Hilarious TRUMP Lovers

[superbeets]

Wow, I sure called it in post # 2413, didn't I? Lots more stupid, irrelevant pictures, and completely avoiding the fact that you made yourself look like a complete idiot-come to think of it, why should this time be different from any other-by ridiculing a poll that you no doubt thought was run by Democrats. You also show yourself to be complete scum by advocating violence, not to mention cowardly behavior. Go guzzle some warm beer and start a soccer riot, Scumbag....

Some one gatecrashes someone's party, wedding, family gathering, etc,etc and starts shouting abuse he will get punched.

White man goes into a mostly black bar and shouts racist insults he gets punched.


Scum inciters who go to Trump rallies to shut it down get punched.

The insults you yourself post on here, you would not dare go up to someone on the street or in a bar. or in a mall, etc, and say those insults, you would recieve violence.


You live in a fantasy world.

 

[superbeets]

Wow, I sure called it in post # 2413, didn't I? Lots more stupid, irrelevant pictures, and completely avoiding the fact that you made yourself look like a complete idiot-come to think of it, why should this time be different from any other-by ridiculing a poll that you no doubt thought was run by Democrats. You also show yourself to be complete scum by advocating violence, not to mention cowardly behavior. Go guzzle some warm beer and start a soccer riot, Scumbag....

get a grip on reality.

 

[superbeets]

Wow, I sure called it in post # 2413, didn't I? Lots more stupid, irrelevant pictures, and completely avoiding the fact that you made yourself look like a complete idiot-come to think of it, why should this time be different from any other-by ridiculing a poll that you no doubt thought was run by Democrats. You also show yourself to be complete scum by advocating violence, not to mention cowardly behavior. Go guzzle some warm beer and start a soccer riot, Scumbag....

Exit your fantasy world. Bullfinch.

‘Oh my god he’s going to die’ : Driver, 18, who flew a Confederate flag from his pick up truck and ran over a four-year-old African American boy in Minnesota is assaulted by up to ten witnesses

• The 18-year-old man known only as Ryan was driving his truck in Winona
• The teenager was travelling with his 13-year-old girlfriend Brook Schrumpf
• His Confederate flag had recently been stolen from his truck and burned
• Witnesses attacked Ryan after he ran over four-year-old Damajae Winn

By DARREN BOYLE FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 13:31, 26 August 2015 | UPDATED: 15:39, 26 August 2015

• SHARE PICTURE

​

+4


Ms Schumpf said her boyfriend used to fly the Confederate flag on the back of his truck, pictured, but denied the symbol was racist, claiming 'to us that's just a battle flag, it has nothing to do with racism'

 

[superbeets]

Wow, I sure called it in post # 2413, didn't I? Lots more stupid, irrelevant pictures, and completely avoiding the fact that you made yourself look like a complete idiot-come to think of it, why should this time be different from any other-by ridiculing a poll that you no doubt thought was run by Democrats. You also show yourself to be complete scum by advocating violence, not to mention cowardly behavior. Go guzzle some warm beer and start a soccer riot, Scumbag....

Bullfich's Fantasy violence free world

 

[superbeets]

 

[superbeets]

Muslims wearing the Yellow star. A disgraceful thing to do. Inciting at a Trump rally SCUM.

 

[superbeets]

Nice knock-out.

A HERO

 

[BuzzKill]

The Battling Mormon could eaily handle the Trumpster

Mitt would devastate Trump, in or out of the ring. Mitt at least likes a challenge, he doesn't fight girly boys. Here Mitt takes on a fighter named Evander Holyfield. Mitt is in the red silk shorts:

Kick some Evander ass Mitt!

 

[Dafinch]

Muslims wearing the Yellow star. A disgraceful thing to do. Inciting at a Trump rally SCUM.

Nope, the scum is you and Drumpf: peaceful protests have long been a part of this country and others-ever hear of a guy named Mahatma Gandhi, Brit Twit? You're so fucking ignorant, you probably haven't, but, trust me, he was highly instrumental in putting oppressive British scum in their place. Anybody who advocates violence in response to such protests is obviously the low of the low-as is a candidate who expresses the view that his supporters will "riot" if they don't get their way. Over 37,000 posts in about 5 years, do you have a life? Did some soccer hooligans repeatedly kick your ass, so now you skulk in Mummsy's dank British basement, talking shit about a country you know next to nothing about?

 

[superbeets]

Nope, the scum is you and Drumpf: peaceful protests have long been a part of this country and others-ever hear of a guy named Mahatma Gandhi, Brit Twit? You're so fucking ignorant, you probably haven't, but, trust me, he was highly instrumental in putting oppressive British scum in their place. Anybody who advocates violence in response to such protests is obviously the low of the low-as is a candidate who expresses the view that his supporters will "riot" if they don't get their way. Over 37,000 posts in about 5 years, do you have a life? Did some soccer hooligans repeatedly kick your ass, so now you skulk in Mummsy's dank British basement, talking shit about a country you know next to nothing about?

Peaceful protest is not blocking highways. Is not trying to stop people talking. Is not shutting rallies down. Get a grip. Enter the real world, step out of your fantasy world with your imaginary friends.

 

[Dafinch]

Peaceful protest is not blocking highways. Is not trying to stop people talking. Is not shutting rallies down. Get a grip. Enter the real world, step out of your fantasy world with your imaginary friends.

Uh, yeah, it is, on occasion, as the link below shows. I notice you carefully avoid discussion of either Gandhi or your scumbag candidate talking about riots if he doesn't win, why is that?


http://content.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1887394,00.html

 

[superbeets]

Nope, the scum is you and Drumpf: peaceful protests have long been a part of this country and others-ever hear of a guy named Mahatma Gandhi, Brit Twit? You're so fucking ignorant, you probably haven't, but, trust me, he was highly instrumental in putting oppressive British scum in their place. Anybody who advocates violence in response to such protests is obviously the low of the low-as is a candidate who expresses the view that his supporters will "riot" if they don't get their way. Over 37,000 posts in about 5 years, do you have a life? Did some soccer hooligans repeatedly kick your ass, so now you skulk in Mummsy's dank British basement, talking shit about a country you know next to nothing about?

Clueless Idiot.

India today stands as a Nation because Great Britain built it. All its infrastructure thanks to GB, every railway, every bridge. Even there was no tea in India before GB introduced it. Those railways and stations still stand today.


You stand together with GUESSER as a History Fail.


The British ruled India for almost two centuries.


"They include railways, roads, canals, mines, sewers, plantations and the establishment of English law and language.


"Great cities including Bombay, Calcutta and Madras were built and some of the finest universities and museums in India were founded. The first definitive atlas of India was drawn and there were great social reforms, such as the eradication of thugee (violent highway robbery), the banning of the custom of suttee (the burning of widows on the husband's funeral pyre) and female infanticide.


"Perhaps most innovative of all was the bringing together of several different states into one unified India."


Gradually the power of the East India Company was eroded to be replaced by more direct British government of India, leading to more investment. The Indian Army was formed and its top officers trained in new military academies, modelled on Sandhurst.


At the heart of India's development was the expansion of the rail network, originally built to secure the colonial hold, which still prospers.


Within 25 years, 10,000 miles of track were laid joining distant parts of the nation. By independence, 136,000 bridges had been constructed.
Today Indian Railways is the world's largest employer, with a staggering 1.6 million workers on the payroll. By the mid-19th century India had a postal system, the spread of the English language allowed communication between people from different backgrounds, and the arts were thriving.


Wildlife and ancient buildings, such as the Taj Mahal, were protected.


As long ago as 1905 India's first national park was opened, in Assam state, to allow the endangered rhinoceros to flourish unmolested by hunters.


By 1914, the Indian mining industry, which was built from nothing by the British, was producing nearly 16 million tons of coal a year. Health and life expectancy both improved dramatically, particularly because malaria was tackled and vaccination against smallpox introduced. Dr Lalvani adds: "The 200-year window of British governance was perhaps the only period in a thousand years of Indian history to date when the minorities and people of different religions felt more secure and less discriminated against, with a notable absence of killings, conflicts and persecutions."

 

[The Guesser]

Muslims wearing the Yellow star. A disgraceful thing to do. Inciting at a Trump rally SCUM.

In the sick, Twisted World of this pathetic Sick Brit Twit, sitting there peacefully, wearing a powerful symbol of what Drumpf is about to do to Muslims(and others later) is "inciting", yet Drumpf encouraged violent idiots who attack peaceful protesters are heroes. hno:hno:

 

[superbeets]

In the sick, Twisted World of this pathetic Sick Brit Twit, sitting there peacefully, wearing a powerful symbol of what Drumpf is about to do to Muslims(and others later) is "inciting", yet Drumpf encouraged violent idiots who attack peaceful protesters are heroes. hno:hno:

It is not a powerful symbol of what Trump is about. You sick History FAIL.

It is a symbol of the holocaust. Not to be disrespected by wearing it to a political rally. Disgusting sick Muslims wearing the yellow star.

 

[superbeets]

In the sick, Twisted World of this pathetic Sick Brit Twit, sitting there peacefully, wearing a powerful symbol of what Drumpf is about to do to Muslims(and others later) is "inciting", yet Drumpf encouraged violent idiots who attack peaceful protesters are heroes. hno:hno:

Not peaceful protesters.


Peaceful protesting is not closing a highway, it is not trying to shut down a rally, it is not displaying the Confederate Flag and KKK hood.




We know you were a English Language failure, that is why you can't grasp the meaning of peaceful protest.

 

[Dafinch]

In the sick, Twisted World of this pathetic Sick Brit Twit, sitting there peacefully, wearing a powerful symbol of what Drumpf is about to do to Muslims(and others later) is "inciting", yet Drumpf encouraged violent idiots who attack peaceful protesters are heroes. hno:hno:

Exactly, observe his mindless babbling where he virtually claims that the millions of Indians who peacefully protested against the UK should have been GRATEFUL for the British boot on their necks. The guy is a rabid dog, and we all know what should be done with them. Notice the sound of crickets from Repubs re: the Utah poll that I posted-and here's another one:


a
[h=1]Poll: Utah would vote for a Democrat for president over Trump[/h] By Lisa Riley Roche, Deseret News

Published: Sunday, March 20 2016 12:15 a.m. MDT
Updated: 4 hours ago

Donald Trump, the front-runner in the GOP presidential race, speaks at the Infinity Event Center in Salt Lake City on Friday, March 18, 2016.
Laura Seitz, Deseret News
​

Summary
If Donald Trump becomes the Republican Party's nominee, Utahns would vote for a Democrat for president in November for the first time in more than 50 years, according to a new Deseret News/KSL poll.


More Coverage

• [h=3]Poll: Honesty and integrity top traits Utahns value[/h]

SALT LAKE CITY — If Donald Trump becomes the Republican Party's nominee, Utahns would vote for a Democrat for president in November for the first time in more than 50 years, according to a new Deseret News/KSL poll.
"I believe Donald Trump could lose Utah. If you lose Utah as a Republican, there is no hope," said former Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt, a top campaign adviser to the GOP's 2012 nominee, Mitt Romney.
The poll found that may well be true. Utah voters said they would reject Trump, the GOP frontrunner, whether former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton or Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders is the Democratic candidate on the general election ballot.
While Clinton was only slightly ahead of Trump — 38 percent to 36 percent — Sanders, a self-declared Democratic socialist, holds a substantial lead — 48 percent to 37 percent over the billionaire businessman and reality TV star among likely Utah voters.
"Wow. Wow. That's surprising," said Chris Karpowitz, co-director of Brigham Young University's Center for the Study of Elections and Democracy. "Any matchup in which Democrats are competitive in the state of Utah is shocking."
Also surprising is the number of Utahns who said they wouldn't vote if Trump were on the ballot. Sixteen percent said they'd skip the election if Trump and Clinton were their ballot choices, while 9 percent said they wouldn't vote if it was a Trump-Sanders matchup.
Both Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and Ohio Gov. John Kasich would beat either Democratic candidate in Utah, the poll found. Sanders came closest against Cruz, with 39 percent of Utahns backing Sanders to 53 percent for Cruz.
The Democratic candidates fare even better against Trump among Utah's many unaffiliated voters. Clinton would win Utah by 17 points, the poll found, while Sanders would see a 36-point victory if the election were held today. The margin of error for unaffiliated voters is nearly 7 percent.
The poll was conducted for the Deseret News and KSL on March 8-15 by Dan Jones & Associates of 500 registered voters statewide. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.38 percent, so the Clinton-Trump results fall within that margin.
Utah hasn't voted for a Democratic candidate for president in a general election since then-President Lyndon Johnson was running against Arizona Sen. Barry Goldwater in 1964.
But Karpowitz said Republicans better be paying attention to Trump's lack of support in a state long considered a GOP stronghold if they expect to reclaim the White House this year.
"I know it is early and these things can change," Karpowitz said. "But the fact that a Donald Trump matchup with either Clinton or Sanders is a competitive race is a canary in a coal mine for Republicans."
The BYU political science professor said the poll makes it clear that if the GOP nominates Trump, "they may have trouble, serious trouble, in reliably Republican states like Utah" let alone the rest of the country.
(Graphic below by Mary Archbold, Deseret News)

Utah's role
Chuck Todd, NBC News political director and moderator of "Meet the Press," said Republicans see Utah as a state that can help stop Trump from securing the party's nomination at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland in July.
"That's what the game is now," Todd said. "Both Cruz and Kasich need to pick up as many delegates as they can, but more importantly, it's about denying Trump delegates."
Kasich told the Deseret News/KSL Editorial Board in an hour-long meeting Saturday before a campaign stop in St. George that he expects the nomination to be decided at the convention, where delegates will be looking for the most electable candidate.

 

[superbeets]

US Election 2016: Trump card could secure victory over Clinton in game of demographics

Both likely major party nominees are viewed unfavourably by a majority of the electorate

• Rupert Cornwell Washington
• @IndyVoices
• Wednesday 16 March 2016

With Hillary Clinton – barring an email-related bombshell from the FBI – now virtually certain to be the Democratic nominee, and Donald Trump heavy favourite to be her Republican opponent in November, both campaigns are now focusing on a vital aspect of the race: how to win the demographics game that decides US presidential elections. And in this remarkable 2016 cycle, some old certainties may no longer hold.

Her wins in Florida, Ohio, North Carolina and Illinois on Tuesday leave no doubt Mrs Clinton is in firm command of the key Democratic constituencies of blacks, Hispanics and women voters. That is likely to remain the case this autumn, if Mr Trump wins his party’s nomination. But she may be vulnerable elsewhere.


Once white working-class voters were a lynchpin of the Democratic coalition. That began to change in 1980 with the emergence of the “Reagan Democrats” – mostly blue-collar white Americans in the old industrial heartland upset by the liberal cultural policies of their traditional party. Since then, Democrats have never been able to win them back entirely. Now Mr Trump is making his own play for them.


The exact cross-over vote this primary season is impossible to quantify. But record turnouts in many Republican primaries this season – and the fact that Mr Trump tends to do better in “open” primaries, where a voter can choose either the Republican or Democratic ballot at the polling station itself – suggest that many white working-class Democrats are buying his argument: that the US is in big trouble, that immigration and free trade are destroying the national fabric, and that ordinary Democrats and Republicans alike have been duped and betrayed by the ruling elites in Washington.



Some analysts reckon five million or more white voters simply didn’t bother to turn out in 2012. Mitt Romney won 59 per cent of those that did; had he boosted that to 63 per cent, all other things being equal, he would have won. That plainly is Mr Trump’s calculation now – that an increase in turnout by whites (who still account for 63 per cent of the voting-age population) will nullify any surge in turnout by Hispanics put off by his tirades against immigrants and threats to build a wall along the southern US border. Hispanics (and Asians) in any case are less assiduous voters than whites and blacks.



In 2012, barely 40 per cent of Hispanics voted, compared to over 60 per cent of whites. With overall turnouts of 59 and 55 per cent in 2008 and 2012 respectively, there is plainly potential to expand the Republican vote, not least among people who have never voted before, but who attend Mr Trump’s giant rallies across the country.



In taking this approach moreover, Mr Trump would be flying in the face of the Republican National Committee’s official post mortem into Mr Romney’s defeat. To counter seemingly inexorable demographic trends, the party must increase its appeal to Hispanics, women and the middle class. In five of the past six presidential elections, the RNC noted, Republicans had lost the popular vote. But time and again, the property tycoon has overturned party orthodoxy. Why not once more?



Against this must be set a huge uncertainty. Some white working-class Democrats undoubtedly will go for Mr Trump. But how many normally Republican voters simply will not vote for him under any circumstances? For perhaps the first time ever, both likely major party nominees are viewed unfavourably by a majority of the electorate. But Mr Trump’s ratings are even worse than those of Ms Clinton – 63 per cent negative, according to Gallup, compared to “only” 53 per cent for Ms Clinton



​

 

[superbeets]

[h=1]'Take it to the bank!' Trump has a 97 percent chance of beating Hillary in the general election says college professor who is 'almost certain' the Donald WILL be the next U.S. president[/h]

• Professor Helmut Norpoth’s statistical modeling gives Trump a 97 percent chance of beating Clinton in November - if he's the GOP nominee

• He'd have an even better shot against Bernie Sanders - 99 percent

• Norpoth's model has accurately predicted the winner of every national election since 1912, The Statesman reports, except the election of 1960

 

[neverbend]

Huffington post....LOL....Biggest Communist website on the net....Bullshit poll...

A feeble mind taking to heart a feeble poll, so typical.
ANALYZE THIS:

Utah: Trump vs. Clinton	Deseret News/KSL	Clinton 38, Trump 36	Clinton +2
Utah: Trump vs. Sanders	Deseret News/KSL	Sanders 48, Trump 37	Sanders +11

Utah in the last 3 election has voted Republican more than 2 to 1
Therefore if Trump were to only receive 29% of Republican votes in the general Democrats
in Utah would support Trump over the Democratic nominee 58% to 42%, in order for
Trump's support to be 37% over the 90% decideds. Perhaps you are even more challenged
statistically as you are gullible to gravitate toward nonsense to the extent that you would choose to
point out such unprofessional polling..

The one thing these polls suggest is how poorly Trump does in this Mormon dominated state.
He fairs far worse than Cruz & Kasich there but as things progress he will win Utah but with not
near the margins of Romney. Ytah has to be his worst state, not surprising you can't win them all.

 

[Dave007inVegas]

Poll: Utah would vote for a Democrat for president over Trump

Wow! Utah 6 electoral votes.


When Trump takes Florida, Ohio, New York and Pennsylvania, Utah will be meaningless.

​