Of course he is. He accepts every tenet of evolution, except that he believes that *random* mutations are not random, but guided by an intelligent designer.
"Behe appears to accept almost all of evolutionary theory, barring random mutation, which is replaced with guided mutation at the hand of an unnamed designer."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Behe
Only you would try to back-peddle and claim that one has to agree with Darwin on every facet of evolution to be an evolutionist, by the way - which NO ONE DOES ANYMORE, which
is why modern Darwinists are called neo-Darwinists.
Have you ever been right about anything in here?
Oh wow, even bringing out the pictures like Dave!! He's in full loser mode, lol.
You compare one poster to another to argue they are a loser. Everyone here knows you're a loser. So we just call you a loser. Other poster's names need not be included to add weight to the charge (insert idiotic lol here)
I'll listen to the President of the United States on this one.
When you act like a child and look stupid then it is more than fair to say you are acting like Dave. You can't compare me to any smart person on this site because it wouldn't be an insult. So you are left on your own trying to say stupid comments about how smart you are and how dumb I am without saying anything of substance at all, lol.
You are basically a less retarded festeringZit and JDeuce. Just pick and choose your spots to troll. Time to man up one of these days.
The President is a scientific illiterate, so why wouldn't you? You don't know what science is, don't care, and have been reduced to misquoting your own links because you're comically ignorant (and dumb) on the topic.
Notice that you simply can not, will not, engage any bit of information that runs contrary to your silly, dipshit view on this topic.
And it isn't because you're 'very educated' (you're not) or intelligent.
The funny part of you quoting the recipient of the 2013 Politifact Lie of the Year is that he got that award by listening to "experts" in the same manner you believe he is listening to "experts" now, and you don't have the mental capacity to understand this (remember, you're neither educated or intelligent).
But the very, very best part of all of this is that you were reduced to quoting a scientifically illiterate politician and deliberately trying to misrepresent a survey all because someone who actually is very educated (and much, much, much more intelligent than you) decided to bait and clown you.
A rational person would take a lesson from all of this.
You won't.
You can't.