Global Warming or Global Bullshit?

Search

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
Of course he is. He accepts every tenet of evolution, except that he believes that *random* mutations are not random, but guided by an intelligent designer.

"Behe appears to accept almost all of evolutionary theory, barring random mutation, which is replaced with guided mutation at the hand of an unnamed designer."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Behe

Only you would try to back-peddle and claim that one has to agree with Darwin on every facet of evolution to be an evolutionist, by the way - which NO ONE DOES ANYMORE, which
is why modern Darwinists are called neo-Darwinists.

Have you ever been right about anything in here?

Lmao, when someone calls someone an evolutionist, there is no ID involved, there isn't any irreducible complexity. They just mean a regular evolutionist. That's why you have to add the "theistic" evolutionist in order to describe Behe. It's like when someone says they are going to see the doctor it's implied that they mean a regular doctor, not a witch doctor. If you are going to see a witch doctor you say I'm going to see a witch doctor, you do not call them a doctor, lol.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
Oh wow, even bringing out the pictures like Dave!! He's in full loser mode, lol.

You compare one poster to another to argue they are a loser. Everyone here knows you're a loser. So we just call you a loser. Other poster's names need not be included to add weight to the charge (insert idiotic lol here)
 

Rx Normal
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
51,839
Tokens
Climate scientist will say ‘global warming Nazis’ until they drop ‘denier’ label

Posted By Michael Bastasch On 4:09 PM 02/20/2014 In | No Comments

neo-nazi-reuters-e1383592660209.jpg


Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer is sick of being labeled a global warming ‘denier’ by politicians and environmentalists. So sick of it, in fact, that he’s going to start calling detractors “global warming Nazis” until he is no longer called a “denier.”

“Yeah, somebody pushed my button,” Spencer wrote on his blog. “When politicians and scientists started calling people like me ‘deniers’, they crossed the line.”

“They indirectly equate (1) the skeptics’ view that global warming is not necessarily all manmade nor a serious problem, with (2) the denial that the Nazi’s extermination of millions of Jews ever happened,” Spencer added.

“Too many of us for too long have ignored the repulsive, extremist nature of the comparison. It’s time to push back,” he wrote. “I’m now going to start calling these people “global warming Nazis.’”

The term global warming “denier” is given to those who are skeptical or deny the existence of man-made global warming. While “deniers” don’t necessarily argue that the globe has not warmed or that the climate does not change, instead, they are skeptical that human activity is a major cause of it.

Environmentalists and politicians often use the term to malign those who argue against government action on climate. Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse regularly lambastes climate “deniers”, including in a speech he gave on the Senate floor in January.

Environmental activists also ramped up their campaign to label Members of Congress who are skeptical of global warming as “deniers” and “anti-science”. Activists from Organizing for Actiondelivered “Climate Denier Awards” — unicorn trophies — to members of congress they branded as “climate deniers” last summer.

The League of Conservation launched $2 million ad campaign against “anti-science” congressmen in competitive districts. The group targeted Republicans Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Rep. Mike Coffman of Colorado, Rep. Rodney Davis of Illinois and Rep. Dan Benishek of Michigan.

“The American people are tired of Washington politicians ignoring basic scientific facts and standing in the way of action on climate change,” said LCV president Gene Karpinski. “This ad campaign shows that members of Congress won’t be able to sweep their extreme, anti-science voting records under the rug.”

While Republicans in Congress may put up with the labeling, Dr. Spencer is sick of it.

“Like the Nazis, they advocate the supreme authority of the state (fascism), which in turn supports their scientific research to support their cause (in the 1930s, it was superiority of the white race),” Spencer wrote.

“Dissenting scientific views are now jack-booted through tactics like pressuring scientific journals to not publish papers with which they disagree…even getting journal editors to resign,” Spencer continued. “Like the Nazis, they are anti-capitalist. They are willing to sacrifice millions of lives of poor people at the altar of radical environmentalism, advocating expensive energy policies that increase poverty. And if there is a historically demonstrable threat to humanity, it is poverty.”

“They invoke ‘consensus’, which results from only like-minded scientists who band together to support a common cause,” Spencer added. “This authoritarianism tends to happen with an over-educated elite class…I have read that Nazi Germany had more PhDs per capita than any other country. I’m not against education, but it seems like some of the stupidest people are also the most educated.”


(H/T Climate Depot and Dr. Roy Spencer)

Follow Michael on Twitter and Facebook

:aktion033 :banger:
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
You compare one poster to another to argue they are a loser. Everyone here knows you're a loser. So we just call you a loser. Other poster's names need not be included to add weight to the charge (insert idiotic lol here)

When you act like a child and look stupid then it is more than fair to say you are acting like Dave. You can't compare me to any smart person on this site because it wouldn't be an insult. So you are left on your own trying to say stupid comments about how smart you are and how dumb I am without saying anything of substance at all, lol.

You are basically a less retarded festeringZit and JDeuce. Just pick and choose your spots to troll. Time to man up one of these days.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,754
Tokens
I'll listen to the President of the United States on this one.

The President is a scientific illiterate, so why wouldn't you? You don't know what science is, don't care, and have been reduced to misquoting your own links because you're comically ignorant (and dumb) on the topic.

Notice that you simply can not, will not, engage any bit of information that runs contrary to your silly, dipshit view on this topic.
And it isn't because you're 'very educated' (you're not) or intelligent.

The funny part of you quoting the recipient of the 2013 Politifact Lie of the Year is that he got that award by listening to "experts" in the same manner you believe he is listening to "experts" now, and you don't have the mental capacity to understand this (remember, you're neither educated or intelligent).

But the very, very best part of all of this is that you were reduced to quoting a scientifically illiterate politician and deliberately trying to misrepresent a survey all because someone who actually is very educated (and much, much, much more intelligent than you) decided to bait and clown you.

A rational person would take a lesson from all of this.

You won't.

You can't.
 

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
24,884
Tokens
When you act like a child and look stupid then it is more than fair to say you are acting like Dave. You can't compare me to any smart person on this site because it wouldn't be an insult. So you are left on your own trying to say stupid comments about how smart you are and how dumb I am without saying anything of substance at all, lol.

You are basically a less retarded festeringZit and JDeuce. Just pick and choose your spots to troll. Time to man up one of these days.

Said the guy who does 2 things with his life = 1) Sleep .... 2) Troll
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
The President is a scientific illiterate, so why wouldn't you? You don't know what science is, don't care, and have been reduced to misquoting your own links because you're comically ignorant (and dumb) on the topic.

Notice that you simply can not, will not, engage any bit of information that runs contrary to your silly, dipshit view on this topic.
And it isn't because you're 'very educated' (you're not) or intelligent.

The funny part of you quoting the recipient of the 2013 Politifact Lie of the Year is that he got that award by listening to "experts" in the same manner you believe he is listening to "experts" now, and you don't have the mental capacity to understand this (remember, you're neither educated or intelligent).

But the very, very best part of all of this is that you were reduced to quoting a scientifically illiterate politician and deliberately trying to misrepresent a survey all because someone who actually is very educated (and much, much, much more intelligent than you) decided to bait and clown you.

A rational person would take a lesson from all of this.

You won't.

You can't.

Nice logical fallacy. Lol. For someone claiming to be educated this is a very uneducated argument.
 

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
23,754
Tokens
Nice logical fallacy. Lol. For someone claiming to be educated this is a very uneducated argument.

There was no "logical fallacy" idiot.

You don't know what those words mean.

As I said, you could learn from this, but you won't.

You can't.
 

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
35,366
Tokens
There was no "logical fallacy" idiot.

You don't know what those words mean.

As I said, you could learn from this, but you won't.

You can't.

Of course there was, lol. This is another "tangents" situation and your problem with basic math, lol.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,118,713
Messages
13,558,625
Members
100,672
Latest member
nhacaihb88help
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com