler rallies in Germany, and Trump himself is using the Hitler model of Personal charisma without substance, Religious hate and fear of "the others". I'm sorry, but his rise in popularity has many parallels to Hitler's. Hopefully it's nipped in "

 

[superbeets]

The Guesser12-08-2015, 05:37 AM

"We are living through Germany late 1920's. "

 

[The Guesser]

MEDIA
‘Leave Megyn Kelly ALONE.’ — Beck Defends Megyn Kelly in Ruthless Open Letter to Trump

Mar. 19, 2016 10:21am Carly Hoilman
6.5K

​

Following Fox News’ open statement against Donald Trump’s “extreme, sick obsession” with journalist Megyn Kelly, Glenn Beck released his own open letter to the Republican presidential front-runner.
Fox’s statement, issued Friday, came after Trump unleashed a series of statements attacking Kelly, calling her “crazy Megyn” and urging his supporters to boycott Kelly’s show.

AP Photo/John Minchillo

“Never worth watching. Always a hit on Trump! She is sick, & the most overrated person on tv,” he tweeted.
In his letter, Beck defended Kelly as a public figure who is “brilliant, honest and brave.”
Referring to Trump’s ongoing attacks on “The Kelly File” anchor, he wrote, “Donald, She is a journalist. This is what they do. You don’t like her questions? Fine. Grow up.”
Beck compared America’s overwhelmingly enthusiastic response to Trump’s politics to an abused spouse’s relationship with an abuser.
“I will gladly take a stand against bullies and men who abuse women,” he wrote. “I will happily stand in line to protect anyone from abuse.”
“But, maybe you don’t care, because you deliver your beatings in broad daylight and in full view, daring us to stop you, Beck continued. “We don’t because our country is sick.”
Beck then suggested that many Americans are suffering from “battered spouse syndrome.”
After a long period of suffering under “those in Washington and in the media [who] have been verbally and sometimes physically abusing the American people for years,” Beck suggested that Americans are flocking to an even “bigger abuser.”
“‘America, you are better than this,’ is what she needs to hear,” the letter continued. “But as always, the abused always breaks it off with an abuser only to find a bigger abuser. It is their comfort zone.”
“You, Mr. Trump, know this. It is why you chose this time and this party.”
Read the entire letter below:

Donald,
I read your string of really sad and sick tweets against Megyn Kelly. First let me say this:
Leave Megyn Kelly ALONE.
She is brilliant, honest and brave.
I can only imagine the amount of security this mother of three now needs because Donald Trump has gone over the edge with some revenge drama just because she asked a fair question almost half a year ago!
Should a presidential candidate be so thinned skin that he must belittle, abuse and threaten women?
Will we really for vote you? A man who abuses anyone who doesn’t kiss his ring?
I know I will not.
Donald, She is a journalist. This is what they do.
You don’t like her questions? Fine.
Grow up.
Many of us have problems with the press. I have been asked questions much worse than what you were asked. For years.
The people know bias, and I am afraid in your case, eventually, the people recognize sickness.
Get ahold of yourself and stop preying on the worst in man. A real leader lifts people up, he doesn’t tear them down.
I know what I will get from you and your supporters because I dare speak out against you.
I know that your followers will write vile and hateful lies about me for this post. They will claim, I am a sellout or I have a vendetta against you. Read the posts below and see if they don’t belittle and deflect.
So be it.
I will gladly take a stand against bullies and men who abuse women. I will happily stand in line to protect anyone from abuse.
I have done it before. And the abuser and enabler said that the entire family was wrong and that we had a vendetta. It is what always happens in cases of domestic abuse.
It was the hardest thing I have ever had to do, but I stood up in my own family. And someone needs to do it now.
You see Don, I know who you are because I have seen your type before.
Verbal abuse is just as bad as physical abuse. But, men, like those who abused the women in my family were smarter, like you, than the man who used to beat my mother.
Words, most think, don’t leave marks.
But, maybe you don’t care, because you deliver your beatings in broad daylight and in full view, daring us to stop you.
We don’t because our country is sick.
We, as a nation, have battered spouse syndrome. We no longer know who we really are, many have given up and a few are about to light the bed on fire.
We have been told that we are no good, hateful, bigots, worthless and powerless by more subtle abusers before you.
Those in Washington and in the media have been verbally and sometimes physically abusing the American people for years. Mostly to cover the trail of who they have been sleeping with while lying to us.
We are weak, but those of us who see it must begin to stand and offer help and healing for the abused and abusers.
“America, you are better than this” is what she needs to hear. But as always, the abused always breaks it off with an abuser only to find a bigger abuser. It is their comfort zone.
You, Mr. Trump, know this. It is why you chose this time and this party.
You also know that some of us are on to you. It is why you poison the enablers against us and isolate the victims.
I am not a doctor. But I am a survivor and I would bet a specialist in domestic violence would agree that the pattern is here.
Your rage is terrifying to some.
You should know:
—you don’t frighten me and my guess is you don’t frighten Megyn.
We know what a little man you are. Women are more than a “tight piece of @ss!” As you have called them.
Megyn is a mom, wife and someone’s daughter. And if I may, the Bible that you so cherish also explains that she is a daughter of God.
Are we as a people not going to stand up for women being abused? I am not sure, but I want you to know, Mr Trump, that I will stand against abuse and my guess is millions of survivors will as well.
Mr. Trump, what would you do if someone obsessively stalked your daughter on Twitter for months after a minor disagreement as you have had with Megyn?
Wouldn’t you question the man’s mental health and advise your daughter to get a gun and a restraining order if that very powerful man stalked, reached out to her boss to get her fired, tried to turn her work friends in to enemies and then turned his friends into stalkers as well?
What would you tell one of your beautiful daughters about that man?
Would you laugh it off? Tell her she was wrong for doing her job?
Would you tell her he was qualified for the position of the highest honor and trust?
Your followers will say “she deserved it” or words of that meaning.
But, If Ivanka were Megyn would you tell them to stop their defense of the stalker and harassment of Ivanka?
Of course you would as many say you are a good father.
I know,that any man, with as much success and power as you have, to spend any of his limited and valuable time, tweeting all night and day after day for months, like a 14-year-old boy, means, to me, that someone must have hurt you badly in your past.
I have been there Donald. I know.
No one will say it, and you certainly won’t admit it, but my guess is, you were deeply hurt or abused when you were young.
It explains your entire act.
It is as if you stopped maturing in the 8th grade. You are a 14-year-old boy trapped in a 70-year-old body.
I don’t know what your pain is. But it is okay Donald. No one can hurt you anymore and you need to see that in your effort of trying not to be hurt you have become the abuser.
What frightens me, is what America is teaching you. By excusing your behavior, we are only making you more bold and once you “marry the nation” I fear what you will become.
We have become enablers.
If this is the behavior when we are “dating” what will you do once you have the ring? I know you love Putin.
You have said you want to open up the first amendment to curb the speech of the press you don’t like.
You bully, harass and teach your followers to do the same.
But at least, unlike your idol in the east, Putin, you haven’t shot any reporters in the elevator.
Yet

 

[The Guesser]

The Guesser12-08-2015, 05:37 AM

"We are living through Germany late 1920's. "

Damn, I called it months before the other wise people that are catching on now. Thanks, you sick, silly Brit Twit for showing how prescient I was. Not as early as Vit was in exposing what you are, but not bad.

 

[superbeets]

The Guesser12-08-2015, 05:37 AM

"We are living through Germany late 1920's. "

Guesser really believes it . Wow.

 

[superbeets]

 

[superbeets]

 

[superbeets]

MEDIA
‘Leave Megyn Kelly ALONE.’ — Beck Defends Megyn Kelly in Ruthless Open Letter to Trump

Mar. 19, 2016 10:21am Carly Hoilman
6.5K

​

Following Fox News’ open statement against Donald Trump’s “extreme, sick obsession” with journalist Megyn Kelly, Glenn Beck released his own open letter to the Republican presidential front-runner.
Fox’s statement, issued Friday, came after Trump unleashed a series of statements attacking Kelly, calling her “crazy Megyn” and urging his supporters to boycott Kelly’s show.

AP Photo/John Minchillo

“Never worth watching. Always a hit on Trump! She is sick, & the most overrated person on tv,” he tweeted.
In his letter, Beck defended Kelly as a public figure who is “brilliant, honest and brave.”
Referring to Trump’s ongoing attacks on “The Kelly File” anchor, he wrote, “Donald, She is a journalist. This is what they do. You don’t like her questions? Fine. Grow up.”
Beck compared America’s overwhelmingly enthusiastic response to Trump’s politics to an abused spouse’s relationship with an abuser.
“I will gladly take a stand against bullies and men who abuse women,” he wrote. “I will happily stand in line to protect anyone from abuse.”
“But, maybe you don’t care, because you deliver your beatings in broad daylight and in full view, daring us to stop you, Beck continued. “We don’t because our country is sick.”
Beck then suggested that many Americans are suffering from “battered spouse syndrome.”
After a long period of suffering under “those in Washington and in the media [who] have been verbally and sometimes physically abusing the American people for years,” Beck suggested that Americans are flocking to an even “bigger abuser.”
“‘America, you are better than this,’ is what she needs to hear,” the letter continued. “But as always, the abused always breaks it off with an abuser only to find a bigger abuser. It is their comfort zone.”
“You, Mr. Trump, know this. It is why you chose this time and this party.”
Read the entire letter below:

Donald,
I read your string of really sad and sick tweets against Megyn Kelly. First let me say this:
Leave Megyn Kelly ALONE.
She is brilliant, honest and brave.
I can only imagine the amount of security this mother of three now needs because Donald Trump has gone over the edge with some revenge drama just because she asked a fair question almost half a year ago!
Should a presidential candidate be so thinned skin that he must belittle, abuse and threaten women?
Will we really for vote you? A man who abuses anyone who doesn’t kiss his ring?
I know I will not.
Donald, She is a journalist. This is what they do.
You don’t like her questions? Fine.
Grow up.
Many of us have problems with the press. I have been asked questions much worse than what you were asked. For years.
The people know bias, and I am afraid in your case, eventually, the people recognize sickness.
Get ahold of yourself and stop preying on the worst in man. A real leader lifts people up, he doesn’t tear them down.
I know what I will get from you and your supporters because I dare speak out against you.
I know that your followers will write vile and hateful lies about me for this post. They will claim, I am a sellout or I have a vendetta against you. Read the posts below and see if they don’t belittle and deflect.
So be it.
I will gladly take a stand against bullies and men who abuse women. I will happily stand in line to protect anyone from abuse.
I have done it before. And the abuser and enabler said that the entire family was wrong and that we had a vendetta. It is what always happens in cases of domestic abuse.
It was the hardest thing I have ever had to do, but I stood up in my own family. And someone needs to do it now.
You see Don, I know who you are because I have seen your type before.
Verbal abuse is just as bad as physical abuse. But, men, like those who abused the women in my family were smarter, like you, than the man who used to beat my mother.
Words, most think, don’t leave marks.
But, maybe you don’t care, because you deliver your beatings in broad daylight and in full view, daring us to stop you.
We don’t because our country is sick.
We, as a nation, have battered spouse syndrome. We no longer know who we really are, many have given up and a few are about to light the bed on fire.
We have been told that we are no good, hateful, bigots, worthless and powerless by more subtle abusers before you.
Those in Washington and in the media have been verbally and sometimes physically abusing the American people for years. Mostly to cover the trail of who they have been sleeping with while lying to us.
We are weak, but those of us who see it must begin to stand and offer help and healing for the abused and abusers.
“America, you are better than this” is what she needs to hear. But as always, the abused always breaks it off with an abuser only to find a bigger abuser. It is their comfort zone.
You, Mr. Trump, know this. It is why you chose this time and this party.
You also know that some of us are on to you. It is why you poison the enablers against us and isolate the victims.
I am not a doctor. But I am a survivor and I would bet a specialist in domestic violence would agree that the pattern is here.
Your rage is terrifying to some.
You should know:
—you don’t frighten me and my guess is you don’t frighten Megyn.
We know what a little man you are. Women are more than a “tight piece of @ss!” As you have called them.
Megyn is a mom, wife and someone’s daughter. And if I may, the Bible that you so cherish also explains that she is a daughter of God.
Are we as a people not going to stand up for women being abused? I am not sure, but I want you to know, Mr Trump, that I will stand against abuse and my guess is millions of survivors will as well.
Mr. Trump, what would you do if someone obsessively stalked your daughter on Twitter for months after a minor disagreement as you have had with Megyn?
Wouldn’t you question the man’s mental health and advise your daughter to get a gun and a restraining order if that very powerful man stalked, reached out to her boss to get her fired, tried to turn her work friends in to enemies and then turned his friends into stalkers as well?
What would you tell one of your beautiful daughters about that man?
Would you laugh it off? Tell her she was wrong for doing her job?
Would you tell her he was qualified for the position of the highest honor and trust?
Your followers will say “she deserved it” or words of that meaning.
But, If Ivanka were Megyn would you tell them to stop their defense of the stalker and harassment of Ivanka?
Of course you would as many say you are a good father.
I know,that any man, with as much success and power as you have, to spend any of his limited and valuable time, tweeting all night and day after day for months, like a 14-year-old boy, means, to me, that someone must have hurt you badly in your past.
I have been there Donald. I know.
No one will say it, and you certainly won’t admit it, but my guess is, you were deeply hurt or abused when you were young.
It explains your entire act.
It is as if you stopped maturing in the 8th grade. You are a 14-year-old boy trapped in a 70-year-old body.
I don’t know what your pain is. But it is okay Donald. No one can hurt you anymore and you need to see that in your effort of trying not to be hurt you have become the abuser.
What frightens me, is what America is teaching you. By excusing your behavior, we are only making you more bold and once you “marry the nation” I fear what you will become.
We have become enablers.
If this is the behavior when we are “dating” what will you do once you have the ring? I know you love Putin.
You have said you want to open up the first amendment to curb the speech of the press you don’t like.
You bully, harass and teach your followers to do the same.
But at least, unlike your idol in the east, Putin, you haven’t shot any reporters in the elevator.
Yet

Donald J. TrumpVerified account‏@realDonaldTrump
​

​

​

So the highly overrated anchor, @megynkelly, is allowed to constantly say bad things about me on her show, but I can't fight back? Wrong!

 

[roadreeler57]

Michael Shea it is my opinion that Trump is a pragmatist. He sees a problem and understands it must be fixed. He doesn't see the problem as liberal or conservative, he sees it only as a problem. That is a quality that should be admired and applauded, not condemned.

Viewing problems from a liberal perspective has resulted in the creation of more problems, more entitlement programs, more victims, more government, more political correctness, and more attacks on the working class in all economic strata.

Viewing things according to the so-called Republican conservative perspective has brought continued spending, globalism to the detriment of American interests and wellbeing, denial of what the real problems are, weak, ineffective, milquetoast, leadership that amounts to Barney Fife Deputy Sheriff, appeasement oriented and afraid of its own shadow.

Immigration isn't a Republican problem – it isn't a liberal problem – it is a problem that threatens the very fabric and infrastructure of America. It demands a pragmatic approach not an approach that is intended to appease one group or another.

The impending collapse of the economy isn't a liberal or conservative problem, it is an American problem. That said, until it is viewed as a problem that demands a common sense approach to resolution, it will never be fixed because the Democrats and Republicans know only one way to fix things and the longevity of their impracticality has proven to have no lasting effect. Successful businessmen like Donald Trump find ways to make things work, they do not promise to accommodate.

Trump uniquely understands that China’s manipulation of currency is not a Republican problem or a Democrat problem. It is a problem that threatens our financial stability and he understands the proper balance needed to fix it. Here again successful businessmen like Trump who have weathered the changing tides of economic reality understand what is necessary to make business work and they, unlike both sides of the political aisle, know that if something doesn't work, you don't continue trying to make it work hoping that at some point it will.

As a pragmatist Donald Trump hasn't made wild pie-in-the-sky promises of a cell phone in every pocket, free college tuition, and a $15 hour minimum wage for working the drive-through at a Hamburger place.

I argue that America needs pragmatists because pragmatists see a problem and find ways to fix them. They do not see a problem and compound it by creating more problems.

You may not like Donald Trump, but I suspect that the reason people do not like him is because: (1) he is antithetical to the “good old boy” method of brokering backroom deals that fatten the coffers of politicians; (2) they are unaccustomed to hearing a candidate speak who is unencumbered by the financial shackles of those who own them vis-a`-vis donations; (3) he is someone who is free of idiomatic political ideology; and (4) he is someone who understands that it takes more than hollow promises and political correctness to make America great again.

Listening to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders talk about fixing America is like listening to two lunatics trying to “out crazy” one another. Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio are owned lock, stock, and barrel by the bankers, corporations, and big dollar donors funding their campaigns. Bush can deny it but common sense tells anyone willing to face facts is that people don't give tens of millions without expecting something in return.

We have had Democrats and Republican ideologues and what has it brought us? Are we better off today or worse off? Has it happened overnight or has it been a steady decline brought on by both parties?

I submit that a pragmatist is just what America needs right now. And as I said earlier, a pragmatist sees a problem and understands that the solution to fix same is not about a party, but a willingness and boldness to get it done.

People are quick to confuse and despise confidence as arrogance, but that is often just the reaction from those who have never accomplished anything in their lives despite having opportunity and ability and people who have always played it safe not willing to risk failure.

https://www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump/?ref=ts&fref=ts