Global Warming or Global Bullshit?

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
LOL

There

Definitely

Wasn't

LOL

!

You're just a dumb kid who "works" so hard you can't find anything to do but type ignorant bullshit on the Internet.

Carry on.

It was as blatant of a logical fallacy as there is. Not surprised you can't see it. You're really dumb and give me ammo on you daily. Poor fella.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,754
Tokens
So as we see, when an actual illiterate idiot sees a post he can't respond to either "logical fallacy" or "strawman" is typed (along with 'lol' of course)

So original.

So persuasive.

Such knowledge.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,754
Tokens
By the way, what is even funnier is that the troll is trying to say 'Non sequitur' (but doesn't know what that means) and keeps typing logical fallacy.

Which makes the claim even more idiotic.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Keep telling yourself that. I mean, it isn't as if you haven't just blatantly lied in this thread or anything.

What's 1 more lie?

LOL

Not one lie. I just call you out for making retarded posts, lol. You are honestly one of the dumbest posters here.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
By the way, what is even funnier is that the troll is trying to say 'Non sequitur' (but doesn't know what that means) and keeps typing logical fallacy.

Which makes the claim even more idiotic.

Not trying to say that at all. Just saying logical fallacy works in this situation, lol. It's fun watching you try to sound smart though. Sort of like when you couldn't do basic math. Lol. Pure comedy!
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,754
Tokens
Not trying to say that at all. Just saying logical fallacy works in this situation, lol.

Since you can't understand the written words, of course you think "logical fallacy" works.

You're dumb.

What is even funnier is that you don't know what an example of a "logical fallacy" is.

Of course this is all a pathetic attempt to distract from your ignorance on this topic.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,754
Tokens
Hey, why is this global warming dope talking about the weather???

the former vice president, speaking Saturday in Kansas City, cited many more recent examples how heavy use of fossil fuels is contributing to extreme weather events and trends, in his view.
Gore filled a Westin Crown Center ballroom with a 90-minute presentation, using photos and videos to illustrate a litany of floods, wildfires, torrential rains, droughts, dust storms, rising sea levels and increasing world temperatures.

http://www.kansascity.com/2014/02/22/4843012/al-gore-brings-climate-change.html



 

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
10,451
Tokens
What the fuck happened to climate change. All this is now is, you're a lair.......no you're a liar.
 

New member
Joined
Nov 10, 2010
Messages
78,682
Tokens
[h=1]Are YOU a 'global warming Nazi'? People who label sceptics 'deniers' will kill more people than the Holocaust, claims scientist[/h]
  • Claim was made by Roy Spencer, a professor at University of Alabama
  • ‘When politicians and scientists started calling people like me “deniers”, they crossed the line. They are still doing it,’ he wrote in a blog post
  • His reasoning for using the word 'Nazi' is because climate activists are, he claims, anti-capitalist fascists

Barack Obama, David Cameron and Richard Branson are all ‘global warming Nazis’.
This is according to scientist Roy Spencer, who is a professor at the University of Alabama at Huntsville and a vocal denier of man-made climate change.
Dr Spencer believe that people who label those against human-induced global warming ‘climate deniers’ will ‘kill far more people than the Nazis ever did.’

article-2566659-1BC9AF8200000578-714_634x351.jpg

+3

The radical claim was made by climate scientist Roy Spencer, who is a professor at the University of Alabama at Huntsville and a vocal denier of man-made climate change



He argues, these same people should be appropriately labelled as ‘global warming Nazis.’

‘When politicians and scientists started calling people like me “deniers”, they crossed the line. They are still doing it,’ he wrote in a blog post published yesterday.

article-2566659-1BC9BEDA00000578-241_634x441.jpg

+3

David Cameron is known to have used the term 'climate change denier' along with Barack Obama, Richard Branson, Nick Clegg and Ed Davey


‘They indirectly equate the sceptics' view that global warming is not necessarily all manmade nor a serious problem, with the denial that the Nazi's extermination of millions of Jews ever happened’ wrote Spencer on his blog.
‘Too many of us for too long have ignored the repulsive, extremist nature of the comparison,’ he continues. ‘It's time to push back.'
His reasoning in using the word Nazis is because climate activists are, in his words, 'anti-capitalist fascists'.
‘[They are] willing to sacrifice millions of lives of poor people at the altar of radical environmentalism,’ he wrote.
The words come from a prominent figure in debates surrounding climate change.
Dr Spencer has been a called number of times by the Republican Party to give evidence to Congress.
But the term ‘climate change denier’ isn’t hated by everyone.
Dr Richard Lindzen, when asked which descriptive term he preferred, said: ‘I actually like “denier.” That's closer than "sceptic"’.
Steve Milloy, the operator of the climate change denial website JunkScience.com, told Popular Science, ‘Me, I just stick with "denier" ... I'm happy to be a denier.’
Dr Spencer has previously said: ‘I view my job a little like a legislator, supported by the taxpayer, to protect the interests of the taxpayer and to minimise the role of government.’
In the opening and closing of his blog, he writes: ‘Yeah, somebody pushed my button.'
 

New member
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
18,212
Tokens
Said the guy who does 2 things with his life = 1) Sleep .... 2) Troll


There is sleep walking, why not sleep talking (posting etc). lol We assume he is awake when he posts.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
This:

Was another laughable and preposterous lie.

Not a lie at all...

“If the United States considers an operation against a terrorist identified as a US person, the Department of Justice will conduct an additional legal analysis to ensure that such action may be conducted against the individual consistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States,” reads a portion of the policy standards and procedures released by the White House last year.

http://rt.com/usa/drone-strike-possible-citizen-401/
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,754
Tokens
Not a lie at all...

“If the United States considers an operation against a terrorist identified as a US person, the Department of Justice will conduct an additional legal analysis to ensure that such action may be conducted against the individual consistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States,” reads a portion of the policy standards and procedures released by the White House last year.

http://rt.com/usa/drone-strike-possible-citizen-401/

Hysterical.

An "additional legal review" by the Executive Branch is not a 'check and balance' as properly understood.

As I've said before, you really are a blathering idiot. You don't know what the words you are typing mean.

Anyway, you of course clowned yourself with your own link:

the White House has admitted to killing three other American citizens abroad since 2009 using drones — Samir Khan, Jude Kenan Mohammed and Al-Awlaki’s teenage son, Abdulrahman. The administration acknowledged that none of those three were intended to be executed, but were rather killed incidentally

 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,754
Tokens
Anyway, the suggestion that "97%!" agree with global warming is laughable and preposterous (especially since the globe isn't warming)

only 1 - 3% of respondents "explicitly stated agreement with the IPCC declarations on global warming," and that there was "no agreement with a catastrophic view."
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Hysterical.

An "additional legal review" by the Executive Branch is not a 'check and balance' as properly understood.

As I've said before, you really are a blathering idiot. You don't know what the words you are typing mean.

Anyway, you of course clowned yourself with your own link:

the White House has admitted to killing three other American citizens abroad since 2009 using drones — Samir Khan, Jude Kenan Mohammed and Al-Awlaki’s teenage son, Abdulrahman. The administration acknowledged that none of those three were intended to be executed, but were rather killed incidentally


Yes it is checks and balances. And if you are an American citizen hanging out in Al Qaeda strongholds overseas you might be incidentally killed. Don't join al Qaeda and you'll be fine.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,713
Messages
13,558,625
Members
100,672
Latest member
nhacaihb88help
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com